Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Are you going to switch?

  • Yes

    Votes: 92 24.8%
  • No, staying with iPhone

    Votes: 175 47.2%
  • No, I'll go with another platform

    Votes: 3 0.8%
  • Considering it

    Votes: 101 27.2%

  • Total voters
    371

FFR

Suspended
Nov 4, 2007
4,507
2,374
London
Good writeup, but I just have a question. This is a glass half full or half empty kind of thing. The notch takes away part of the display, but you described it as effectively extra space for status icons? If Apple measured the screen size diagonally, not including the notch area, I'd agree that its extra space. But instead, they measured corner to corner and then removed a big chunk of it. They might have avoided this whole debate if they had measured it differently and said that they expanded the display up around the customer as extra space. Personally, I really like things to be symmetrical so it would bug me a lot in landscape mode. Probably not so much in portrait mode.

I see the notch as apple giving more space to the display not less.
 

tbayrgs

macrumors 604
Jul 5, 2009
7,467
5,097
Good writeup, but I just have a question. This is a glass half full or half empty kind of thing. The notch takes away part of the display, but you described it as effectively extra space for status icons? If Apple measured the screen size diagonally, not including the notch area, I'd agree that its extra space. But instead, they measured corner to corner and then removed a big chunk of it. They might have avoided this whole debate if they had measured it differently and said that they expanded the display up around the customer as extra space. Personally, I really like things to be symmetrical so it would bug me a lot in landscape mode. Probably not so much in portrait mode.

I completely understand how the notch would bother people. I, for instance really dislike the curved edges on the Galaxy models but there are obviously millions of people who don’t feel like I do. :p I just find that doesn’t the notch doesn’t bother me very much at all.

And as far as quoted measurement of display, agree that the 5.8” number isn’t fully accurate. To a lesser degree, I feel you could say the same thing about Samsung’s displays as I find the portion at the edges far less usable, so thr S8’s 5.8” would be less as well. I just am not hung up on a number, more so the user experience of having more display in a smaller overall package vs. the Plus models. I’ll never be someone whose decision to buy is impacted by one display having a measurement that’s a few mm different vs another.
 

FFR

Suspended
Nov 4, 2007
4,507
2,374
London
As comparison the 5.8in S8 will have more display area than X 5.8in. How is that giving more space?

Well if the s8 had a notch it would have more space compare to itself, wouldn’t it?

The s8 already has a top bezel, if Samsung shrunk the bezel to a notch it would free up more display around the top bezel, wouldn’t it?
 

mib1800

Suspended
Sep 16, 2012
2,859
1,250
Well if the s8 had a notch it would have more space compare to itself, wouldn’t it?

The s8 already has a top bezel, if Samsung shrunk the bezel to a notch it would free up more display around the top bezel, wouldn’t it?

What space are you talking about?

Cut 2 pieces of paper the size of 5.8in screen. Then cut out a notch from one of the piece. Are you saying the piece with the cut out notch has more "space"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamezr

Radon87000

macrumors 604
Nov 29, 2013
7,777
6,255
So you actually didn’t try one out yet?

I didn’t get to take it outside the store. The real max brightness on 7 Plus and X kicks in only when taken outside. Besides in Apple’s store the lighting makes any iPhone display look good. Displaymate crowned it the best display ever but it didn’t seem much different to my iPhone 7 screen in the store. It looked about the same to me
 
Last edited:

FFR

Suspended
Nov 4, 2007
4,507
2,374
London
What space are you talking about?

Cut 2 pieces of paper the size of 5.8in screen. Then cut out a notch from one of the piece. Are you saying the piece with the cut out notch has more "space"?

The space on the bezel.

I have no idea what your trying to say.
 

mikef07

Suspended
Aug 8, 2007
305
273
What space are you talking about?

Cut 2 pieces of paper the size of 5.8in screen. Then cut out a notch from one of the piece. Are you saying the piece with the cut out notch has more "space"?

Yes. This is fairly obvious. What Apple decided to do was the smart thing. There are only 3 things you can do

1. No bezel of any type which means hardware (physical components) is buried under screen. This is ideal but not possible yet.

2. Have a bezel that spans the width of the phone. Even though only certain parts of the bezel would house physical components you have a strip all the way across.

3. Put all physical components as close as possible in the middle of the bezel. Whatever space is not used add useable screen so that you can have more screen than having a strip. This is what Apple did and I am glad.

I see all these Android and anti notch people complaining about #3 instead of #1, but what they realize is that because #1 is not possible it was #2 or #3. I'll take #3 every time
 

tbayrgs

macrumors 604
Jul 5, 2009
7,467
5,097
I think the issue is 5.8” on the X is not the same as the 5.8” on the Galaxy S8.

Traditional display measurements and comparisons are based upon the assumption that the display itself is a full rectangle. The X and Essential phone require a re-thinking of this type of display measurement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: koigirl and jamezr

mikef07

Suspended
Aug 8, 2007
305
273
I think the issue is 5.8” on the X is not the same as the 5.8” on the Galaxy S8.

Traditional display measurements and comparisons are based upon the assumption that the display itself is a full rectangle. The X and Essential phone require a re-thinking of this type of display measurement.

