I think the EU should force Disney to allow other companies to install rides at Disney parks.
Yes, it might lead to some malware - but it won’t be Apple’s responsibility anymore. If anything, they can use it as an extra advantage in their marketing - “Apple iCloud+ with extra safe App Store”.
to the point where no app is allowed any unique or competitive features.I love to see this.
We need to start reigning in these big tech companies a bit and forcing some interoperability and more consumer friendly behaviors on their part.
Interoperability doesn't mean that at all. All cars share same roads, all TVs receive same channels - yet somehow able to compete and innovate.No one would ever blame Apple for what happens with their iPhone.
to the point where no app is allowed any unique or competitive features.
Duopoly isn't a true competition - just ask US and their political system.What defines a “gatekeeper”… tech corporations can be competed with. I’m just so confused why this is happening.
Seeing as how no one actually IN the European Union makes smartphones, Apple ought to tell the EU to get bent.
Typo. You meant Steve.❤️
It is Apples fault. Too much greed in the eyes of Tim. […]
Yeah let's see how that goes...............Seeing as how no one actually IN the European Union makes smartphones, Apple ought to tell the EU to get bent.
If the only place you could install a ride was on land owned by disney, and the only way people could buy tickets to your ride is by paying disney, then yes I think they should too.I think the EU should force Disney to allow other companies to install rides at Disney parks.
But you don't have to go to Disneyland, at least not in the US. You can visit Six Flags, Universal Studios, or several other different theme parks.If the only place you could install a ride was on land owned by disney, and the only way people could buy tickets to your ride is by paying disney, then yes I think they should too.
This would still happen had Apple lowered the fees.So to install Microsoft apps, you first have to install the Microsoft app store.
To install Epic games, you have to first install the Epic app store.
To install Google apps, you first have to install the Google app store. This is what will happen. Every big software developer will have its own app store -- thereby circumventing any payment to Apple.
Or many apps will possibly have to be downloaded directly from the web -- and be paid for through various payment processors. So eventually Apple can only make money from hardware sales and from developers that remain on Apple app store, but the bigger app developers will surely leave the Apple app store. Apple will have to let users pay for system upgrades, like in the past, to cover developing costs -- right now the eco system pays for the system upgrades. Developers will have to pay more for Apple developer tools too.
Sure, it is not all bad because it gives consumers more choice. But the cost will be that the phone sphere will get more complex, no more easy install of apps, and the attack vector for malware will surely rise. In the end Apple should have been more proactive in lowering their commissions on iOS app store. They should have done that 10 years ago and then there would have been less problems. I love Apple to bits, but Apple has not been using their brains to foresee the future. Even Phil Schiller saw this coming and he suggested Apple should lower fees more than ten years ago (known from internal email exposed during Epic lawsuit).
"Users of small or big platforms would then be able to exchange messages, send files or make video calls across messaging apps, thus giving them more choice."
So this goes to show that no one at the EU legilastive committee have ANY idea how or even what End to End Encryption is.
EU: Make this work
All messenging Devs: You can't it's utterly insecure. How can we protect customer information if it goes outside our servers. That's what e2e Keys are. We cant share them across apps.
EU: I don't care. I am not a geek. Make it work. Stamps feet.
I don't see the problem with default apps, so long as the user has the option to delete them. Safari is preloaded on iPhone? Don't like it? No problem. Delete Safari if you'd rather use the DuckDuckGoose browser instead LOL. And if you like the BadgerBadgerMushroomMushroom browser instead, go for it.
Apple's Maps is preloaded? No problem. One click and you delete it in favor of Google Maps.
This is a comedy answer. RCS is a crapfest. No native E2E to the point Amnesty International had a go at it publicly. Google had to run a carrier independent RCS network to support it which uses Signal's protocol which is back to ground zero: siloed messaging networks.
ZERO PROBLEMS SOLVED. Again.
It’s not a matter of blame but if the product is degraded by some government agency then they won’t buy the product. Politicians don’t understand tech.No one would ever blame Apple for what happens with their iPhone.
to the point where no app is allowed any unique or competitive features.
I agree. Apple is a business and will make money hand over fist with or without managing and investing in their App Store that has paid out billion every year for developers. They could create a separate App Store that does not get access to premium features and APIs. It would require interested developers to do the heavy lifting and earn their money.In principle, I support governance that restricts the power of big business. But who is going to restrict the power of the EU? This just sounds way too heavy handed to me. Frightening actually.
But can I still say yes please to ‘iMessage interoperability’? ? Would be nice to see the big players work together on this.
Take a step back and think about this.
1. This is a proposal.
2. This isn't about just Apple. This actually hits Google harder IMO.
Exactly, lots of theme parks. Only two mobile OS's. You're so close to getting it.But you don't have to go to Disneyland, at least not in the US. You can visit Six Flags, Universal Studios, or several other different theme parks.
If you want multiple app stores and sideloading, Android is available. Indeed, that is what most EU customers choose.