Congratulations! I'm glad you finally got it.
Will you do that? I haven't yet seen a report of anyone doing the test to demonstrate that it will run at 4.5 GHz. Also, if you have a little spare time would you perhaps run this little test? Thanks.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/encoding-with-handbrake-2017-imac.2089925/page-2#post-25686799
So I have a program that computes increasing prime numbers until it's terminated. When it executes it runs a single core at a steady 100% CPU use.
Here's what I did running this Prime Number program and varying the enabled cores with Hyper Threading disabled.
My iMac Pro is a 10-core/128GB RAM/1TB SSD/Vega 64 running macOS X 10.13.2 Build 17C2205.
The only Apps running were Intel Power Gadget, Terminal, the Prime Number program, Xcode Instruments (to enable/disable cores) and Activity Monitor.
1) I ran the test with one instance of the prime number program executing
Frequency was observed using the Intel Power Gadget
1 cores active - Frequency = 4.5 GHz
2 cores active - Frequency = 4.5 GHz
3 cores active - Frequency = 4.3 GHz
4 cores active - Frequency = 4.2 GHz
5 cores active - Frequency = 4.2 GHz
6 cores active - Frequency = 4.2 GHz
7 cores active - Frequency = 4.2 GHz
8 cores active - Frequency = 4.2 GHz
9 cores active - Frequency = 4.2 GHz
10 cores active - Frequency = 4.2 GHz
2) I ran the test again with two instances of the prime number program executing
1 cores active - Frequency = 4.5 GHz
2 cores active - Frequency = 4.5 GHz
3 cores active - Frequency = 4.3 GHz
4 cores active - Frequency = 4.2 GHz
5 cores active - Frequency = 4.2 GHz
6 cores active - Frequency = 4.2 GHz
7 cores active - Frequency = 4.2 GHz
8 cores active - Frequency = 4.2 GHz
9 cores active - Frequency = 4.2 GHz
10 cores active - Frequency = 4.2 GHz
3) I ran the test again with 10 instances of the Prime Number program running with 10 cores enabled and Hyper threading disabled.
Frequency was a steady 3.8 GHz
I ran the test again with 10 instances of the Prime Number program running with 10 cores enabled and with Hyper threading enabled.
Frequency was a steady 4.1 GHz
I ran the test again with 20 instances of the Prime Number program running with 20 logical cores enabled and Hyper threading disabled.
Frequency was a steady 3.8 GHz
I ran the test again with 20 instances of the Prime Number program running with 20 logical cores enabled and with Hyper threading enabled.
Frequency was varied from 3.49 to 3.64 GHz
During the most aggressive testing the Temperature never exceeded 93ºC and fans did not spin up to be noticeable to me.
[doublepost=1516172786][/doublepost]
Congratulations! I'm glad you finally got it.
Will you do that? I haven't yet seen a report of anyone doing the test to demonstrate that it will run at 4.5 GHz. Also, if you have a little spare time would you perhaps run this little test? Thanks.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/encoding-with-handbrake-2017-imac.2089925/page-2#post-25686799
So I ran the HandBrake test as you requested and this was the result
encoded 7110 frames in 319.34s (22.26 fps), 8466.47 kb/s, Avg QP:26.42
While HandBrake was running temperature was moving between 91ºC and 92ºC and Intel Power Gadget was reporting frequency between 3.3 GHz and 3.61 GHz. Just about all 10 cores and 10 logical cores were close to being pegged close to 100% most of the time.
Last edited: