It’s like they don’t care if people buy their phones...Pixel 4 owners no longer get unlimited original picture quality storage. Wow.
It’s like they don’t care if people buy their phones...Pixel 4 owners no longer get unlimited original picture quality storage. Wow.
You say that jokingly but in a lot of ways I think that’s true. The Pixel is aimed at tech enthusiasts and stock android phones. Definitely not aimed at the masses. Their first shot at that market was the 3a line IMO.It’s like they don’t care if people buy their phones...
I don't get unlimited original picture quality storage from Apple on my 11 pro max or from Samsung for my Note 10+It’s like they don’t care if people buy their phones...
I don't get unlimited original picture quality storage from Apple on my 11 pro max or from Samsung for my Note 10+
Sure but they offer their own benefits and features. Unlimited picture storage was always one of the features offered by Pixel. They’re removing something, not really adding anything new, and keeping the same price. It’s also annoying because it’s a transparent move. They’re clearly trying to force people into using their Google one storage plans that has so far been a flop.I don't get unlimited original picture quality storage from Apple on my 11 pro max or from Samsung for my Note 10+
I don't get unlimited original picture quality storage from Apple on my 11 pro max or from Samsung for my Note 10+
I don’t know. I started using it and £16 for a year of 100gb is pretty decent. Especially as they gave me a home mini which I sold for £21 profit.Sure but they offer their own benefits and features. Unlimited picture storage was always one of the features offered by Pixel. They’re removing something, not really adding anything new, and keeping the same price. It’s also annoying because it’s a transparent move. They’re clearly trying to force people into using their Google one storage plans that has so far been a flop.
I didn’t say it was bad, it was just a transparent move.I don’t know. I started using it and £16 for a year of 100gb is pretty decent. Especially as they gave me a home mini which I sold for £21 profit.
I dunno, it's missing an ultra wide camera, you cannot recreate that with software.
We’ve known for some time it wouldn’t be a continuous thing and would end. I’m not defending Google, just don’t see it as that big of a deal.I didn’t say it was bad, it was just a transparent move.
Thats pretty much the advice I give to anyone who isn’t rabid about ultra wide angle like I am. I’m bonkers for it even with the trade offs. And I admit there are trade offs. But I don’t care because right now the ultra wide is sort of a cool extra on the Note and S10 and the iPhones and LG’s.Surprising Google didn't include an ultra-wide camera to go with their distortion-free computational photography.
https://people.csail.mit.edu/yichangshih/wide_angle_portrait/#paper
But maybe it's better to hold off and get it right rather than including a mediocre one like the iPhone 11 Pro with subpar quality and barrel distortion.
Did you watch the presentation? Did you see the tech involved? Did you see the the Soli implementation? Can you imagine the the use cases?
Did you see the new Face Unlock? IMHO it is better than what is on my 11 pro max.
Did you see the camera section?
Did you see the Google Assistant portion? That alone should suffice....then best digital assistant on a smartphone. Then throw in the Google AI and machine learning.
Then to add on top of all that it is a device designed to run with all that tech baked into the phone.
Then is is running stock Android with all of the customization one could make to make their use cases and workflows work better for them.....
We’ve known for some time it wouldn’t be a continuous thing and would end. I’m not defending Google, just don’t see it as that big of a deal.
Surprising Google didn't include an ultra-wide camera to go with their distortion-free computational photography.
https://people.csail.mit.edu/yichangshih/wide_angle_portrait/#paper
But maybe it's better to hold off and get it right rather than including a mediocre one like the iPhone 11 Pro with subpar quality and barrel distortion.
The Pixel 4 is overpriced by $100-$150. Hardware is very outdated looking. Software upgrades are gimmicks.
Nothing flagship about the device.
Then maybe we saw different presentations? Yep...that tech is on a Pixel.....not sure what phone you were talking about but my focus was the Pixel 4....Again, I’m just playing devil’s advocate here for the sake of discussion....😄
Yup, and almost none of them involve my smartphone. I absolutely looks like some serious potential innovation but wasted on a device designed to be used with my hands. As I mentioned in an earlier post, it needs to be in their hands-free products to truly shine.
Maybe but words and a demo in a presentation mean nothing to me. Apple says lots of things claiming it’s the best and then real world usage proves otherwise. I’ll past judgement when third parties actually use it.
. Again, lot of words from a Google executive. I doubt them the least in this area because they’ve already proven their chops but there are things it simply cannot do compared to the competition as well...like take a wide angle shot that just about every other phone can now do. Let’s wait to discuss video later...👇
As I just mentioned in an earlier post...this isn’t limited to the Pixel phones. The Google Assistant is absolutely the best, IMO but it’s not unique to the Pixel.
I prefer Google’s version of Android (really isn’t ‘stock’ anymore) and buy their phones for the software/update experience they provide as well but is it really the advantage it’s historically been? Everywhere I turn online and listen in podcasts, I‘m now consistently hearing/reading that OnePlus really is the new champ in this area, that Oxygen OS is a better user experience with more features/control and better performance. And OP updates barely trail those from Google anymore. And as is preached so often on these fora, customization is an Android hallmark. I don’t need a Pixel to get all of those customization options. In fact, plenty here constantly remind us that the Pixel’s version of Android is far more limited.
Now lets add on the areas where the Pixel is falling short of its competition:
Google simply sucks at video and there is nothing on the spec sheet, nor in that presentation to indicate that’s changed. The Pixel can’t output at 4K/60 fps on any of it’s camera and is limited to 1080P/30 on the front. It also can’t match slo-mo with any of it’s flagship competitors. These are basic, everyday, functional limitations.
It’s falling short in regards to RAM/Storage/battery, all while implementing 90hrz refresh on a display (big props here on adding this feature though). Hell, they put a smaller battery in the 4 vs. the 3, a phone with abysmal battery performance. What good is all of the new tech when your phone is dying even quicker than before. Apple, the ultimate champion of device thinness...even Apple listened to their customers and added a whole bunch of extra battery, made their device thicker, and consequently added hours of extra battery life.
No wifi 6 support. Again, even the lagard Apple added this to the iPhone.
Like I said, Google’s phones, with only rare exceptions, are and have been my Android device of choice. But I can’t honestly claim that their Pixel phones are the most technologically advanced smartphones when they aren’t keeping up with the competition in so many areas. And that includes their cameras.
BTW, just noticed that the Pixel 3/3XL are now options on the trade-in screen. Apologies in advance if I missed someone posting this earlier.
But that video showed correcting the distortion with software. Adding new software after launch is easy, but adding a camera isn't.