Yes because it was released almost 20 years ago.And the original iPhone had a potato for a camera, very little storage and ram and a slow processor, no wireless charging, satalite conectivity, etc.
Yes because it was released almost 20 years ago.And the original iPhone had a potato for a camera, very little storage and ram and a slow processor, no wireless charging, satalite conectivity, etc.
Some pre-paid companies are already offering discounts on it, up to $300 with plan activation.idk if you look at how absurdly expensive tech products have gotten, the iphone 16e being €699 isn't outrageous, I guess. You won't get any discounts on it though, you get what you get.
I always liked the subsidized phone cost as well. Didn't mind signing a 2 year contract with Verizon or TMobile for it. Unless you buy the phone outright from Apple you are still basically signing a 2 year contract and paying more for the phone. They used the argument that plan prices would be lowered but they have consistently increased during that same timePeople used to absolutely freak out about service contracts and I honestly never understood it. All the carriers suck equally. The idea of constantly switching carriers is idiotic. The idea of needing a way out is idiotic. I don't care who my carrier is, nor do I want to spend any amount of time or thought on them. If a 3 year "contract" for something I know I am absolutely going to use for 3 years and beyond gets me the same thing for cheaper, that is a no brainer. Somehow we got here, where we now have to pay through the nose for the device, and can now stop using it at any time after paying through the nose. Wow. What a victory.
You may have taken it as condescending, but it wasn’t meant to be that way. It’s just fact that if you’re making a very small amount of money, it’s very difficult to afford an expensive device like an iPhone. There are people in countries that make less than $100 a month so they have a difficult time affording things like an iPhone. They have to go for an android phone and there’s nothing wrong with that. Maybe some save their money for a long period of time but I feel like spending even three months salary on a phone seems difficultThis is very condescending attitude. Even thinking that people who buy android are people those who cannot afford Apple products is wrong. The maximum share apple iphone has in any country is 60%. Max share of Mac is about 30% in any country. We should respect the choices of the people.
People with $100 monthly income use their phone more. They don't have several devices for internet access and their phone is a tablet, PC, phone for call/sms and a TV. They expect a lot from their from and a $150 phone meets their expectations. It is an engineering marvel that companies have developed a device to serve them.
iMessage, AirDrop, iCloud backup and Apple Pay are the main ones that come to mind for me.Which features?
Samsung didn’t. That might dictate things somewhat.These scenarios are all plausible. I think the should have priced the 16e at $499 and reduced the 15 to $649. Especially if the 15 isn’t sticking around after the 17 is announced (because Apple wants all their phones to support Apple Intelligence) then reducing it $50 makes sense. But if Apple is planning to hike everything $100 then I get why they priced it at $599. If they do raise prices on the entire line that will suck.
Why would you tell someone, that’s only stating their own preference, that they’re wrong? You know their mind, needs, wants, and value system better than they do? 🤔haha... no.
Exactly. 👍🏽
does it have a 120hz display to be compared withWhen compared to the Pixel and OnePlus, the 16E Price to performance is a steal.
compare peoples pay priced in with inflation there's no raise so how is it better$599 now would be equivalent to $383.64 in 2007, so it’s cheaper than the original iPhone when factoring in inflation.
compare peoples pay priced in with inflation there's no raise so how is it better
And this was me thinking “e” in 16e stood for economy 🤣Apple doesn't use the phrase "budget phone" anywhere, and never claimed it was.
It's not a budget phone. It's a lower-cost model.
The 2025 equivalent of $499 dollars in 2007 is about $635 dollars today, so the 16E at $599 dollars is actually a savings of about $35 bucks to you. Taking inflation into account, you can look at it this way; Apple has refined its product and improved its technology and they still were able to drop their price to consumers by about 5.7%I think iPhone 16E is every bit worth $599 at today's market value, but that's NOT a budget phone in our current day economy. A 16E mini at $499 is needed.
1. technology gets ever cheaper. We don't pay the same amount of our income towards PCs and cellphones compared to the 90ies and 2000s.1. With inflation, it was more expensive, relatively
2. Smartphones have become far more advanced
3. Smartphones have become more essential to people’s daily lives, and therefore more worthy of taking up a larger share of their budget
2. they regressed. Features were removed to make them cheaper and easier to produce. We don't get physical keyboards, deglared screens, stylus and replaceable batteries anymore for example. Even size has increased to allow for cheaper production.
Same for me. And the SSH client on my iphone 13 doesn't run any more ergonomical, despite the "mini" being larger than the Q10. In 2005, my Nokia 9500 also had a pretty decent ssh terminal.In 2007, I was thrilled to have a somewhat usable SSH terminal on my BlackBerry.