I agree because when you get a measurement listed it 99% of the time means corner to corner with a rectangle shape. In this instance you do lose a portion of the screen, but IMO Apple can't change the way they measure screens by putting actual square footage (inches) as it would throw everyone off.
 

jamezr

macrumors P6
Aug 7, 2011
16,076
19,069
US
I think the issue is 5.8” on the X is not the same as the 5.8” on the Galaxy S8.

Traditional display measurements and comparisons are based upon the assumption that the display itself is a full rectangle. The X and Essential phone require a re-thinking of this type of display measurement.
This Verge article explains the geometry of it all. It comes down to the aspect ration and measuring display area from now on and not display size with different aspect ratios.

https://www.theverge.com/tldr/2017/3/30/15120824/screen-aspect-ratio-mathematics-galaxy-s8-lg-g6
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbayrgs

tbayrgs

macrumors 604
Jul 5, 2009
7,467
5,097
I agree because when you get a measurement listed it 99% of the time means corner to corner with a rectangle shape. In this instance you do lose a portion of the screen, but IMO Apple can't change the way they measure screens by putting actual square footage (inches) as it would throw everyone off.

Surface area would be a better measurement but you’re right in that it likely won’t ever happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamezr

mib1800

Suspended
Sep 16, 2012
2,859
1,250
The space on the bezel.

I have no idea what your trying to say.

Oh..You are talking about that kind space.

Well, apple made the decision with an ugly notch cut out that sacrifices screen area and introduces usage issues. But X still got a worse screen body ratio and a wider and heavier phone than the S8.

Personally I think it is the mother of dumb ideas to go with a screen notch cut out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit and jamezr

mikef07

Suspended
Aug 8, 2007
305
273
Oh..You are talking about that kind space.

Well, apple made the decision with an ugly notch cut out that sacrifices screen area and introduces usage issues. But X still got a worse screen body ratio and a wider and heavier phone than the S8.

Personally I think it is the mother of dumb ideas to go with a screen notch cut out.

So less useable screen was a better choice? SMH. Either the ears were bezel or useable screen. I'll take useable screen every time.
 

tbayrgs

macrumors 604
Jul 5, 2009
7,467
5,097
The display of the iPhone 8 is actually 5.85 inches.
5.8 for the display and .5 for the ears.
The difference is the aspect ratio.

That’s not true. Directly from Apple’s website:

The iPhone X display has rounded corners that follow a beautiful curved design, and these corners are within a standard rectangle. When measured as a standard rectangular shape, the screen is 5.85 inches diagonally (actual viewable area is less).

The 5.85” measurement is what the measurement would be if the corners weren’t rounded, that’s all.

And in their own diagram, they’re clearly including the ‘ears’ in their measurement.

B01395A2-FE3B-4B62-A029-0635B94A0A60.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit and jamezr

widgeteer

Suspended
Jun 12, 2016
1,565
4,610
I didn’t get to take it outside the store. The real max brightness on 7 Plus and X kicks in only when taken outside. Besides in Apple’s store the lighting makes any iPhone display look good. Displaymate crowned it the best display ever but it didn’t seem much different to my iPhone 7 screen in the store. It looked about the same to me

Wanna know why? Cause we obsess and argue over the specs, watch tech blog videos OCDing on the displays, etc but in real life we wouldn't notice any of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamezr

FFR

Suspended
Nov 4, 2007
4,507
2,374
London
That’s not true. Directly from Apple’s website:



The 5.85” measurement is what the measurement would be if the corners weren’t rounded, that’s all.

And in their own diagram, they’re clearly including the ‘ears’ in their measurement.

View attachment 733611

The 5.85 number is the measurement of the screen with the ears and notch in a traditional rectangular shape.
It’s 5.8 without the notch or ears.

62ca8fe54a79df4bd3eae4dfad02ab39.jpg
 

Zaft

macrumors 601
Jun 16, 2009
4,570
4,049
Brooklyn, NY
I didn’t get to take it outside the store. The real max brightness on 7 Plus and X kicks in only when taken outside. Besides in Apple’s store the lighting makes any iPhone display look good. Displaymate crowned it the best display ever but it didn’t seem much different to my iPhone 7 screen in the store. It looked about the same to me
Brightness wise or quality? Because from having both right now I can tell you the X is clearer and has deeper colors.
 

FFR

Suspended
Nov 4, 2007
4,507
2,374
London
So less useable screen was a better choice? SMH. Either the ears were bezel or useable screen. I'll take useable screen every time.

If you compare the s8 to the iPhone X , you can plainly see the iPhone X has a larger screen.

The iPhone X is wider, it doesn’t have the bottom lip, and it’s top bezel is flanked with more display on both sides.

f1e1d3dfc91d7efcb8945b3f72563dc1.jpg
 

mib1800

Suspended
Sep 16, 2012
2,859
1,250
The 5.85 number is the measurement of the screen with the ears and notch in a traditional rectangular shape.
It’s 5.8 without the notch or ears.

62ca8fe54a79df4bd3eae4dfad02ab39.jpg

You are saying the notch is just 0.05 in. You realised how small is that?
[doublepost=1510150406][/doublepost]
If you compare the s8 to the iPhone X , you can plainly see the iPhone X has a larger screen.

The iPhone X is wider, it doesn’t have the bottom lip, and it’s top bezel is flanked with more display on both sides.

f1e1d3dfc91d7efcb8945b3f72563dc1.jpg

Those phones are not shown side by side. Physically S8 is a little taller but your picture shows S8 is shorter.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.