Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.
Interesting theory from Tech Journalist Charles Arthur (
@charlesarthur) who speculates on the reason why Apple abruptly ended the iOS 13 Beta and changed to 13.1

We all know the iOS 13.x Betas have been and remain far from the finished article.

This journalist suggests the reason Apple stopped testing of iOS 13 whilst in such a poor state was due to new iPhone production timescales.

He believes, with the confusion emanating from the White House regarding tariffs, that Apple have taken the decision to manufacture far more new models than planned in order to stockpile these Stateside and potentially avoid tariffs on the units.

Apple are gambling that even though they know the iOS 13 installed on these new devices is nowhere near the standard expected, that they will be able to quickly follow it up with a more polished 13.1 release.

As I say, an interesting theory and very plausible in the current political climate.

Lol

Charles and I compared notes over Twitter (really) on Thursday after his Medium post. He has definitely fleshed out the idea I posted about an hour after launch. Quite plausible.
 
47B005C9-CE86-460B-9C4F-16D17C190023.jpeg
How is your battery? Could it be the battery not able to hold the iPhone up if you force the max performance?

No problems here on XS Max

The battery is ok, it’s an iPhone XS space gray 64GB 6 months old
 
With the release of iOS 13
Coming very soon... Are all apps going to be ready? I haven't installed the beta yet because most all of the apps ive used don't seem to be iOS 13 ready (or hasn't no mention yet). I'm hoping on launch day they are...
 
If my theory about 13.0/13.1 is correct (short version: 13.1 is the REAL 13.0 due to need to ship iPhones early*), perhaps a more useful way to view what has happened is to think of 13.1 as 13.0+.

Unlike a traditional x.1 , which is released (even as a beta) after the x.0 version is released and usually contains as many bug fixes or more than new features, 13.1 seem more like a “continuation” of 13.0. Hence, my thinking that it really is the version that will be released

Consider:

-13.1 beta 1 was released before release of final 13.0. Unprecedented.
-Apple issued no cautionary “don’t download this beta if you want to be able to restore a backup to the release version of 13.0 on iPhone 11 launch” - type warning. They could easily have explained themselves, and told anyone who is not using a dedicated development device not to install 13.1.
-There is no (current) feasible way to get 13.1 beta testers (which are now both developers and the public) back onto a track that will make “switching tracks” to a putative 13.0 GM (not impossible, but practically so without playing with build numbers or creating some sort of new profile).
-To all appearances, 13.1 doesn’t do anything that would indicate a break with 13.0, but rather just further development and refinement of 13.0 (adding back in previously disabled features, primarily). It is the latter (the re-added features) that require the x.1 (vs x.0.1) designation, as some have argued.
-If this is the case, you can throw out the normal beta development cycle as an analog. In fact, the quick release of a public beta argues for this point.

Using the principle of “the simplest solution is most frequently the correct solution”, the most likely interpretation is that Apple intends to release 13.1 to the public on existing devices and will offer it as a launch day upgrade to the new iPhones. If we get a 2nd DB/PB this week, that would largely confirm this theory.

*The need to “fork” the development of iOS 13 is probably necessitated by a need to produce and ship phones early due to tariff considerations. Those phones have to have iOS 13 installed when they leave China. iOS 13.0 is that version. But the state iOS 13 it was in when these phones needed to have it installed was not the state Apple wanted to have ready for iPhone launch.

What to do?

Install the best available portions of iOS 13 on the shipped phones and continue development from that point under the aegis of iOS 13.1. That would then be ready to install ecosystem wide on iPhone launch day.

Problem solved!

It would be very interesting to go back and review Trump’s China tweets in the week or 2 preceding the removal of Shortcuts Automation features and Answer with AirPods and see if there were any telltale ones that might have panicked Apple into this move.
 
Safari is so laggy after some time, so i have to restart my iPad Pro. Beta is a total mess.
 
Lol

Charles and I compared notes over Twitter (really) on Thursday after his Medium post. He has definitely fleshed out the idea I posted about an hour after launch. Quite plausible.

There was no credit to you in the article I read I’m afraid.

It was in praise of him and his theory.
 
If my theory about 13.0/13.1 is correct (short version: 13.1 is the REAL 13.0 due to need to ship iPhones early*), perhaps a more useful way to view what has happened is to think of 13.1 as 13.0+.

Unlike a traditional x.1 , which is released (even as a beta) after the x.0 version is released and usually contains as many bug fixes or more than new features, 13.1 seem more like a “continuation” of 13.0. Hence, my thinking that it really is the version that will be released

Consider:

-13.1 beta 1 was released before release of final 13.0. Unprecedented.
-Apple issued no cautionary “don’t download this beta if you want to be able to restore a backup to the release version of 13.0 on iPhone 11 launch” - type warning. They could easily have explained themselves, and told anyone who is not using a dedicated development device not to install 13.1.
-There is no (current) feasible way to get 13.1 beta testers (which are now both developers and the public) back onto a track that will make “switching tracks” to a putative 13.0 GM (not impossible, but practically so without playing with build numbers or creating some sort of new profile).
-To all appearances, 13.1 doesn’t do anything that would indicate a break with 13.0, but rather just further development and refinement of 13.0 (adding back in previously disabled features, primarily). It is the latter (the re-added features) that require the x.1 (vs x.0.1) designation, as some have argued.
-If this is the case, you can throw out the normal beta development cycle as an analog. In fact, the quick release of a public beta argues for this point.

