i use the default OS X app and it syncs well with my iOS default app. I too find this sufficient. we mut both be old fuddy duddies....
Don't panic. Some old farts still use paper calendars apps......
i use the default OS X app and it syncs well with my iOS default app. I too find this sufficient. we mut both be old fuddy duddies....
I think Flexibits should take note...not a single post on this thread has suggested the price point is good.
It's way overpriced and people will continue to post about the pricing rather than how good the app might be.
Where do you want the focus Flexibits? Price or App!
Couldn't they just send out codes?
EDIT: Oh I guess it's free or nothing with promo codes.
Agreed.
This place freaks out any time an app is released that costs more than $0.99 or any time a developer issues a new version with a paid upgrade built in.
Quite honestly, if you have to think about the price for too long the app just wasn't meant for you. That isn't a bad thing. For many (most probably) the default calendar app is fine. This app targets the same kind of market of user that hasn't hesitated to shell out $50 for BusyCal, which, unsurprisingly, people here also had an issue with.
I, for one, am shocked that Flexibits would dare charge a price for a niche software product that can sustain a small business.
This thread is a perfect case study on how the App Store's race-to-the-bottom pricing has created a group of consumers who feel entitled to quality work for an unrealistic price - developers' time and livelihoods be damned.
Ah gotcha. Yeah that's unfortunate.I was wrong about this anyway, there's a non-MAS version with the usual licensing system with codes. So no reason there can't be an upgrade price.
I know it's not a perfect comparison, but they're in console game price territory. I can't imagine this calendar app cost as much to make as a console game.
I, for one, am shocked that Flexibits would dare charge a price for a niche software product that can sustain a small business.
This thread is a perfect case study on how the App Store's race-to-the-bottom pricing has created a group of consumers who feel entitled to quality work for an unrealistic price - developers' time and livelihoods be damned.
I must really be behind the times, I find the default OS X Calendar application sufficient :/
I must really be behind the times, I find the default OS X Calendar application sufficient :/
My stock calendar app works across devices with absolutely nothing needed besides iCloud turned on. Fantastical doesn't. (And yes I realize it will add events to your stock calendar. But if I'm going to use a different calendar, I want to use it no matter what device I'm using.) From a value proposition, paying for something that has less functionality across multiple devices than the stock calendar app, is a non-starter for many people.
wow, it's currently $50AUD and that's with the 20% off?!
What were they thinking when they priced this? Yes it's probably a very nice calendar app - but it's just a calendar app!
Such a shame it's so badly overpriced. I guarantee they'd more than quadruple their market if they make it a flat $10.
I got Yosemite for free
I don't think this thread represents Flexibits' target audience. For the average person, $40 for a calendar application is absurd. For a business owner, $40 isn't that outrageous.
No special "Thanks for buying Fantastical 1 - have a discount on Fantastical 2!" pricing?
Apple should just buy Fantastical and replace the Calendar app built into OS X with it.