Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No — one of the biggest corporations on Earth making threats to avoid government oversight would not go down as well with the public as you think it would.

Regardless of what you think of the regulations, that’s not a winning strategy. It would rally people in favour of the regulators, and any politician who “backed down” in the face of those threats would have forever lost any credibility.
The funny thing is you think politicians have any credibility to even lose...
 
The funny thing is you think politicians have credibility to begin with.

They need to be seen as credible to somebody; not necessarily to me.

There are plenty of politicians who I don’t personally think are credible, but they have groups who support them. The ongoing US presidential campaigns have featured plenty of them.
 
That Core Technology Fee is BS and I hope the EU forces Apple to knock it off. We the consumers pay Apple's Core Technology Fee when we buy expensive devices at 35-45% markup. That's enough.
At its height, Fortnite had about 120 million iPhone users. Generally assuming about a quarter of these players live in EU, that's 30 million users or €14.5 million/year.

We will see if Epic thinks it can make more than that to justify avoiding App Store's new lowered 17% fee for consumable IAP.

As for whether the Core Technology Fee is BS or not, you are not exactly wrong. But at the same time, 15-30% commission Apple takes from app purchase and subscription have been subsidizing Apple's development team. So Apple probably is entitled to some fees. Apple's calculus for €0.50 per app installs above 1 million isn't entirely ridiculous, but there should be a cap.
 
That Core Technology Fee is BS and I hope the EU forces Apple to knock it off. We the consumers pay Apple's Core Technology Fee when we buy expensive devices at 35-45% markup. That's enough.
The amount can be debated, but it’s undeniable that there are ongoing, recurring costs for the infrastructure and management of services Apple provides to apps whether they’re in the App Store or not. The data stored in iCloud, the security scans, the notarisation service they’re now introducing, the billions of push notifications sent every day. These need servers, bandwidth, and engineers to maintain/grow them. These costs grow the more an app is downloaded and used. Why shouldn’t they charge for these costs accordingly?
 
This Sweeney guy really wants a free ride on Apple's products. Of course pocketing any extra profits himself, not passing any savings to customers.
If Apple is not providing the app store infrastructure, why do they deserve a cut?

You bought your phone, it's yours. You're downloading an app from Epic's app store. Apple has no part in this transaction anymore.

It's the same as buying software for your computer. You buy a copy of, say, Turbo Tax, for your PC or Mac. You download it from Intuit's website, and install it. Why should Apple get a cut of that?

Apple came up with this insane concept that they need to be paid by developers to write code for some of their devices. It's a completely insane idea that took off because obviously companies want to make more money, but the reality is if you're not using Apple's infrastructure to distribute the software, Apple doesn't deserve a single penny.
 
If Apple is not providing the app store infrastructure, why do they deserve a cut?

You bought your phone, it's yours. You're downloading an app from Epic's app store. Apple has no part in this transaction anymore.

It's the same as buying software for your computer. You buy a copy of, say, Turbo Tax, for your PC or Mac. You download it from Intuit's website, and install it. Why should Apple get a cut of that?

Apple came up with this insane concept that they need to be paid by developers to write code for some of their devices. It's a completely insane idea that took off because obviously companies want to make more money, but the reality is if you're not using Apple's infrastructure to distribute the software, Apple doesn't deserve a single penny.
They certainly do deserve a cut. Epic is using Apple’s development tools to create their software; they’ve also invested immense time in documenting all the APIs they’ve developed for developers (along with developing them). That’s a very large investment of which Epic is taking advantage.
 
If Apple is not providing the app store infrastructure, why do they deserve a cut?

You bought your phone, it's yours. You're downloading an app from Epic's app store. Apple has no part in this transaction anymore.

It's the same as buying software for your computer. You buy a copy of, say, Turbo Tax, for your PC or Mac. You download it from Intuit's website, and install it. Why should Apple get a cut of that?

Apple came up with this insane concept that they need to be paid by developers to write code for some of their devices. It's a completely insane idea that took off because obviously companies want to make more money, but the reality is if you're not using Apple's infrastructure to distribute the software, Apple doesn't deserve a single penny.
So if Apple is providing infrastructure then they do get a cut? All apps are being scanned for malware. There’s the new notarisation service. Presumably apps outside the App Store can still use iCloud storage and database services. Not to mention the billions of push notifications sent every day. Servers, bandwidth, engineers. All this incurs ongoing, recurring costs. There’s more infrastructure that makes up the platform used by apps than just the App Store.
 
Even as Epic is planning for an Epic Games app store on iOS, Epic CEO Tim Sweeney has been criticizing Apple's planned changes. Sweeney said that Apple's App Store changes are a "devious new instance of malicious compliance" and are aimed at thwarting the Digital Markets Act
Dude got exactly what he wanted and he’s still not happy
 
LOL. You lost billons of dollars and a big portion of your fan base is gone.

Best of luck to whomever is still playing this

Looks like they shouldn't be concerned about this though. I never saw the appeal, but apparently millions of others did and still do...

 
Looks like they shouldn't be concerned about this though. I never saw the appeal, but apparently millions of others did and still do...

The OG update back in November really helped them.
 
That Core Technology Fee is BS and I hope the EU forces Apple to knock it off. We the consumers pay Apple's Core Technology Fee when we buy expensive devices at 35-45% markup. That's enough.
Apple makes a platform that companies make money on.
Apple charges companies that make a profit on that platform to use that platform.
This is not complex or unfair.
 
If there is a law that requires Apple to do business with Epic, or with Spotify, other than market forces, then I oppose that law.
I am concerned about having Apple decide what is and is not appropriate content to be used on the phone that I have purchased from them. Especially since they are not being consistent in their censorship.

That's why we need government intervention.
 
I am concerned about having Apple decide what is and is not appropriate content to be used on the phone that I have purchased from them. Especially since they are not being consistent in their censorship.

That's why we need government intervention.
If you don't like what Apple is doing, don't buy their products. There are other options, Apple doesn't own the cell phone market.
 
So if Apple is providing infrastructure then they do get a cut? All apps are being scanned for malware. There’s the new notarisation service. Presumably apps outside the App Store can still use iCloud storage and database services. Not to mention the billions of push notifications sent every day. Servers, bandwidth, engineers. All this incurs ongoing, recurring costs. There’s more infrastructure that makes up the platform used by apps than just the App Store.
Well then Apple should bill for these services in particular.

iCloud storage is already paid for by the end user; this shouldn't be billed for.

Notarization and malware scanning is already free on MacOS.

They could charge for push notifications though; make them free if the app is in Apple's store as an incentive. I can totally be on board with this as in this case Apple IS providing infrastructure.

But to just be able to install the app from a third-party app store on your device? Apple shouldn't get anything for that.
 
Dude got exactly what he wanted and he’s still not happy
images-19.jpeg

- Sweeny's Tweet summarized
 
I am concerned about having Apple decide what is and is not appropriate content to be used on the phone that I have purchased from them. Especially since they are not being consistent in their censorship.

That's why we need government intervention.
Get one of the hundreds of phones that run android then. If the device requirements don’t meet your specs, get one that does.

That’s much better than government regulation. (But I suppose some see busting companies for doing their business legally in the job of government)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.