Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Nuvi

macrumors 65816
Feb 7, 2008
1,099
810
I'm using Fantastical 2 both on iPhone and iPad but won't be using it on my Macs. The price is just insane if you compare it something like Office 365 which is very similarly priced but comes with all the MS Office apps + infinite cloud storage. Sure, Office is subscription but if Fantastical is updated once a year the cost ends up being almost the same.

It's realy sad indeed. I realy like Fantastical but I won't be paying this much for an app that should be in $10 range.
 

philipmv

macrumors member
Oct 23, 2014
35
63
Couldn't they have just updated the existing menubar window to Yosemite and kept the price at $20 (or better yet, given it to existing users for free?) I liked Fantastical for Mac because it worked with OS X's built-in apps, not because it replaced them.

They sure reinvented Fantasical. Reinvented the price and reinvented bloat.
 

iSee

macrumors 68040
Oct 25, 2004
3,540
272
Color me unsuprised.

It has become very clear that developer is very greedy for a couple of years. This is just another piece of evidence. Honestly it is not worth the price. iCal can do natural language parsing already.

It's not greedy for them to charge for the fruits of their hard work -- even if you don't want to pay that much.

Professional developers have to try to stay in business. Software takes a lot of time and money to create and that's whether they sell one copy or a million.

Apps with a smaller market, like this one, *have* to be priced higher than an app with a larger market. Otherwise there'd be no way to pay for the cost of developing it. (This is a small market product specifically *because* the built-in option is pretty good. There aren't a lot of people that need something more bad enough to pay anything.
 

Nuvi

macrumors 65816
Feb 7, 2008
1,099
810
Pirates, Cheapskates and people that only buy mobile apps who don't understand economies of scale.

they should look at the cost of some of my software...

Smoke - £1,300
Cinema 4D - £3,120
Maya Suite - £4.800
Nuke Studio - £5,600
Adobe CC - £50 a month.

I sure do understand the cost of professional software but this not the app which will be putting food on the table. Anyway, compare Fantastical 2 pricing to Office 365 pricing and you see what I'm saying. This app is overpriced by huge margin when comparing it with competition.
 

HenryDJP

Suspended
Nov 25, 2012
5,084
843
United States
I understand that. That's why I kicked off the post with "imagine". IMO, it would be nice to have a bunch of higher quality apps than the stock set, endorsed & integrated by Apple. Mail still seems somewhat flaky to me. Fantastical is better than the stock calendar. Font Book is pretty weak vs. a number of other font managers. Etc.

Apple has had 10 iterations of OS X to dramatically improve the stock apps (more if you'll count the Next OS as OS X before 10.0). Instead, while there's been incremental improvements, some of these third party apps seem "what Apple's should be" IMO. I'd love to see the M.O. change for an OS X iteration and buy the best of what's out there that challenges the stock apps, enhance/integrate them like the stock apps and then roll that out.

But alas, since that's not their M.O., I guess we should be happy with tremendous innovations like slightly more transparent windows (which I still can't believe was so heavily touted and repeated at last year's WWDC).

I certainly don't disagree with your concerns, because you're right. The stock apps have been either incremental over the years or untouched. Actually upon reading your post I realized a lot of the stock apps have barely been touched such as the apps in the Utilities folder like Grapher, Automator, Image Capture and the MIDI app. I guess Apple feels nobody uses them so they just leave them be.

Here's the thing though. In a way I'm glad Apple doesn't try and take over every 3rd party app and refine it. It puts the Developers out of business for sure and then we have to be subject to how Apple designs the software.
For example, I use PixelMator. It's such a steal against that over-bloated Adobe PS Elements. The UI is black and I love the design. For some reason I feel if Apple bought PixelMator it would have a white UI, some dumbed-down features and possibly some bugs.

I've actually had more success and enjoyment with 3rd party apps.
 

xero9

macrumors 6502a
Nov 7, 2006
864
487
Couple of thoughts:

1) The price is high but would be okay for a quality product. The problem I have with this company is that they haven't been very good about updates.

This company feels a lot like Coradine Aviation. They basically come out with a new version periodically that you need to essentially pay full price for (and their software isn't cheap). Sure in the case of this calendar app one could bite the bullet and pay the $40 for it, but be prepared to pay another $40 when they release the next version.

2) This is clearly another infomercial from MacRumors! The CEO told us "while the original Fantastical app reinvented calendar apps, the new update reinvents Fantastical". That's their advertising headline. Why am I coming back to this crappy site!?

I get that vibe too..
 

cocky jeremy

macrumors 603
Jul 12, 2008
6,381
6,914
Couldn't they just send out codes?

EDIT: Oh I guess it's free or nothing with promo codes.

You could probably pay them for a promo code and the code given would be free. Pretty sure it's limited how many they get per month though.
 

praetorian909

macrumors 6502
Aug 4, 2004
279
91
wow, it's currently $50AUD and that's with the 20% off?!

What were they thinking when they priced this? Yes it's probably a very nice calendar app - but it's just a calendar app!

Such a shame it's so badly overpriced. I guarantee they'd more than quadruple their market if they make it a flat $10.

