Maybe those people. I'd rather delete an app once than see an album in my library forever.People would rather get another free U2 album on their iPhones than a GOOG search app.
yup....Seems kind of quaint and short-sighted now. They were going to be THE forms of identity and publishing on the internet. Run by megalomaniacs (and I’m counting pre-Elon.) What could go wrong.
I honestly don’t like Google, but Google Search, Google Maps and Google Mail are the best.
It's noteworthy that back in the heady days of 2007, when Blackberries battled Razrs for dominant breeding position... Google was doing it better than anyone else. It was only ever a default. Remember: There is no spoon.For a company that values privacy, it has always struck me odd that Apple has made Google the default engine.
Well, this discussion apparently happened in 2018, ie around iOS 12, well past the sparse era. Especially considering the relatively tense relationship between Google and Apple over the last few years, I’m surprised Google thought this idea had a snowball’s chance in you-know-where. Clearly it was Google thinking “you know what would be really good for us? Some sort of search interface installed on default on every single iPhone! Now THAT would drive traffic and ad views! Now let’s try to sell Apple on the idea, never mind that it clearly benefits us far more than it does Apple…”And they could have done same with search… I’m sure this was googles aim. Especially at the beginning… when the OS was, let’s say… a little sparse
"Where you gonna go, where you gonna run, where you gonna hide? Nowhere... 'cause there's no one like you left."Yeah, I'd immediately leave Apple if this were the case.
You could argue that YouTube and Google Maps (The original versions before the AppStore), were released by Apple, making them First Party Apps.“While Apple iPhones come with a number of Apple-created apps installed, Apple has never offered a pre-loaded third-party app, which is likely why the company did not accept Pichai's proposal.”
What about YouTube?
Yah, nobody needs a google search app. It's provisioned to expand surveillance capabilities across other apps on the device, that Chrome can't necessarily see into. Chrome, even on 'droid, has settings that can shorten its reach. To say nothing of using a different browser entirely (except I just said it). Android can be a real cesspit if you don't take a diligent interest in security settings in every aspect of the device.I never understood why Android users need a Google app in addition to a browser.
Apple has never offered a pre-loaded third-party app
Just AskJeeves, OK?"Google it" is engraved in our society, don't expect that to change anytime soon.
"Bing it / Duck Duck Go it" said no one ever....
It’s quite possible this author was not into the iPhone when it first launched. Or the author just forgot about YouTube and that classic anthropomorphic app icon“While Apple iPhones come with a number of Apple-created apps installed, Apple has never offered a pre-loaded third-party app, which is likely why the company did not accept Pichai's proposal.”
What about YouTube?
I think Apple learned a painful lesson from Google Maps. Never depend on a competitor for a critical app. Never let a competitor establish a beachhead on your platform.I suspect Apple did not want to give up control of user data.
It's a BIG ask to beg Apple to install the first non-Apple iOS app ever. Like bigger than a lousy $20 billion!Well, Apple's net income was $99.803 billion for fiscal year 2022 and was $94.68 billion for fiscal year 2021.
The $18 billion to $20 billion that Apple gets from Google is pure profit since Apple doesn't have to do anything except make Google the default search engine. The Google payments therefore account for around 20 percent of Apple's overall net income. That's a lot.