Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

JPNFRK7

macrumors 6502a
Sep 27, 2012
599
412
California
While the photo backup news is a bummer for me, its not a deal breaker. Even with the unlimited storage on my Pixel 2. I always kept a copy of the photos and did not allow the phone to delete the pictures after they backed up since I refer to them out in places where I don’t have cell service. Guess Ill just have to manually back them up periodically to retain the full resolution version.
 

nospleen

macrumors 68030
Dec 8, 2002
2,726
1,591
Texas
I don't get unlimited original picture quality storage from Apple on my 11 pro max or from Samsung for my Note 10+

Hey look, we are all here to complain and wait for you to post sample pics, so we can buy ours in a few weeks.

I know I am hoping competition pushes all these companies to step it up a bit. But, it's like they know that I'll buy anyway. Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamezr and 5105973

5105973

Cancelled
Sep 11, 2014
12,132
19,733
I was impressed to see how many assistant functions are going to be carried out on the phone. Siri can be a problem if I don’t have connectivity in some buildings.

All in all I like the concept of this phone. I am dismayed at some of the shortcomings that have been mentioned on this thread. And I’m cautious as always about Google QC. I’m in the “cautiously optimistic waiting for a sale and reviews“ category.

But if it all comes up roses, I think it’s a nice phone. I don’t know though, that it can beat the Samsungs which are all on discounts now or coming up on discounts soon.

If they (Apple) don’t smash the bugs out of iOS soon, though, Jeez they could smack down the iPhones. And I say that as someone who absolutely loves my 11 Pro hardware. But I’m getting deja vu on the bug situation of the iPhone 7 days, I think it was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nospleen

Awesomesince86

macrumors 68020
Sep 18, 2016
2,482
3,302
I don't get unlimited original picture quality storage from Apple on my 11 pro max or from Samsung for my Note 10+
Sure but they offer their own benefits and features. Unlimited picture storage was always one of the features offered by Pixel. They’re removing something, not really adding anything new, and keeping the same price. It’s also annoying because it’s a transparent move. They’re clearly trying to force people into using their Google one storage plans that has so far been a flop.
 

The Game 161

macrumors Nehalem
Dec 15, 2010
30,991
20,172
UK
I don't get unlimited original picture quality storage from Apple on my 11 pro max or from Samsung for my Note 10+

My point is that kind of thing got people in the door to take as many photos as you want to get you into the pixel line. Taking that away while really not adding much and no ultra wise? I don’t many reasons to buy the pixel given that Apple are better or as good or at worse on same level photo wise...

Camera was the big thing that would make people buy a pixel over a iPhone/Samsung etc but now that’s not really the case it’s hard to Justify buying these phones unless you love tech and just need to have stock android

90hz is good no doubt but can’t really say much else was too impressive

Properly why they won’t sell well again.
 

michael9891

Cancelled
Sep 26, 2016
3,060
3,945
Sure but they offer their own benefits and features. Unlimited picture storage was always one of the features offered by Pixel. They’re removing something, not really adding anything new, and keeping the same price. It’s also annoying because it’s a transparent move. They’re clearly trying to force people into using their Google one storage plans that has so far been a flop.
I don’t know. I started using it and £16 for a year of 100gb is pretty decent. Especially as they gave me a home mini which I sold for £21 profit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JaySoul and jamezr

mi7chy

macrumors G4
Oct 24, 2014
10,626
11,298

Chrisblond007

Suspended
Sep 26, 2019
40
53
The Pixel 4 is overpriced by $100-$150. Hardware is very outdated looking. Software upgrades are gimmicks.

Nothing flagship about the device.
 

5105973

Cancelled
Sep 11, 2014
12,132
19,733
Surprising Google didn't include an ultra-wide camera to go with their distortion-free computational photography.

https://people.csail.mit.edu/yichangshih/wide_angle_portrait/#paper

But maybe it's better to hold off and get it right rather than including a mediocre one like the iPhone 11 Pro with subpar quality and barrel distortion.

Thats pretty much the advice I give to anyone who isn’t rabid about ultra wide angle like I am. I’m bonkers for it even with the trade offs. And I admit there are trade offs. But I don’t care because right now the ultra wide is sort of a cool extra on the Note and S10 and the iPhones and LG’s.

