the 6s plus will probably be in better shape 2 years from now because of support, but I do hear you!
Apple need to ditch the size of the 6 Plus and make the device smaller but keep the 5.5" screen IMO. It's far too big as a mobile phone and even the people I know who own it admit it's cumbersome. The Galaxy S7 edge showed what can be done and if the above rumour is true, I will be astonished Apple have recycled the same old size for a third time.
This thinner philosophy is also getting tired. Why does it need to be less than 6mm thick? Consumers want it physically smaller in its footprint, not as close to the thickness of a piece of paper.
AgreedYep.
I ask again, who gets away with competing at this pace? Nobody in the smartphone industry that I'm aware of. Only Apple.
Tell me again how hardware doesn't matter? Imagine your daily driver is the Plus vs the S7E. Tell me how design and hardware prowess doesn't matter to a physical object you pick up and use in your hands every day.
If it's all true and the iPhone 7 Pro/Plus comes out the same size as what's in the right hand, while the competition is doing what's in the left hand, well... that'd be hugely disappointing from the company that is supposed to be the leader in design and innovation.
Samsung's era was the Galaxy S3/Note 2 era, they had the highest profit at that point and seemed truly unstoppable, since then they sort of platueaued, with the only the Note series seeming untouchable, until other OEMs began pumping out good Phablets.Idk about a golden era for either Apple or Samsung honestly. The mid tier market gets stronger every year. Until the Galaxy becomes the best selling flagship it's hard to say it's their era. They're getting better though, way better. But until they become the leader with mass consumers it's still the iPhone for now. But things can change definitely.
Hopeful the iPhone SE can help stop the bleeding next quarter.
I'm not...I.agree with @Surf Donkey, want the downward trend to continue for the rest of the year as I think right now its the only way to get through to Apple.
Interesting thought. What's the saying, necessity breeds innovation? Obviously Apple isn't really in any dire danger, but it is a shame this is what it takes. And I don't mean just for Apple. Certain "fans" here, too.
I'm not...I.agree with @Surf Donkey, want the downward trend to continue for the rest of the year as I think right now it's the only way to get through to Apple.
Yeah, I would be disappointed if that's the pro. I'm hoping that they start doing a model similar to their MacBook lineup. Where they have the regular iPhone 4",4.7",5.5" at their current screen resolutions and configurations, maybe make them a little thinner and bump up the camera and processors, while reducing the price by around $100-$200.Of course this is total rumor, but if this is the iPhone 7 plus:
https://www.macrumors.com/2016/04/27/iphone-7-plus-design-drawings/
wow
I think quite a few people felt "burned" by forking out big money to go from the 6plus to 6S plus. There just wasn't much there. Fatigue is setting in to do it again for the 7 if it is this meh. Sure it will have lines, it will sell out, hype machine x 1000, but it is not going to move any barometers. Most consumers are not completely under the spell of Jony Ive Voice Overs or hyping up "Live Pictures" anymore.
Samsung gave its fans something convincing to move to with the 7. It was like fan service for them with everything they wanted. What is in these Apple 7 plans that the customers want? It is the same thing. Over and over. Even McDonalds can't pull that off anymore. Too much competition.
I think Apple stock has a downside. I don't see the SE propping up Q2 results. Buzz in Q3 will bounce it back, but if the iPhone 7 is this boring, it will go right back down. That said, it would also be a stock buying opportunity for me. Apple has the cash and the minds to do something great again.
Interesting thought. What's the saying, necessity breeds innovation? Obviously Apple isn't really in any dire danger, but it is a shame this is what it takes. And I don't mean just for Apple. Certain "fans" here, too.
Hi folks
is the Galaxy S 7 a real threat to iPhone ? how many here would switch ? could I request some one who has really studied the S7 features etc, to reply. Thanks in advance. regards. Subu
While Samsung saw profits increase 42% vs. the same time last year:Apple's sales market share figures are out.....
Sales are down profits are way down. The stock is losing billions.
Apple lost more market share and sales than the top 5 phone makers combined last quarter
Hopeful the iPhone SE can help stop the bleeding next quarter.
http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS41216716
Totally agree. Isn't it amazing how many here that their response to every request to add features to the iphone is "look at sales and profits" as a reason the iphone doesn't need new features. Guys like FFR and i7guy that always respond with sales and profits in all of their arguments. They will have to come up with a new schtick now that sales profits would hold up anymore.While Samsung saw profits increase 42% vs. the same time last year:
http://www.androidheadlines.com/2016/04/samsung-mobile-q1-2016-results-profits-are-up-42-yoy.html
Amazing how things have gone completely the opposite way of what the Samsung Haters around here were claiming last month, lol.
GS7 and GS7E said to be the reason, I clearly remember someone claiming the GS7 had failed, lmao!
Totally agree. Isn't it amazing how many here that their response to every request to add features to the iphone is "look at sales and profits" as a reason the iphone doesn't need new features. Guys like FFR and i7guy that always respond with sales and profits in all of their arguments. They will have to come up with a new schtick now that sales profits would hold up anymore.
