As far as you can tell....okay, so we can agree to disagree on opinions personal preferences that you said to leave at the door
why are people here always nitpicking words? english is not my main language. and an individual cant ever stumble upon an objective truth? jesus, think a little, this is not a pissing contest.
as far as i can tell, as far as i can read, as far as a can hear, as far as a can see, theres no person in the world that would deny the polish of ios and its apps opposed to android. it even goes down to the little things like opening animations or that twitter animation when it starts up. wanna talk about the tablets apps?
Now how about you show us in reality some of those apps that are more polished and look better. In terms of development, it's not complicated to know why iOS gets developed first. There's only one device and platform.
bgr, chrome vs safari, suntrust, pandora, many games (the most lucrative section), facebook stutters much more, apps like sportscenter are laggier, Tweetbot, LinkedIn, MegaReader, VSCO Cam, Kickstarter, loungeBuddy, diptic PDQ, games like plants vs zombies 2, garage band, iMovie, Keynote, pages, Reeder. this is not hard to grasp, ios has 50% faster cpu and much faster nand performance than android. they open faster, they stay in ram longer, they are smoother and more fluid. i dnot even now why im mentioning this, this is supposed to be common knowledge.
exactly, one device and platform, which renders this comparison absurd and unfair. android shouldnt even be compared to ios.
Time and money are less involved, once released the audiance will be a good gauge as to whether it makes sense to then go tackle other hardware devices and the nuances that make each unique on the Android OS. There's vary little impact to us in the real world. Again, I made the switch from iOS to Android and there was/is only one app of the hundreds I have that isn't available. In the end, most apps either launch or are available very soon after on all platforms.
you mean little nuances like
this?
yeah, absolutely no impact in the real world, except increasing pain for developers to even code for android because of the sheer number of different hardware, most very cheap and low performing, or google barely working plan to support its devices for 18 months, to the widening gap in gpu performance... yeah, no real world impact
I'm not dismissing it, I'm still waiting on the real world user experience that's been so greatly improved by the charts and graphs you've shared touting better graphics performance on an iOS device with these new processors. Again, something beyond your personal preference and observations. Something not in graph-bench testing results.
well, the graphs show a8 is 50% faster than snapdragon 800. looking at the
real world test of the phonebuff i posted earlier, iphone is easily 50% faster
also, previously shown videos between nexus 5 and iphone 5s shows that the iphone 5s achieves more fps, hence the game is noticeably smoother, which isnt weird considering the resolution, but it impacts ux.
did you look at that metal article? probably didnt, you would change your rhetoric a little bit. and thats on already designed games. what about games designed with metal and swift in mind, coming 2015? by then, almost half of iphone user base (500 mill) will be running a7 or a8 chips.
In terms of HP on cars, yes, it does get lost on some as in the real world, most people won't ever even use the full capability of their now 400hp cars. Most live in the world of torque where races are really won and lost and the user experience actually lives. That's why there's an old addage that people buy horsepower but experience torque. Hyundai/Kia learned this with their Sonota/Optima. In 2015 they dropped HP and moved the power band to more usable real-world experienced ranges.
exactly, thats the exact reason why apple uses 2 fast cores as opposed to androids using 4 slow cores, while 99.9% of apps use only one core. real ux right?
thats also the reason why people are amazed by tesla
Yes it is. Either the updates and advances Apple made within their processing power of the iPhone is used in the real-world and able to be seen by the average user or it's not and it's dismissed as not making an appreciable difference.
its visible by the average users, hence the constant world wide
ios is more polished, fluid, less laggy rhetoirc, along the fact that he apps open faster and games play better. what about the developers?
I'm totally future focused but no one gets a free-ride to "ramp up". Deliver today or you won't be here tomorrow.
be careful about that, you may lose some diamonds in rough
In the real world, I expect all these advancements to deliver today.
this expectation is beyond reasonable and it makes me question your statements about even participating in real world economy.
You've yet to show anyone that in the real world. All great stuff dude and I'm glad the technology is exciting, but where is it making a difference to users today? The top line phones today don't shudder or hesitate so let's not split milliseconds there. I've used plenty and deploy many to my people. Show me where all these graphs and graphics are making a difference.
its much easier to code for ios, you have more cpu/gpu power/performance on your hand, apps launch faster, stay longer in ram, have better visuals, mostly because of the coreanimations, apple has the ability to further optimize code because of the uniformity of ios hardware and in-house soc designs, longer support for old devices, gaming is better on ios, both from performance and exclusive titles standpoint, metal 2015, if they replaced open gl, they probably replace opencl, using gpu for general computing task with lower overhead. none of these things is even possible on android. what about h.265 support in a8? is that real world enough for you?
also, the lag thing. android is laggy by design, which means it doesnt use animations to cover for lag, eg. waiting for cpu to finish its thing like os. that might change with android l, but i doubt, google was never about design, more about utility, just like you are.
i want it today!.
----------
back to my original point...all those kids playing Grand Theft Auto are thanking Apple.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Roll Eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:"
That should be their new slogan. The iPhone 6, the best high end smart phone for all those dumb kids addicted to games such as Grand Theft Auto. Parents everywhere solute you.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Roll Eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:"
Apple, the Higher Education Device.
Image
you're the one entertaining your kids with a phone
you really cant see beyond your nose?
and as far as i can see, apple is the only one really pushing both education and corporate
If anything the 64 bit iphone bottlenecks the 1 gb of ram that the iPhone has, that's why there are so many issues with lag, stuttering , and the devices rebooting themselves
you somehow mixed android with ios
Seriously most people are not serious gamers on there devices, real world usage is not depicted by gpu intensive games....on the other hand why does the iPhone 6 plus heat up too much on intense games and sometimes has to reboot itself .....piece of crap in real world usage .....
yeah, things like that about apple would never go viral on the internet...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Roll Eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:"
weird how im not seeing anything about that.
(sarcasm alert in some of the sentences above)