The problem is the Pixel doesn’t have this at all to even play with. I can understand why they don’t. Their computational photography looks seriously meticulous.

I do dread seeing how bad video might still be. They didn’t discuss video at all. It’s 2019 and that is too important an area to ignore at this price level.

I liked the stage they used for their presentation. It was very much their aesthetic. But goodness overall this presentation fell down so hard. It started well and Rick Osterloh did a nice job. And then that woman with the monotone got up there and sucked all the energy out. And there’s still so much I don’t know about the Pixel 4 that I will have to look up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: co.ag.2005

tbayrgs

macrumors 604
Jul 5, 2009
7,467
5,097
Again, I’m just playing devil’s advocate here for the sake of discussion....😄

Did you watch the presentation? Did you see the tech involved? Did you see the the Soli implementation? Can you imagine the the use cases?

Yup, and almost none of them involve my smartphone. I absolutely looks like some serious potential innovation but wasted on a device designed to be used with my hands. As I mentioned in an earlier post, it needs to be in their hands-free products to truly shine.

Did you see the new Face Unlock? IMHO it is better than what is on my 11 pro max.

Maybe but words and a demo in a presentation mean nothing to me. Apple says lots of things claiming it’s the best and then real world usage proves otherwise. I’ll past judgement when third parties actually use it.

Did you see the camera section?

Again, lot of words from a Google executive. I doubt them the least in this area because they’ve already proven their chops but there are things it simply cannot do compared to the competition as well...like take a wide angle shot that just about every other phone can now do. Let’s wait to discuss video later...👇

Did you see the Google Assistant portion? That alone should suffice....then best digital assistant on a smartphone. Then throw in the Google AI and machine learning.

As I just mentioned in an earlier post...this isn’t limited to the Pixel phones. The Google Assistant is absolutely the best, IMO but it’s not unique to the Pixel.

Then to add on top of all that it is a device designed to run with all that tech baked into the phone.
Then is is running stock Android with all of the customization one could make to make their use cases and workflows work better for them.....

I prefer Google’s version of Android (really isn’t ‘stock’ anymore) and buy their phones for the software/update experience they provide as well but is it really the advantage it’s historically been? Everywhere I turn online and listen in podcasts, I‘m now consistently hearing/reading that OnePlus really is the new champ in this area, that Oxygen OS is a better user experience with more features/control and better performance. And OP updates barely trail those from Google anymore. And as is preached so often on these fora, customization is an Android hallmark. I don’t need a Pixel to get all of those customization options. In fact, plenty here constantly remind us that the Pixel’s version of Android is far more limited.

Now lets add on the areas where the Pixel is falling short of its competition:

Google simply sucks at video and there is nothing on the spec sheet, nor in that presentation to indicate that’s changed. The Pixel can’t output at 4K/60 fps on any of it’s camera and is limited to 1080P/30 on the front. It also can’t match slo-mo with any of it’s flagship competitors. These are basic, everyday, functional limitations.

It’s falling short in regards to RAM/Storage/battery, all while implementing 90hrz refresh on a display (big props here on adding this feature though). Hell, they put a smaller battery in the 4 vs. the 3, a phone with abysmal battery performance. What good is all of the new tech when your phone is dying even quicker than before. Apple, the ultimate champion of device thinness...even Apple listened to their customers and added a whole bunch of extra battery, made their device thicker, and consequently added hours of extra battery life.

No wifi 6 support. Again, even the lagard Apple added this to the iPhone.

Like I said, Google’s phones, with only rare exceptions, are and have been my Android device of choice. But I can’t honestly claim that their Pixel phones are the most technologically advanced smartphones when they aren’t keeping up with the competition in so many areas. And that includes their cameras.

All that being said, if I was buying a new Android phone today, it would almost certainly be a Pixel 4XL. 😜😜
 
Last edited:

nospleen

macrumors 68030
Dec 8, 2002
2,726
1,591
Texas
We’ve known for some time it wouldn’t be a continuous thing and would end. I’m not defending Google, just don’t see it as that big of a deal.

Agree, but it's little things like the unlimited storage that has offset the hardware concerns that I usually have with the Pixel line.

If they start taking those pieces away, then I'll stop grading on a curve. I'm probably not alone there.
 

