But I also know that Apple may disappoint me too...![]()
They will. The mini 2012 will not exist. The next comes in 2013.
But I also know that Apple may disappoint me too...![]()
Do you guys think we might see an update to the Mac Mini as a "side note" September 12th?
*Crossing fingers*
I think Apple's September back to school promotion ends on the 21st, I'm hoping well see new iMac's and Mini's shortly after that.
I had the same thought. The promo could really just be a liquidation in disguise. Sell off as much old stock as possible, then refresh. I hope this is the case. I can wait until November to buy a new computer but no longer. And I'd much rather it be sooner with school coming.
Keeping my fingers crossed for a mini refresh in the next month/6 weeks!
I'm hoping it's a liquidation scheme.
If i were you i'd rather worry about the havoc those things wreak on your health...I can't get good wifi due to my proximity to US Air Force bases and Navy Air Force Bases. When ever these are up in the air my wifi dies.
[...]
these types of radar planes and blimps are tested near my home a lot. they wreak havoc with wifi.
The idea of the (currently) most valueable company on this planet - while already focusing on a very little number of products - would not be able to maintain a proper development of their still tiny portfolio without significant delays on a couple of their other product lines makes me shiver to the bone!resources were pulled from Mini development to expand the laptop line up. The mini will catch up later.
If i were you i'd rather worry about the havoc those things wreak on your health...
...
Do you guys think we might see an update to the Mac Mini as a "side note" September 12th?
*Crossing fingers*
The idea of the (currently) most valueable company on this planet - while already focusing on a very little number of products - would not be able to maintain a proper development of their still tiny portfolio without significant delays on a couple of their other product lines makes me shiver to the bone!
When the delays only affected the MacPro, people tried to argue it away with low sales numbers, missing hardware options and other crap.
When the delays reached the mini, people tried to argue it away with the low margins the mini would bring Apple (and similar stuff).
Now that the delays also affect their biggest selling (desktop) product - the iMac - to me it seems obvious that something is going severely wrong inside Apple!
...
Neither the Mac Pro nor the mini are strategic to the Mac . Tactical submarket silos to fill yes. Strategic no. And yes that has to do with major lack of contribution to the core growth rate.
...
I wonder how long that will be true.
If they drop all but iMac I wonder if that would kill the goose.
I would hate to give up on Apple if the mini was dropped. I don't think it will, though I really like it. I feel like I'm just getting used to Mac OS X.
I just had some skin cancer removed. Most likely not the blimps fault but you never know.
The premise here is flawed in that this would be a unilateral move. If the weaker models are retired as demand falls the goose is already gone versus dead. If they are cancelled but the overall Mac is still healthy that means that an even heavier percentage of Mac uses switched over to laptops.
If Mini and Mac Pro fall away the iMac could expand to fill part of those silos. A "pro" thicker model similar to the HP Z1 and a $899-999 price point iMac to fill part of the mini space.
However, it is far more likely that as the 'classic' personal computer market matures the pacing and freuquency of updates will slow down as the remaining number of major players continue to shrink. As long as Apple can increasingly find enough folks to buy into the value proposition that the Min and Mac Pro (and iMac ) offer they'll continue to sell them. But if their growth rate stablizes around 0.5-4% and the other Mac remain at 4-10% then they aren't strategic.
To me a strategic value is not (solely) derived from growth rates or percentage of total turnover or EBIT. Actually the strategic value could even be disproportional to the latter mentioned numbers.But if their growth rate stablizes around 0.5-4% and the other Mac remain at 4-10% then they aren't strategic.
The premise here is flawed in that this would be a unilateral move. If the weaker models are retired as demand falls the goose is already gone versus dead. If they are cancelled but the overall Mac is still healthy that means that an even heavier percentage of Mac uses switched over to laptops.
If Mini and Mac Pro fall away the iMac could expand to fill part of those silos. A "pro" thicker model similar to the HP Z1 and a $899-999 price point iMac to fill part of the mini space.
However, it is far more likely that as the 'classic' personal computer market matures the pacing and freuquency of updates will slow down as the remaining number of major players continue to shrink. As long as Apple can increasingly find enough folks to buy into the value proposition that the Min and Mac Pro (and iMac ) offer they'll continue to sell them. But if their growth rate stablizes around 0.5-4% and the other Mac remain at 4-10% then they aren't strategic.
To me a strategic value is not (solely) derived from growth rates or percentage of total turnover or EBIT. Actually the strategic value could even be disproportional to the latter mentioned numbers...