Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Can someone clear it up for me please? I have a Samsung quick charger I kept from my Note 7. Can I not just plug the 8+ cable into it? Why do I need to buy the USB C to lightning cable?
 
Can someone clear it up for me please? I have a Samsung quick charger I kept from my Note 7. Can I not just plug the 8+ cable into it? Why do I need to buy the USB C to lightning cable?

That’s usb c to usb c. It won’t work with lightning ports on Apple products.
[doublepost=1506175276][/doublepost]
Can someone clear it up for me please? I have a Samsung quick charger I kept from my Note 7. Can I not just plug the 8+ cable into it? Why do I need to buy the USB C to lightning cable?

Plus Apple hasn’t added the support for “QC” on the devices. So we get fast charge.
 
All this discussion about fast charging. So, I looked up the OnePlus 5 and its Dash Charge speed, and it reaches 60% charge in 30 minutes - for a 3300 mAh battery! For Apple to advertise a 50% charge of an 1820 mAh battery needing 30 minutes as "fast charging" is laughable.

And oh, OnePlus includes both the Dash charger as well as the special cable in the box.

It is difficult to determine how fast it really is, but I agree 50% in 30 minutes is very unimpressive.

Based on my results, if we perform simple linear extrapolation up to 90% on the iPhone 8+ I tested:

0% - charges at 18W (assumption)
70% - charges at ~9V x 1.3A.= 11.7W
90% - charges at ~9V x 1.1A = 10W (projected)

After 90% I am going to assume it drops off to 5V and charges much more slowly.

From the iPhone 8 tear down, we know that the battery is at 3.82V.
From a Verge article, we know that the battery size is 2.675Ah.

We might assume the iPhone 8+ has a capacity of 10.21Wh. 90% of that is 9.2Wh

Based on the linear projection model above, for some time t, using the trapezoid area formula

1/2 x t x (18 + 10) = 14t = 9.2Wh, which would mean t = 0.66h or about 40 minutes.

TLDR; If all that Math theorycraft is right, then the iPhone 8+ under “fast charging” should charge 0-90% in 40 minutes. Let me know if my math is bad.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
By being informed about tech:

”In order to make this work, you'll have to separately purchase Apple's (or a third party's) 29-watt USB-C charger and USB-C to lightning cable”
https://www.engadget.com/2017/09/13/iphone-fast-charge-requires-different-adapter/

”9. Testing conducted by Apple in August 2017 using preproduction iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus units and software and accessory Apple USB-C Power Adapters (29W Model A1540, 61W Model A1718, 87W Model A1719).”
https://www.apple.com/iphone-8/specs/


Q2: My device doesn't have Quick Charge. Is there a way I can get it?
A: Unfortunately not. Qualcomm Quick Charge technology is designed into a product by the manufacturer”
https://www.qualcomm.com/products/features/quick-charge/faq
https://www.qualcomm.com/media/documents/files/quick-charge-device-list.pdf

Apple does not list support for QC on their website nor display the QC logo anywhere.

Ok how about this, do you know the actual numbers that really matter. How long will the new phones take to fully charge from like 20% to 100% and how long does it take the old phones to do the same. So what are we gaining in a full charge cycle in real time hours/minutes? I know they say 50% in 30 mins. But we know that last 50% isn’t going to take 30 more min since it will be going slower...
 
Posted these results in another thread yesterday as I missed this one
This is on the 8 Plus using Apples 29w charger from a powered down state, waking the screen at 5 minute intervals
 

Attachments

  • FC706440-E3C8-4499-9F98-1EF7E49149B2.jpeg
    FC706440-E3C8-4499-9F98-1EF7E49149B2.jpeg
    1 MB · Views: 319
  • Like
Reactions: jpn
It is difficult to determine how fast it really is, but I agree 50% in 30 minutes is very unimpressive.

Based on my results, if we perform simple linear extrapolation up to 90% on the iPhone 8+ I tested:

0% - charges at 18W (assumption)
70% - charges at ~9V x 1.3A.= 11.7W
90% - charges at ~9V x 1.1A = 10W (projected)

After 90% I am going to assume it drops off to 5V and charges much more slowly.

From the iPhone 8 tear down, we know that the battery is at 3.82V.
From a Verge article, we know that the battery size is 2.675A.

We might assume the iPhone 8+ has a capacity of 10.21Wh. 90% of that is 9.2Wh

Based on the linear projection model above, for some time t, using the trapezoid area formula

1/2 x t x (18 + 10) = 14t = 9.2Wh, which would mean t = 0.66h or about 40 minutes.

TLDR; If all that Math theorycraft is right, then the iPhone 8+ under “fast charging” should charge 0-90% in 40 minutes. Let me know if my math is bad.