Yes but that would net them less money, 4x$10x4 is still less than $50. Just sayin' ;)
 

nutmac

macrumors 603
Mar 30, 2004
6,138
7,586
While this looks great for those who need all these features, all I really wanted was a Yosemite update for the existing menu bar app. They should rename it Fantastical Lite and bring this UI to it--I'd pay 5 or 10 bucks for the upgrade. At $40 for this I think I'll pass.

Right. I can't help but think that Fantastical 2 should have priced at the same price level as Fantastical 1, at $19.99. I know many people poo poo In App Purchase here, but I think IAP is a perfect model for Fantastical. $19.99 full calendar window and $19.99 for multiple calendar sets and other business oriented features, and $29.99 for both.
 

DanGoh

macrumors 6502
Apr 6, 2014
366
506
Right. I can't help but think that Fantastical 2 should have priced at the same price level as Fantastical 1, at $19.99. I know many people poo poo In App Purchase here, but I think IAP is a perfect model for Fantastical. $19.99 full calendar window and $19.99 for multiple calendar sets and other business oriented features, and $29.99 for both.


OR.........just $20 one time purchase for it all.
 

shartypants

macrumors 6502a
Jul 27, 2010
922
60
The price is way to high, can't justify the little extra features over the stock calendar app.
 

Lost Hills

macrumors regular
Sep 25, 2014
208
155
Mine also crashes during setup, when it gets to adding icloud/google accounts. I've tried a dozen times, and it's crashed every attempt.
I solved the crash on start up issue, I installed the trial, set that up, then installed the App Store version on top of the trial version. Works fine now.
 

Asthmatic Kitty

macrumors regular
Sep 29, 2014
149
189
Have a question about the iOS app, which I'd appreciate if someone could answer:

Do Fantastical 2 and the stock calendar app play nicely together? If I create an event in fantastical does it sync across to the calendar app? I'm going to buy an Apple Watch, so the stock calendar integration is important to me, and won't bother buying Fantastical for iOS if it's a separate entity altogether.
 

iMcLovin

macrumors 68000
Feb 11, 2009
1,963
898
been looking forward to this, I always felt Fantastical was the best calendar - and Fantastical 1 just looked outdated. With the new look and new features I gladly pay 40$. If you use your calendar every day on a regular basis and will enjoy it for years, I dont understand why paying 40$ is a problem. Most people dont have problems paying twice as much for a game you finish within a short amount of time or a few beers at the pub. Consider it the best calendar app available without question -the price is fair.
 

kuwxman

Cancelled
Jul 25, 2009
850
958
Fantastical is my favorite calendar app by far, but $40 is ridiculous. I caved and spent the $20 on the Fantastical 2 for iPhone app while back to go alongside my original Fantastical for Mac app. I simply can not justify another $40 for a fresh coat of paint. Hopefully they lower the price sometime in the future. If so, I'll pick it up. Until then, the original Fantastical will do.
 

John.B

macrumors 601
Jan 15, 2008
4,194
705
Holocene Epoch
Have a question about the iOS app, which I'd appreciate if someone could answer:

Do Fantastical 2 and the stock calendar app play nicely together? If I create an event in fantastical does it sync across to the calendar app? I'm going to buy an Apple Watch, so the stock calendar integration is important to me, and won't bother buying Fantastical for iOS if it's a separate entity altogether.

They share the same calendar, stored in iCloud.

Fantastical supports features like duplicating events and up to five alerts, while the stock iOS Calendar app supports Travel Time and has proper location integration with your contacts, Apple maps, etc.
 

497902

Suspended
Sep 25, 2010
905
229
Fantastical 2 seems to have many advantages over Apple Calendar, but here's the deal:

Apple: Calendar + an entire operating system including many other apps (Free)
Flexibits: Fantastical 2 ($39.99) (Oh, but you can get the same thing for just $2.99 on your iPhone)

Flexibitis really needs to reconsider its pricing policy, otherwise many people aren't going to be interested.
 

mw360

macrumors 68020
Aug 15, 2010
2,057
2,458
I owned Coda 1. When Coda 2 got out, I had the choice of getting upgrade price, not full price. And Coda 2 was even cheaper (if my memory serves me) when it was released compared to fantastical 2.

And one more thing, Panic makes really great software. But not only that, try opening up a support ticket for one of their products. Pretty soon you will get a response. Now try doing that with flexibits. A greedy developer is a greedy developer.

Pay for it, but dont get ur hopes up for an upgrade, or even for some support. Want an upgrade? Please pay 50$ :D

If my memory serves Coda2 didn't have an upgrade price for existing users. It was the same price for everyone but discounted temporarily, I think from $99 to about $70. I'm pretty sure that's because MAS rules prevent offering upgrade pricing even to direct customers.
 

Northgrove

macrumors 65816
Aug 3, 2010
1,156
448
I must really be behind the times, I find the default OS X Calendar application sufficient :/
Comes with cool new OS X Yosemite design too! ;)

Yes, I agree. The only thing I'm really lusting for is convenient new events using natural language but they're still very conservative there with the international support. :( I'd like Swedish support and you'd think they'd at least cover Europe by now. We use something like.. a combination of say five words when telling dates and times?

Yes yes, whiny perhaps but this is a $50 app and that's one of its main features. Going from 5 supported languages to 6 in a major update demanding repayment doesn't cut it, sorry.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.