TopherMan12

macrumors 6502a
Oct 10, 2019
786
899
Atlanta, GA
Surprising Google didn't include an ultra-wide camera to go with their distortion-free computational photography.

https://people.csail.mit.edu/yichangshih/wide_angle_portrait/#paper

But maybe it's better to hold off and get it right rather than including a mediocre one like the iPhone 11 Pro with subpar quality and barrel distortion.


But that video showed correcting the distortion with software. Adding new software after launch is easy, but adding a camera isn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973

jamezr

macrumors P6
Aug 7, 2011
16,079
19,072
US
Again, I’m just playing devil’s advocate here for the sake of discussion....😄



Yup, and almost none of them involve my smartphone. I absolutely looks like some serious potential innovation but wasted on a device designed to be used with my hands. As I mentioned in an earlier post, it needs to be in their hands-free products to truly shine.



Maybe but words and a demo in a presentation mean nothing to me. Apple says lots of things claiming it’s the best and then real world usage proves otherwise. I’ll past judgement when third parties actually use it.

. Again, lot of words from a Google executive. I doubt them the least in this area because they’ve already proven their chops but there are things it simply cannot do compared to the competition as well...like take a wide angle shot that just about every other phone can now do. Let’s wait to discuss video later...👇



As I just mentioned in an earlier post...this isn’t limited to the Pixel phones. The Google Assistant is absolutely the best, IMO but it’s not unique to the Pixel.



I prefer Google’s version of Android (really isn’t ‘stock’ anymore) and buy their phones for the software/update experience they provide as well but is it really the advantage it’s historically been? Everywhere I turn online and listen in podcasts, I‘m now consistently hearing/reading that OnePlus really is the new champ in this area, that Oxygen OS is a better user experience with more features/control and better performance. And OP updates barely trail those from Google anymore. And as is preached so often on these fora, customization is an Android hallmark. I don’t need a Pixel to get all of those customization options. In fact, plenty here constantly remind us that the Pixel’s version of Android is far more limited.

Now lets add on the areas where the Pixel is falling short of its competition:

Google simply sucks at video and there is nothing on the spec sheet, nor in that presentation to indicate that’s changed. The Pixel can’t output at 4K/60 fps on any of it’s camera and is limited to 1080P/30 on the front. It also can’t match slo-mo with any of it’s flagship competitors. These are basic, everyday, functional limitations.

It’s falling short in regards to RAM/Storage/battery, all while implementing 90hrz refresh on a display (big props here on adding this feature though). Hell, they put a smaller battery in the 4 vs. the 3, a phone with abysmal battery performance. What good is all of the new tech when your phone is dying even quicker than before. Apple, the ultimate champion of device thinness...even Apple listened to their customers and added a whole bunch of extra battery, made their device thicker, and consequently added hours of extra battery life.

No wifi 6 support. Again, even the lagard Apple added this to the iPhone.

Like I said, Google’s phones, with only rare exceptions, are and have been my Android device of choice. But I can’t honestly claim that their Pixel phones are the most technologically advanced smartphones when they aren’t keeping up with the competition in so many areas. And that includes their cameras.
Then maybe we saw different presentations? Yep...that tech is on a Pixel.....not sure what phone you were talking about but my focus was the Pixel 4....
Then in my experiences.......the Google Assistant just works better on a Pixel phone.It doesn't have the impediments of an Android skin....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973 and tbayrgs

tbayrgs

macrumors 604
Jul 5, 2009
7,467
5,097
BTW, just noticed that the Pixel 3/3XL are now options on the trade-in screen. Apologies in advance if I missed someone posting this earlier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nospleen

Awesomesince86

macrumors 68020
Sep 18, 2016
2,482
3,302
Some other confirmations...

UFS 2.1 and not 3.0. No headphones in case. No 4k@60. Only 2x optical zoom. Gorilla glass 5 not 6.

Looks like google hasn’t learned any lessons and continues to cut corners. If I leave my iPhone and go back to android, I really can’t see why I should choose the Pixel over the Note 10 at this point. Fast updates and a slightly better camera just aren’t enough.
 

mi7chy

macrumors G4
Oct 24, 2014
10,626
11,298
But that video showed correcting the distortion with software. Adding new software after launch is easy, but adding a camera isn't.

Software correction for still photos is easier but don't forget video which requires dedicated hardware image processor for real time correction.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.