You remember wrong because you are uninformed on this subject.
Microsoft's $150 million was part of a settlement for a patent dispute that had been going on with Microsoft and Apple for a decade.
You're kidding right? You're making it sounds like Apple
allowed MS to pay them $150 million to settle.
At that time Apple were not even remotely in any position of power. By most accounts they were mere months (weeks?) away from bankruptcy. Microsoft could have easily stalled the negotiations and allowed Apple to go under and Apple could not have done a thing about it.
You've got it around the wrong way - Microsoft invested the money and as a result of that Apple withdrew their complaint and agreed to the cross-patent agreement. Microsoft in turn agreed to produce Office for the Mac for a minimum of 5 years.
Microsoft were at their lofty heights after their massive success with Windows 95 and Apple were in no position of power whatsoever.
I did not even think that even the most rabid Apple fan would try and turn that situation around in Apple's favour.
----------
Irrelevant, and reaching.
China has a billion person population, with a GDP per capita of $5,400, compared to the USA's $48,400.
Assuming the Pareto principle, 200 million Chinese might be able to afford an iPhone
Firstly, China has about 1.4 billion people and you probably have a couple of hundred million Mandarin speakers around the world outside of China which would also benefit from these features...
So you're claiming that Apple do not really care about emerging markets and then go on to state that there are 200 million potential Chinese customers of the iPhone?
Apple don't care about 200 million extra iPhone users?