Rules in anything visual are meant as starting points. Once you learn them, then you break them more successfully. I could dig out a book and list things, but that is no fun. I will comment on things as I see them in this thread and propose some of the formal design rules as topics for future challenge topics.
Probably made things clear as mud...
Dale
This is an example of what I meant by "make it look intentional" in an earlier post. The out of focus areas at the top and right of the original distract from the image. If I had left the white stone at the left, it would have intruded into the image as well. Cropping removed these elements. If something is very close to the edge of a frame or running off it, leave it in or take it out depending on what you want, but make it look intentional and not an afterthought of something you overlooked.
Working with a Point and Shoot forces me to do this in post.
Dale
Probably made things clear as mud...
This is an example of what I meant by "make it look intentional" in an earlier post.
Thanks, Dale. We played in mud when we were kids. Why not as adults?
Maxxamillian -- I like the image of the cycle as an abstract piece. It took a long time and a lot of struggle for me to figure out what it was. My problem was that it is so dark that I just could not make it out. Perhaps if you lightened it a bit.........
Bruce
I do like my darks
I worry about how my pics show on other's monitors. You take some great pics...which leads me to believe you are viewing on a calibrated monitor...can you give me an idea of what you are using? I trend towards dark on most of my pics and worry that I overdo it...
20mm wide angle on 35mm b/w didn't do it near enough justice.
One of my design teachers told us to make elements look intentional. The interpretation here would be to give more breathing room and let the orange flow freely.
Dale
Originally Posted by pdxflint;
20mm wide angle on 35mm b/w (film) didn't do it near enough justice.
What's that???????????
I shoot with a Nikon D50 with the Nikon 28-200 VR lens. My machine is a 17" MBP with Leopard. No external monitor. I use Photoshop Elements 6 and (rarely) iPhoto. Other than cropping, I do minimal PP, and then usually to fix the blemishes. Sometimes I will adjust lighting. While I might convert to sepia or B&W, I never mess with the colors themselves. The only PP I ever do on my mineral images is cropping.
I would suggest that if you think you might be "overdoing it" then go with your gut. Art is very subjective. I think it works better when we allow it to tell us what to do. (That is my Zen thought for the day.)
The only thing about any of your images that has ever not worked for me is lighting. You compositions are truly outstanding.
As others have mentioned, this took me by surprise. I loved the colors and kept looking until I realized it was a motorcycle. Great use of an unusual perspective to turn an object into art. You are really good at this. The Painting with Light entry in the last photo contest was stunning. At least to me. I don't judge... It looked like a winner to me.
Dale
Okay... ha, ha!
Maxxamillian, I've really liked your 'darker' tones. They display well on my MBP 15" matte screen. Just one or two of the portrait shots have been maybe a tad darkish, but mostly they have seemed very warm, and full of interesting tones, very artistic and creative. The cycle shots have been right on for me. I recognized this last one immediately - maybe because I've been a rider in the past and my eye instantly picks up certain details like the rear tire, frame tubing, wire wheels and footpegs... which draw me into the rest of the shot for some closer examination. If anything, I want more sharpness in this one, whereas your style seems to scream "smoothness".
There is a good chance that this is the only wildlife photo I've taken. Chalk it up to a lack of patience on my part for this kind of thing. I was really waiting for a bear, a moose, and a mountain lion to come into this clearing and put on a spectacular (National Geographic award winning) fight. Instead, during the whole 20 minutes I waited, I got this little guy...
Its a bit light
Sorry I couldn't resist
Maxxamillian -- I don't think there is a problem with either monitor. My pictures display and print virtually identically. I think there is just a difference in style and taste.
I hate chipmunks, but your picture is beautiful. It was worth the wait. Regardless of what Chappers says, I think the lighting is just right.
On a different note--your recent harbor series have been captivating....I really enjoy seeing your work Thanks for the feedback.
I hate chipmunks, but your picture is beautiful. It was worth the wait. Regardless of what Chappers says, I think the lighting is just right.
How on earth can someone hate a chipmunk?? Unless you grew up hearing them singing...
The butterfly is pretty good given the circumstances. My eye keeps getting pulled to the lower right. That one stalk is very distracting to me. I think the image would work much better if you got rid of that.
Put up some of your other boats. Sometimes others see things we don't.
===================
Here is my next entry.
I really like the use of color and motion in this shot. .... Nice work.
Dale
Dale -- Thank you. I had some struggles deciding how close to crop this. Perhaps I have some hidden sense of design?
Bruce
=======================
Maxxamillian -- I'm Bruce's son, Jacob. I really like your photo of the motorcycle. I think that the pictures flows very nicely. The dark against the bright red works very nicely. I looked at the photographs on your web site, and I also thought they are all unique and interesting.
Jake
My humble contribution.