Holy smokes in English please..haha so I just asked this above but wanted to know from 20%-100% how long will the IP8+ take in actual minutes, the Numbers that matter to us non math guys. And how is that compared to last year models, like the time it takes the 7+?
 
Posted these results in another thread yesterday as I missed this one
This is on the 8 Plus using Apples 29w charger from a powered down state, waking the screen at 5 minute intervals

2 freaking hours from 0-100%, so what was last years 7+ do you know? So basically we get 50% in 30 min and the next 50% in 1.5 hours.
 
Crazy right?! Going to retest with a standard 12w charger and compare the results. Pretty underwhelmed

That’s the last 50% in 1.5 hours.:( they should name it “faster than last model charge” not fast charge. Lol But I get it, it’s for needing enough juice if u r going out when u only have 30 min to charge it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnyslats
I wouldn’t judge Apple too harshly here - pretty sure it’s not safe to charge a battery at high speeds when it is almost full - slowing down the charge at high percentages is a good move on Apple’s part, as it will help to extend the life of the battery.
 
I wouldn’t judge Apple too harshly here - pretty sure it’s not safe to charge a battery at high speeds when it is almost full - slowing down the charge at high percentages is a good move on Apple’s part, as it will help to extend the life of the battery.

Well ya I get that, but will it be negotiating like QC3.0 so we don’t lose power and heat that bad boy up? I’m just saying compared to QC3.0 it’s not as good.
 
Posted these results in another thread yesterday as I missed this one
This is on the 8 Plus using Apples 29w charger from a powered down state, waking the screen at 5 minute intervals

Thanks, this is really useful information - it looks pretty disappointing. I assume you used Apple’s official USB-C to lightning cable?

It’s very surprising that after 30 minutes it’s only charged to 43%. That’s quite off from Apple’s marketing of 50%. Apple should definitely clarify on this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpn and BigMcGuire
Well ya I get that, but will it be negotiating like QC3.0 so we don’t lose power and heat that bad boy up? I’m just saying compared to QC3.0 it’s not as good.

Well I am guessing QC 3.0 also slows down at high percentages. Apple’s fast charging claims appear to be underperforming here though even at the 50% mark which is disappointing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Thanks, this is really useful information - it looks pretty disappointing. I assume you used Apple’s official USB-C to lightning cable?

It’s very surprising that after 30 minutes it’s only charged to 43%. That’s quite off from Apple’s marketing of 50%. Apple should definitely clarify on this.
Indeed. Didn’t Activate airplane mode as I wanted a ‘real world’ test so suppose this explains some of the difference vs Apple’s own testing. That said, this was several hours after turning on the device and had nothing updating in the background etc
 
I wouldn’t judge Apple too harshly here - pretty sure it’s not safe to charge a battery at high speeds when it is almost full - slowing down the charge at high percentages is a good move on Apple’s part, as it will help to extend the life of the battery.

Even the OnePlus Dash charge has that behavior to protect the battery, but the overall speed is much better, even outperforming Samsung's fast charging. Their proprietary protocol enables them to deliver those results.
 
Well I am guessing QC 3.0 also slows down at high percentages. Apple’s fast charging claims appear to be underperforming here though even at the 50% mark which is disappointing.

Yes it also slows, but it goes to 80% Pretty fast still.
 
wireless charge is super slow .... i though ut fast

More than fast enough for me. Would work for you if you did while sleeping.

You do sleep don’t you?:rolleyes:
[doublepost=1506181285][/doublepost]
I think that is what it was made for, sleeping. But at that point, what does a cord or wireless make a difference since it is just sitting there you know.

Agreed that plugging is works fine, been doing it for 10 years but I have also had a port go bad so less wear on the lightning connector is good enough reason for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
It is difficult to determine how fast it really is, but I agree 50% in 30 minutes is very unimpressive.

Based on my results, if we perform simple linear extrapolation up to 90% on the iPhone 8+ I tested:

0% - charges at 18W (assumption)
70% - charges at ~9V x 1.3A.= 11.7W
90% - charges at ~9V x 1.1A = 10W (projected)

After 90% I am going to assume it drops off to 5V and charges much more slowly.

From the iPhone 8 tear down, we know that the battery is at 3.82V.
From a Verge article, we know that the battery size is 2.675Ah.

We might assume the iPhone 8+ has a capacity of 10.21Wh. 90% of that is 9.2Wh

Based on the linear projection model above, for some time t, using the trapezoid area formula

1/2 x t x (18 + 10) = 14t = 9.2Wh, which would mean t = 0.66h or about 40 minutes.

TLDR; If all that Math theorycraft is right, then the iPhone 8+ under “fast charging” should charge 0-90% in 40 minutes. Let me know if my math is bad.



As soon as my bettery drains down to 0% i will let you know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: masotime
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.