Because Megapixels only allows you to have a bigger photo, not a better one. It's about the lens/light sensor. Heck the New HTC One only has a 4 Megapixel camera, they're using what they call "Ultrapixels"
How do ultrapixels differ?
Because Megapixels only allows you to have a bigger photo, not a better one. It's about the lens/light sensor. Heck the New HTC One only has a 4 Megapixel camera, they're using what they call "Ultrapixels"
I wouldn't take much notice of drop test results unless they perform the droptest a large amount of times. Doing a one off drop, both handsets would have fallen differently.
Cant understand all the hatred for plastic! Means I can use my phone without a case without worrying about it getting a few scratches. A new back for a few ££ and its as good as new!
How do ultrapixels differ?
According to HTC it allows each pixel to capture 300% more light than the leading 13MP cameras.
I would like the Note 3 to look like this also.
Unless there will be onscreen buttons, neither the S4 or Note will look like that.
I would personally love to see more Android phones go metal. I saw a drop test on Android authority between the S3 and the iPhone 5 and the S3 didn't do very well. Sure, scratches were more apparent on the aluminum back of the iPhone compared to the plastic on the S3. But that is not nearly as big of a deal as a shattered screen. And the aluminum construction of the iPhone helped it keep its shape when it fell, making it more difficult for the impact to shatter the screen. However, the plastic on the S3 made the frame deform easier and thus cracking the screen easier. And personally, I would much rather have a scratch on the back of my phone rather than a shattered screen.
But either way I will probably end up getting a case anyways. But it would be nice to feel more confident without a case if I decided to go that route.
I just can't see Samsung moving away from a physical home button just yet. Too big of a risk
Edit: unless they implement a easy alternative that can replace the home button. Muscle memory for the majority is to have a home button ala iPhone style
The samsung invite did have a solid metal '4' in it.. and the entire poster was focused on it.. I think they're going metal.
As far as the camera is concerned, the camera on the S3 was a huge strike for me. I think it's awful. Same goes for the screen. Samsung could put a 100 megapixel camera in the S4 and still screw it up. Say what you want about Apple, one thing I learned from them is the the MP's really aren't everything. Light sensors make a big difference.
That being said, I think Samsung will deliver on the camera and the screen as well. I am really looking forward to seeing the official specs for the S4. If they are a serious improvement than I'm sold. I am more interested in the Note 3, but I will likely buy an S4 for the meantime, then sell it for a Note this fall and keep my Lumia 920 as a backup.
Essentially a lower resolution sensor can often times mean better quality pictures (better quality here is different from higher resolution as they are completely different). As long as the sensor stays the same size, that means the photodiode themselves will increase in size. This allows each pixel to receive more light by itself, just by decreasing resolution. Not sure why they had to add some special name to it.
I don't think I'll be getting the Galaxy S4. I currently have a Galaxy S3 and think it is a great device but my initial plan when switching to Android was to go with the Nexus line for both my tablet and smartphone. I didn't get the Galaxy Nexus because it was very much outdated at the time I bought the S3 but with Google I/O coming I think we can expect either a new smartphone (the rumoured "X Phone"), a spec bump for the Nexus 4 or both and as such it would be an opportunity for me to switch to a Google/Nexus smartphone with the same benefits of my Nexus 7.
I am also not too hot for Samsung as a company at the moment, they have been rubbing me the wrong way as of late, their blatant rip off of Apple's Passbook being the latest offence. It is also virtually certain that since they are such a big OEM they will end up pushing their own Tizen OS with their own ecosystem including all the Samsung apps/services (S-Voice, Samsung Wallet, their store for video, music and magazines, cloud storage, email, browser, etc). I am personally not interested in any of that or in Samsung seeking to replace services and functionality that Google includes in Android by default. I trust Google (and Apple), I don't trust Samsung.
How did they rip off apples passbook?
It is rather obvious that Samsung took a page from Passbook with their app.
Image
Even the icon bears an striking similarity to Apple's. Wether the app itself works better than Passbook is really besides the point. And it seem that Samsung Wallet will not support NFC at launch.
Cant agree with this. I dont think the back has any bearing on how the screen will shatter or not.
They did it with the US version of the Galaxy S2, and many many other phones that year. Just saying.
Image
Yeah, more noise in the pictures. Nice. Exactly what we need.Anyone gonna jump ship come March 14th? The specs (rumored) are quite impressive. I imagine, size wise, it won't be any bigger than the S3. But a 13 megapixel camera? Yikes!
Downwards, yes.What does the S3 have? 8, right?...pretty big jump really.
Read:I hope they don't price the phone too high to compensate for money lost on this trial.
No, nonsense.Big count on pixels with small sensor is just marketing.
They are ULTRApixels!How do ultrapixels differ?