It booted in 1 minute... I did not have any delay as mentioned in Martin Lo's install guide.
Hmmm, what did you do to your OpenCore config.plist that your DIMMs manufacturer, serial number and part number lists as "OpenCore"? Some special treatment for each and every slot? On my Mac (OC, 128 GB RAM) it looks different.Hey Macrumors fam... I just successfully installed 8 x 32GB DDR3 10600-R ECCthat I purchased from OWC labeled as 2013 Mac Pro Memory...
Forget that, the issue was related to broken TRIM implementation for Samsung SSDs.I was never able to discover the root cause of the issue, I'm curious about this boot delays due to RAM you mentioned.
Could you provide me a link to the original information ?
Hello
On my cMP 5.1 with 96GB of 1333 MHz DDR3 ECC (Monterey), I'm facing very long boot (Apple logo with crawling loading bar), even if everything works fairly well afterward.
I was never able to discover the root cause of the issue, I'm curious about this boot delays due to RAM you mentionned.
Could you provide me a link to the original information ?
Thanks a lot.
Yes indeed, it's the POST RAM check, the more memory you have the slower it will be.The usual slow boot (I had a cMP genuine 5,1 with 128GB ram) seems to be when starting the machine and waiting for it to go through its checks. The Apple logo with the progress bar was usually fairly quick once it appeared. But waiting for the machine to chime was fairly sluggish after installing the ram.
That machine had 128GB and also a lot of NVME storage, it was extremely slow to start up.Yes indeed, it's the POST RAM check, the more memory you have the slower it will be.
Yes... but I realized that I didn't need to build 12 DIMM Slots... I only needed to make sure the math was right for 8 slots.
You should read this thread from the 1st page and you will get answers to all your questions and possible future ones. This thread is not very long and full of useful information including how to setup the cMP with 32gb modules.Will somebody please help me out? I read somewhere that you cam max out the memory on a dual processor 5,1 2010 Mac Pro at 160G. I know that there are 32G modules available, so will the later OSs support these and allow you to mix different size modules? Any input will be appreciated. Thanks!!
PM me... I have 8 x 32GB DDR3 10600-R ECC that I purchased back in Nov 2022, that I offer for sale.Is there any "recommended" brand of chips? I. e. SAMSUNG better than Hynix or else?
Is there any "recommended" brand of chips? I. e. SAMSUNG better than Hynix or else?
Thanks for the offer, but now i allready ordered some from Germany where i live.PM me... I have 8 x 32GB DDR3 10600-R ECC that I purchased back in Nov 2022, that I offer for sale.
LRDIMM won't work on cMPWould 64GB modules work, say Samsung m386b8g70de0. 3 of these and 3x32GB would give the full possible 288GB, in triple channel mode with 2 slots free. Anyone tried these?
View attachment 2297290 Found and picked up some seemingly rare dual rank 32gb netlist hypercloud ram for my cMP 5.1. Attempting to see if I can run 192gb @ the full 1333 mt/s speed! I searched all over but could find no one running 32gb dimms that we're not quad ranked. Most 32 GB sticks are quad ranked and push the speed down to 1066 when running triple channel.
So far these are not functioning and will not get past post. Ram LED lights up on the board. I have tried multiple sticks, to no avail. My quad rank 32 GB sticks work fine. My config in open core is set up for 32gb. If I add one of the quad and one of the dual ranked dims it will boot but only read the quad. And since they're not getting past post I can't see them in Windows either. It is already known that the 5.1 will not take LR dimms and these are somewhat similar as they use rank multiplication and a onboard controller, but I don't think they are going to workeven though they are 10600r and not 10600L.
It's a shame as i did a lot of research but couldn't find anyone running them on these particular systems. The netlist hypercloud ram is known to work with Xeon 5600 series CPUs though and is supposed to be interchangeable with rdimms with no changes needed to the BIOS. But again that is for Windows and we all know that Mac is different. I will attempt to do some further testing when I get home
Wouldn't have been worth all the hassle after all.Found and picked up some seemingly rare dual rank 32gb netlist hypercloud ram for my cMP 5.1. Attempting to see if I can run 192gb @ the full 1333 mt/s speed!
Just tested all my ram configurations with dual-rank 16gb dimms and quad-rank 32gb dimms. Couldn't test 8x16gb as I only have 6 of them. The mhz is not correct in about mac for the 32gb setup with 6 and 8 as its just spoofed by opencore. I am suprised at the results though and thought that the 6x16gb @1300mhz would have been faster than the 6x32gb @ 1066mhz, but you thoughts on latency seem to be correct. Thanks for the input. Seems I will be sticking with the 6x32gb set up.Wouldn't have been worth all the hassle after all.
As extensive testing with 16GB modules showed, 1333 vs. 1066 is plain cosmetic if anything at all. More often than not 1066 have even been faster due to the shorter latency of 7 vs. 9. But it's absolutely marginal in benchmarks and will likely be even less in "real life".
Yes! You can enter whatever you like at the memory key in the config.plist So i have seen some nice speeds! 😝The mhz is not correct in about mac for the 32gb setup with 6 and 8 as its just spoofed by opencore.
I'm afraid it's only half the truth. Large sequential writes/reads should be faster for the faster frequency. But, as random access to small chunks of data is likely the more common situation, overall the quad-rank-dimms might be the faster by a very small margin. Not noticeable anyway.but you thoughts on latency seem to be correct.