I'm against Apple in most of their monopolist ideologies, their actions on right to repair etc., but with iMessage I don't see the problem.
Apple deciding to couple in iMessage into the Messages app is a great UX choice that has us confused it's an advancement to SMS like RCS is, but the truth is that the underlying iMessage platform is much more similar to that of the other, closed and proprietary, apps. RCS is carrier bill dependent and is intended to replace SMS/MMS. Afaik, iMessage has no relation to whether you're paying your phone bill or not as long as you are connected to the internet.
And then, what's in it for Apple if they made iMessage available on other platforms? Having to rework the platform, opening themselves up for more potential spam, higher server load and energy costs from more users? The cherry on top is getting more support calls when something goes wrong to their free of charge phone lines. With those calls they'd already be losing money on, they'd find themselves also having to provide support for countless other devices they don't make or understand, which are running another OS they don't have control over.
I can't imagine them giving that away for free. And since it wouldn't be free, they'll build it for nobody to use - why pay for messaging?
I'd love for Apple to just be good and grateful for their position, doing generous stuff like this from time to time, but doing this would be a long-term commitment to supporting non-paying customers and that's a bad business decision.
If they decide to build RCS in, great, but carriers could decide to charge for it just like with SMS (I'm pretty sure they want to in the EU, we never had the "free unlimited SMS" thing).
Apple deciding to couple in iMessage into the Messages app is a great UX choice that has us confused it's an advancement to SMS like RCS is, but the truth is that the underlying iMessage platform is much more similar to that of the other, closed and proprietary, apps. RCS is carrier bill dependent and is intended to replace SMS/MMS. Afaik, iMessage has no relation to whether you're paying your phone bill or not as long as you are connected to the internet.
And then, what's in it for Apple if they made iMessage available on other platforms? Having to rework the platform, opening themselves up for more potential spam, higher server load and energy costs from more users? The cherry on top is getting more support calls when something goes wrong to their free of charge phone lines. With those calls they'd already be losing money on, they'd find themselves also having to provide support for countless other devices they don't make or understand, which are running another OS they don't have control over.
I can't imagine them giving that away for free. And since it wouldn't be free, they'll build it for nobody to use - why pay for messaging?
I'd love for Apple to just be good and grateful for their position, doing generous stuff like this from time to time, but doing this would be a long-term commitment to supporting non-paying customers and that's a bad business decision.
If they decide to build RCS in, great, but carriers could decide to charge for it just like with SMS (I'm pretty sure they want to in the EU, we never had the "free unlimited SMS" thing).