What, someone has to take responsibility someday?
No, but he will "get to the bottom of it."

"I will let the DOJ investigate the DOJ scandal claim, it's only fair."
What, someone has to take responsibility someday?
As for your first statement – they are already locking people up in Guantanamo without any due process. Some of the prisoners there are likely innocent – maybe they expressed thoughts that made the government "suspicious" about them, but haven't committed any real crimes. Yet they will have no chance at accessing normal legal means of resistance. Because terrorism.
Reading this thread is making me wonder.
Is it possible that we could see a slow realignment of political parties within the next twenty years? Support and objection to this surveillance doesn't seem to have much to do with political parties. Interesting...
It's very different from the censorship and mind control of 1984.
Prisoners at Guantanamo Bay are protected by the US Constitution at this point. And just like a normal prison, suspects can be held before actually proven guilty.
----------
Either you're an Obamabot, or they figure out how they brain works to make you an Obamabot.
Please, could we have an open and respectful bipartisan discussion without resorting to such this type of unnecessary rhetoric? It serves no purpose other than to inflame others.
Please, could we have an open and respectful discussion without resorting to unnecessary rhetoric? It serves no purpose other than to inflame others.
How does this affect those of us outside the US?
Can even the most (blind) and denying loyal Obama followers admit: Obama dun goofed.
Between this and Verizon, AP tapping, Benghazi coverups (don't bother overexaggerating it, it was a 9/11 off shore, even on 9/11, but anyways...) that has whistleblowers jobs threatened from coming forward, awesome sauce, NDAA to allow indefinite detention of prisoners WITHOUT due process signed on New Year's Eve when Obama promised to veto it, the politically discrimating IRS, whose head visited WH 157 times (of course Obama knew about it, you thought he learned about it when mainstream media reported it? He is president, come on, he was/is in on it), electing Rice as a national security adviser, THIS IS INSANE.
something needs to be done immediately. I don't think the American people can be afford to be passive anymore.
He is not a democrat. he is something straight out of 1984.
Can even the most (blind) and denying loyal Obama followers admit: Obama dun goofed.
Between this and Verizon, AP tapping, Benghazi coverups (don't bother overexaggerating it, it was a 9/11 off shore, even on 9/11, but anyways...) that has whistleblowers jobs threatened from coming forward, awesome sauce, NDAA to allow indefinite detention of prisoners WITHOUT due process signed on New Year's Eve when Obama promised to veto it, the politically discrimating IRS, whose head visited WH 157 times (of course Obama knew about it, you thought he learned about it when mainstream media reported it? He is president, come on, he was/is in on it), electing Rice as a national security adviser, THIS IS INSANE.
something needs to be done immediately. I don't think the American people can be afford to be passive anymore.
He is not a democrat. he is something straight out of 1984.
btw this Obamacare (which I assure you is no AppleCare even on its worst day) is going to be run by the IRS.
Our national health coverage. Run. by. IRS. The neutral and loving. I.R.S.
yeaaaah..... Good luck getting sick.
The program began under Bush. Good luck with learning how to think critically.
http://whitehouse.gov/photos-and-vi...president-obama-speaks-brain-initiative-and-…
are you sure?
Either you're an Obamabot, or they figure out how they brain works to make you an Obamabot.
Big brother is always watching
Big brother has all your files on your hard drive copied. Hook your computer up to the internet, your drive gets copied.
Please, could we have an open and respectful discussion without resorting to unnecessary rhetoric? It serves no purpose other than to inflame others.
404 error. Don't assume that I'm an Obama supporter. I don't like his party or some of the things he is doing, and I'm open to a Republican president in general, but I just didn't like Romney.
Through the firewall?
Besides, Big Brother can't afford to do that.
You didn't like Romney? Why? Too rich? Too Mormon? Too financially smart? Too good looking? Too big a family? Too 47% ? What?
Through the firewall?
How come Big Brother didn't wake my Mac up for network access?
While I'm certainly not in favor of tin-foiling, I think its naive to assume that your firewall wholly protects you if someone wants contents of your HDD.
Keep in mind what your firewall does -- block ports, IP addys, and maybe some MAC addresses. It doesn't stop all data leaving your computer through port 80 and 443, unless you're not using the Internet at all. All it takes is some basic social engineering (or more complicated programs) to compromise your system, let alone 0day exploits. Speaking of which, we know governments have many if the Stuxnet worm was any indication.
Now, that's not say that the government would do that for everyone, but they can still easily access any online information stored on third party servers, as discussed in this article.
Have you ever been asked to update your Adobe Reader when you've already updated it 3 days ago? Have you ever been asked to update your flash player when you know for sure it's already up to date? Have you ever downloaded an application and have been asked to provide your admin password? Have you ever had any Apple software updates? I got news for you brother, everything on your computer has been uploaded to a government server.
You didn't like Romney? Why? Too rich? Too Mormon? Too financially smart? Too good looking? Too big a family? Too 47% ? What?
They'd have to wake my computer up to take any data from it, and I'd see the connection in the log.