Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Here are some more 7 Plus pictures. No editing whatsoever.
IMG_5293.jpg


IMG_5306 2.jpg
 
Last edited:
A rule of thumb when shooting iPhone 7 plus pics is:

There are only two optical focal lengths available. Wide angle (28mm equivalent) and standard (56mm equivalent).

All zooming effects except those two native focal length are just over sampling. Aka digital zoom. All over sampling does is add interpolated pixels to make the file size larger. It doesn't improve detail or sharpness at all. It only bloats the file size unnecessarily.

It is better to take a photo at 1x or 2x and crop the photo afterwards to the view you want than zoom in the camera.

The bigger f1.8 aperture of the new lens in the iPhone 7 will only be of use in very low light conditions. It allows a next higher shutter speed or next higher iso to improve graininess or camera shake. The camera will never shoot at f1.8 in normally lit scenes.
 
Here is a photo of a water tower using ProCamera 8 I selected raw on this and processed it as a raw file. Photos are so much sharper and cleaner looking one photograph with raw. This was done with the 2X telephoto by the way. Since there is an issue with me uploading photos to this thread or to this forum, I keep getting yours stating that the system cannot handle the file.

https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-7dxv49L/0/X3/i-7dxv49L-X3.jpg

Here is a Nother processed raw file using Adobe Photoshop light room for the iPhone app

https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-DpNCX9T/0/X3/i-DpNCX9T-X3.jpg

Here is full resolution

https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-DpNCX9T/0/O/i-DpNCX9T.jpg

My Aunt Cheryl and Uncle Terry live in Luling. Small world!!
 
Shot these images in DNG and processed in Lightroom- one in very low light, and the other on a sunny day. I realized that the sensor has a lot of baseline noise (mostly chroma noise). Images look great when there's ample light, but takes quite a hit in low-light conditions. After playing around with the DNG files, I must admit Apple did a great job in their ISP processing for low-light photography. I am struggling to make my low-light DNG files look better than those shot straight from the native camera app. Basically this- daytime DNG photos are great and easily beat the JPGEs from native camera app, but for low-light photography, you're better off with Apple's JPEGs as they tend to look better IMO. Also, I noticed the native camera app tends to blow out highlights? Not that it matters too much if you shot in DNG though.
[doublepost=1474390746][/doublepost]Here's an example of the amount of detail I managed to pull out of a DNG file. It was practically pitch black with the only light source coming from the neon lights. Pretty impressed
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7978.jpg
    IMG_7978.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 471
  • IMG_7997.jpg
    IMG_7997.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 434
  • IMG_7935.jpg
    IMG_7935.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 444
  • IMG_7944.JPG
    IMG_7944.JPG
    1.8 MB · Views: 446
Last edited:
Where's the option for TiFD format? I only see JPEG or PNG. Or are you using a different app to export?

Sorry it's PNG. It produces larger file sizes but has less compression which can lead to detail loss.
[doublepost=1474394127][/doublepost]
i would buy pro camera!

Pro camera seems similar to camera plus in that it gives you a lot of manual controls. On the other hand, cortex is a very simple app that has very options, but it has a very good algorithm for combining many pictures into one more detailed and less noisy one.
[doublepost=1474394772][/doublepost]
Camera+ and Cortex are both $3.99.

If you had to choose only one to buy, which one would it be and why?

They are different. Camera+ has been around for a long time with constant updates. It has a ton of manual control. I use it to create long exposure shots in the dark. T is listed as one of Apple's "essential" apps and with 10 million sold it has encouraged the developers to produce regular updates.

Cortex has one specific purpose with very little manual control (currently). It lets you take 30 or so pictures and then intelligently combines them into one high quality picture. Of course, this requires your subject to stay perfectly still for two seconds. I did manage to get my girlfriend to stand still, but kids and pets would not be doable.
 
Last edited:
I have never heard of it, thanks! I mainly use vsco cam and lightroom, but I will download it.

It's truly the best image editing app right now on iPhone. I used to use VSCO all the time and purchased all the filters but their UI is terrible after this year update.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.