And you know this how?
When has his name appeared in the news for doing charitable things?
And you know this how?
Perhaps he prefers to do his charitable work anonymously. Rather than making a public display of "Look at me, see, I do good things!" Just surmising...When has his name appeared in the news for doing charitable things?
I answered #3 that he is beginning to lose credibility. When I first saw him I really thought he was great. These days I think he says more and more things he knows are dishonest. Please submit your opinion. Maybe there should be more poll options as well.
When has his name appeared in the news for doing charitable things?
The guy that pumps out in Steve's opinion "third rate products" is also the worlds largest philanthropist.
Also Apple was told to pull an ad in the UK for reasons that it was dishonest I know it isn't Jobs that makes them but shows a pattern.
SJ was nice when he was working with The Woz back when Apple was new, but when it started to get big SJ got nasty
I watched the documentary on it, Pirates Of Silicon Valley.
This last "event" may be the last straw. Apple said it was going to be "big" and it was anything but big. Just some minor incremental changes to the iPod line up. They should have simply updated the web site. Now no one will believe it when they say "big". What does a reporter who flew in from the east coast think when he hears "So now the Nano is tall again and some prices have changed." He thinks "I'll never fall for that again."
But Steve dishonest? No I don't think so. Just not so smart to cal a big event to announce trivia.
I might argue that those who do get their name in the news are doing the charitable things for reasons other than charity.
The second answer is, Yes, I'm beginning to dislike him, while the fourth is, I have began to hate him. What's the difference? The amount of bile involved?
And how about those who have always disliked/hated him?
What a poll...
What makes Bill Gates a philanthropist in your opinion? Microsoft has made him more money than he can spend on himself, so he is desperately trying to buy himself a good reputation. And who pays for it? Not Bill Gates, but customers buying Microsoft products.
Now if someone replaces "misleading" with "dishonest", as you just did, is that just misleading or is it dishonest? But let's compare: Apple is told to withdraw one TV advert in the UK. Microsoft is fined a bit more than 600 million Euros for violating a court order for more than three years.
Maybe because Steve Jobs is busy giving the locals clean drinking water and sanitation whilst Bill is more concerned with ensuring future customers?Ummm okay but I have never seen a computer lab donated by Apple in any 3rd world country. I have seen windows boxes.
Maybe because Steve Jobs is busy giving the locals clean drinking water and sanitation whilst Bill is more concerned with ensuring future customers?
It's a possibility.
In fairness they had project red iPods which seem to have been dropped now. That was for some common good.
You mean these very iPods? 8GB (Product) Red Nano 16GB (Product) Red Nano, 1GB (Product) Red Shuffle, 2GB (Product) Red Shuffle.
Okay so they are still around, my mistake. I didn't see them during the keynote. Every color but red was there. The product red availabilit wasn't mentioned as far as I know.
I wouldn't call "Pirates of Silicon Valley" a documentary. And I am sure Apple employs a few thousand people who are nicer than Steve Jobs, and I guess the same is true for Microsoft. But Steve Jobs isn't there to be nice. He is there to drive the company forward, and that is what he is doing.
It was a mere comparison. It beats parking in handicapped zones.
wtf are you even talking about?
why is it that people take things personally when a COMPANY doesnt meet every expectation you have?
Steve has been known to park in handicap spots.