You got one thing wrong. I never said or pretended I am neutral nor do I want to be when the outcome doesn't coincide with the result of my evaluation or shown evidences.
But I will not to bury my head in the sand and not retort when someone brings out supposedly facts which are opposite of what available (tangible) evidences showed. e.g ... android lags...Touchwiz is crap. ..Apple ecosystem is best...ios ui is the easiest etc.
Let's look at this another way. What impression does the name Apple gives? Which company has a more cult following apple or Samsung? Don't say Samsung because that would be far from it.
Take away the cult following or brand name impression, how many iphone buyers would have dropped off given that you have to pay a premium price but with a spec sheet that is inferior to others.
I know most apple defenders will come and say..you pay for iPhone experience and ecosystem which are invaluable so people are willing to pay more. These reasons themselves are inspired by cult following and Apple marketing.
If I don't own a mac or iPads or apple tv or use itunes then the so-called apple ecosystem is actually a disadvantge to me. If I am more technically inclined the ios walled garden is regression to me. But if people belonging to these 2 categories still buy iPhone in spite of the disadvantages, what does that tell you?
It tells me that your "disadvantages" are not seen as such by others. And that some like me, see the walled garden as an advantage.
That you used the word cult could describe most of the people on this forum.
2 iPads, 4 iPhones and Apple TV.