Using the principle of “the simplest solution is most frequently the correct solution”, the most likely interpretation is that Apple intends to release 13.1 to the public on existing devices and will offer it as a launch day upgrade to the new iPhones. If we get a 2nd DB/PB this week, that would largely confirm this theory.

*The need to “fork” the development of iOS 13 is probably necessitated by a need to produce and ship phones early due to tariff considerations. Those phones have to have iOS 13 installed when they leave China. iOS 13.0 is that version. But the state iOS 13 it was in when these phones needed to have it installed was not the state Apple wanted to have ready for iPhone launch.

What to do?

Install the best available portions of iOS 13 on the shipped phones and continue development from that point under the aegis of iOS 13.1. That would then be ready to install ecosystem wide on iPhone launch day.

Problem solved!

It would be very interesting to go back and review Trump’s China tweets in the week or 2 preceding the removal of Shortcuts Automation features and Answer with AirPods and see if there were any telltale ones that might have panicked Apple into this move.

Let's stipulate that Apple has to accelerate production and shipment of iPhones because of uncertainty regarding tariffs and that these devices all require iOS 13. They would ship with a GM equivalent to a late beta, warts and all.

Why would Apple not just continue development of iOS 13.0 to address bugs and offer a 13.0.x update quickly, rather than releasing 13.1? I haven't installed 13.1 beta 1, but it wouldn't surprise me if the added features introduced yet more bugs. Wouldn't it be safer to just to stay with the usual sequence?
 
  • Like
Reactions: one more
Let's stipulate that Apple has to accelerate production and shipment of iPhones because of uncertainty regarding tariffs and that these devices all require iOS 13. They would ship with a GM equivalent to a late beta, warts and all.

Why would Apple not just continue development of iOS 13.0 to address bugs and offer a 13.0.x update quickly, rather than releasing 13.1? I haven't installed 13.1 beta 1, but it wouldn't surprise me if the added features introduced yet more bugs. Wouldn't it be safer to just to stay with the usual sequence?

As someone (and I apologize for not recalling but it might have been @TimFL1) said over in the Speculation thread, the sheer change in features would require the point, rather than minor, update nomenclature.
 
In the weather widget. On my iPad, only Cupertino's weather would show, and there was no way to change it. There is a button on the bottom of the widget that says "Set Default Location" or something to that effect. It never worked until this beta.
Must be a pro only option. Not seeing that in iPad mini 4.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bydandie
I don't think I see it mentioned in any of the previous 23 pages but this beta has super sensitive touch. My Xs Max does not even care for 3D touch, if my finger sits on any link or icon for half a second, it's considering it long press. Please tell me there are others out there.

It does but I am finding that to also be inconsistent.
[doublepost=1567388132][/doublepost]
Same here and it's worst I've ever seen.


After a full day, Lin the eve I’m down in the pow 20’s instead of 60’s like normal.
 
This is something that has occurred for myself and my friend since the first betas.

When tapping on a link (for example from a text message), links open in Safari instead of the proper app (Twitter, Reddit, Facebook, etc). I searched and Apple suggests nuking the phone (no thanks), and that was the only response.

Is this happening for anyone else and if so, how’d you fix it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: macintoshmac
This is something that has occurred for myself and my friend since the first betas.

When tapping on a link (for example from a text message), links open in Safari instead of the proper app (Twitter, Reddit, Facebook, etc). I searched and Apple suggests nuking the phone (no thanks), and that was the only response.

Is this happening for anyone else and if so, how’d you fix it?

For me, this seems somewhat random. I think this is just the beta thing. There was a beta when no link opened the app, it was always Safari. Now, almost always it is the proper app if installed. Rarely does it go to Safari. So I preliminarily conclude this is just random beta thing. Nothing to worry I fancy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: H3LL5P4WN
I am not sure what the name of the feature was but in the previous versions if I selected a photo for example to share I was able to see the latest or most used contacts to simply click on to text the photo to. It was basically the first line of the sharing options. Was this taken off in 13.1?
 
I am not sure what the name of the feature was but in the previous versions if I selected a photo for example to share I was able to see the latest or most used contacts to simply click on to text the photo to. It was basically the first line of the sharing options. Was this taken off in 13.1?

It's broken. If you tried to randomly tap that area, you'll notice the selected preview image shakes. You just have to do it the long way by tapping Messages and type in the contact name.
 
Why would Apple not just continue development of iOS 13.0 to address bugs and offer a 13.0.x update quickly, rather than releasing 13.1? I haven't installed 13.1 beta 1, but it wouldn't surprise me if the added features introduced yet more bugs. Wouldn't it be safer to just to stay with the usual sequence?

My thoughts exactly! Say Apple shipped the phones early with “half-baked” iOS 13 (DB6-8) or whatever. It would make more sense (to me) if they just continued improving iOS 13.0 betas, released iOS 13.0 GM on 10 Sep and then everyone getting a new iPhone in late September could just update it straight away to the latest iOS 13.0 variant (which would have been very stable by then). So why create this software confusion late in iOS 13.0 beta cycle?
 
I was on 13.1 and then I went back to iOS 12.4. Am I going crazy or the brightness is stronger on iOS 13? I always have it on 50% untill I need more, depending where I am, inside or outside, and I swear when I had 13, brigtness 50% its brighter than iOS 12.4 50%
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.