Thank you. I really need to go read that owners thread for a while. I knew about a few of these issues, but I had no idea there were that many.
If you can afford it, I'd get something else, for sure.
Thank you. I really need to go read that owners thread for a while. I knew about a few of these issues, but I had no idea there were that many.
FWIW, I moved from the Nexus 4 to a Note 2 and am very pleased with the change--addressed nearly all of the problems I had with the N4.
If you can afford it, I'd get something else, for sure.
So are the bands around the device real metal, or that fake brush metal, again like the S3?
No. No. No.
Read the post again. Really. I'll even help highlight a few key points, but you should really read the whole thing more thoroughly:
There's a reason why people respond to Samsung's [if true] minor S3-to-S4 upgrade differently than they do to Apple's minor upgrades.
Samsung's smartphone lineup is so much more versatile than Apple's. Samsung has a wide range of phones to cover different sizes and price levels, many of them are current generation, and offer different experiences but still remain smartphones.
With Apple, there is only one screen size that is of current generation. The smaller option is over a year old, and there's no larger screen size at all.
Also, just taking their phones at face value, the S3 offers so much more packed into it than the iPhone 5 -- in other words, it truly is hard for Samsung to introduce many hardware changes (and again, they have other lineups to cover other ground in the smartphone world). Apple, on the other hand, intentionally withholds hardware changes (they don't believe wireless charging is worth it, nor in screen size options, nor NFC, nor notification lights, nor expandable memory, etc.).
Likewise, Samsung doesn't recycle their design for two years, as Apple has been doing, and will likely continue to do with the 5S.
So, is the S3-to-S4 upgrade small? Sure -- as small as the 4S-to-5 upgrade, if you want to really compare. But does Samsung take two years to do it? No.
Samsung simply offers a larger profile of devices that cover a range of different needs. Apple doesn't. That's why when Apple releases that one upgraded iPhone, and it doesn't match up to what people want, they are criticized more harshly for it.
Whereas if Samsung releases that one upgraded Galaxy S, and people don't like it, those people can (if they insist on having a Samsung/TouchWiz device) can go to the Note, the S-Mini. It's this wonderful thing called options.
Even if Samsung only offered the Galaxy S as their only smartphone, people would still have a perfectly legitimate reason to react more favorably to their modest upgrades than to Apple's upgrades. And that's because the Galaxy S already has and does so much more than what an iPhone can do. It genuinely is harder for them to keep adding new things each year.
But of course, that isn't even the case.[
I do like reading your opinions on this board, so don't get too offended. I think your bias against iPhone (despite the fact you said you're now seriously considering it) is showing. It is as close to an S upgrade as you can come. Argue all you want about the iPhone 5 just stretching the screen, but it does wonder for media. And as far as a versatile phone lineup, it really is just the S3 and Note, all others are not created equal and for all intents and purposes never will be. I applaud Samsung for giving us consumers the option, but there really is no point in looking beyond those two.
The reason people are so quick to judge Apple about their S updates is because they are so capable of coming up with these different and unique designs (3GS > 4, 4S > 5) yet they don't. But I don't fault them nor Samsung for sticking w/ a design that wows and sells well.
I applaud Samsung for all that they've put into the GS4. No doubt it will be one of the top selling smartphones this year. Will I get it? No. I personally hated the design of the GS3, and that the GS4 is so similar I definitely will not buy one. Most high end smartphones are more than capable of meeting my needs, so it is all about case at this point for me. If Sony ever brought the XZ to Verizon, or an unlocked CDMA-LTE to the US I would quickly jump ship.
End rant.
I think I read on Engadget its plastic. Samsung should have really stepped it up and used metal.
What I really want to know is Exynos or Qualcomm for the US version.
I think I read on Engadget its plastic. Samsung should have really stepped it up and used metal.
What I really want to know is Exynos or Qualcomm for the US version.
My god... I am still seeing it lag in people's preview videos. What the heck?
It's cool that there are so many features. I keep reading something new each time I read about the device. Go Samsung. Also, kudos to them for getting 4.2.2 (pay attention HTC!)
----------
Wow, look at these S4 iphone5 comparisons: http://www.phonearena.com/news/Samsung-Galaxy-S-4-vs-Apple-iPhone-5-first-look_id40848#7-
The S4 is insanely thin!
Shouldn't the iPhone (7.6mm) be thinner than the S4 (7.9mm)?
Then the Verge says:
TICK: GALAXY S III, TOCK: GALAXY S4
So, okay. Nice try.
By the way, why did you not respond to anything I wrote to you before?
Because i don't necessarily agree that because the screen size is different the S-type classification doesn't apply. Little has changed externally from the predecessor no matter how much you want to spin it. To me its just a Galaxy S3 with 2013 specs and i'm not alone in this impression
I also don't believe just because Samsung makes other phones or because the previous phone was already good enough they're automatically excused. Samsung has ONE flagship product which is updated annually. Full stop. Everything else is either mid-range or low end or a completely different category. Whether they made an already good phone in the previous generation depends on who you ask...to some yes...to others not so much. And whatever other phones they make is irrelevant to the discussion.
As a geek my market segment is the high end flagship of which Samsung's is the Galaxy S4. If i don't like said S4 i have to look elsewhere. I won't be looking at a Galaxy Mini, Galaxy Ace or a Note because they're not flagships nor the same category. Hence my eyes will move on to flagships from other manufacturers like LG, Sony HTC etc.
Fair enough.
Ironically, I'm looking at the possibility of going back to the iPhone.
I think this comparison picture should really put things into perspective. Doesn't sound anything like an S upgrade to me. Note the change in screen size, resolution, battery size, thinness (no S phone ever got thinner nor offered a larger battery), the addition of an IR blaster, less weight (no S phone ever got lighter), different dimensions (do I have to say it again? No S phone ever was sized differently), and etc.
Image
HTC One or iPhone 5 are the phones to get IMHO. Unless you're not an S3 user in which case throw that to the mix.
Sony blew the Xperia Z by not glooding the market with and by using a funky screen.
HTC made a great phone but again question marks on battery life and how good that camera is prevail again
S4...more of the same S3.
iPhone 5 you know what you're getting. For better or worse.
The Exynos 5 Octa lacks an LTE modem, therefore it's safe to say that the US will get a Snapdragon 600/800.
The Exynos 5 Octa lacks an LTE modem, therefore it's safe to say that the US will get a Snapdragon 600/800.
SoC's don't have the modem built in.... They are separate chips.....
SoCs can have an embedded modem/radio. Snapdragon come to mind.