Samsung listened to it's customers and brought back features they wanted and was rewarded with more sales and profits.
Apple did not and lost more sales and market share than the others combined.....
There is no doom and gloom for Apple long term. They will bounce back.....they have brand loyalty like no other company I have seen. But for the short term they needed this to give them a reality check.Yup. Folly either way to only argue with just sales and profit numbers. They're important to any company, of course, but they can't be the only metric. Again, how are profits a feature?
Also, I say this again because it's important and frankly because I still wouldn't bet against Apple:
Even if they did continue to post an amazing record breaking quarter, or even if they bounce back without innovation in the fall, regardless of the sales and profits, they should still try to compete as hard as we know they can. Don't we want them to be the leader in the actual technology than just sales and profits?
Regardless of the sales and profits, they are behind on hardware (who says hardware isn't important just because apple doesn't want to compete here? Remember they didn't want to compete in screen sizes either once upon a time!) and also behind on software even though this isn't as apparent.
Apple -- you want more growth? Plenty of potential customers who want the iPhone to do more, or at least match the effort in the areas where the competition ia forging ahead in. There's your growth.
I really hope they don't fragment their better features to just the Pro line. That's really unfortunate for users like me who prefer mid size devices. Not to mention I can't imagine what the price of the Pro line will be at the higher storage sizes...
I think this might signal the end of the 2 two year "s" cycle for them. This incremental upgrade cycle was built around the two year contract system. Apple knew it could rest and take a year off in between adding new features. They can't do this anymore. They need to "bring it" every year. I don't mean a total design overhaul every year but more than the "s" models have done so far.
As you said about the "pro" label, I totally agree. I really hope they don't respond buy fragmenting the iphone brand further with this concept. I hope they make all the new features available on all new iphones and not just a "pro" line and then charge extra for it. Huge fail imho.....
Apple is taking the hits on all product lines.... iPad sales are down.... Mac sales are flat
Apple watch sales have tanked YoY....
https://www.macrumors.com/2016/04/28/apple-watch-vs-android-wear-q1-2016/
I don't think so--hell, Samsung just basically adopted the same strategy with the S7, devices that are physically very close to their previous models. I think expecting these OEMs to overhaul the physical design of their phones every year is unrealistic and not cost effective for the companies themselves. The Galaxies added back removable storage and changed their camera. The iPhone also had a new camera, a new TouchID sensor, and added Force Touch. Both had their requisite internals updates. Don't really see anything dramatically different. And hasn't every S model outsold it's predecessor?
Are all Samsung phones equipped with the same functionality and hardware? Do they all have a stylus and it's associated hardware, or edge screens with the same edge software functionality? Are they all the same size? Point is that nobody has a homogenous product line and don't see what Apple is held to a different standard. And of course they will charge extra for additional features---who doesn't do that? Are the Galaxy S7 and S7 edge priced the same?
Well, let's put it in the right context. The entire smart watch industry is down significantly YoY. Samsung's smart watch sales are also down over 50%, from a quarter when their best smart watch to date wasn't even for sale. Apple was never going to maintain that ridiculously high market share for the very same reasons the iPhone couldn't do it...it's one model vs. the entire industry.
Listen, I'm not making excuses for Apple---I'm already on record in multiple posts that I'm actually glad Apple is having these 'struggles' and hope they continue for the rest of the year---but there's an awful lost of piling on going on here and not entirely accurate info.
I don't think so--hell, Samsung just basically adopted the same strategy with the S7, devices that are physically very close to their previous models. I think expecting these OEMs to overhaul the physical design of their phones every year is unrealistic and not cost effective for the companies themselves.
The Galaxies added back removable storage and changed their camera. The iPhone also had a new camera, a new TouchID sensor, and added Force Touch.
Are all Samsung phones equipped with the same functionality and hardware? Do they all have a stylus and it's associated hardware, or edge screens with the same edge software functionality? Are they all the same size? Point is that nobody has a homogenous product line and don't see what Apple is held to a different standard. And of course they will charge extra for additional features---who doesn't do that? Are the Galaxy S7 and S7 edge priced the same?
Are all Samsung phones equipped with the same functionality and hardware? Do they all have a stylus and it's associated hardware, or edge screens with the same edge software functionality?
And hasn't every S model outsold it's predecessor?
Apple was never going to maintain that ridiculously high market share for the very same reasons the iPhone couldn't do it...it's one model vs. the entire industry.
Listen, I'm not making excuses for Apple---I'm already on record in multiple posts that I'm actually glad Apple is having these 'struggles' and hope they continue for the rest of the year---but there's an awful lost of piling on going on here and not entirely accurate info.
Are all Samsung phones equipped with the same functionality and hardware? Do they all have a stylus and it's associated hardware, or edge screens with the same edge software functionality? Are they all the same size? Point is that nobody has a homogenous product line and don't see what Apple is held to a different standard. And of course they will charge extra for additional features---who doesn't do that? Are the Galaxy S7 and S7 edge priced the same?
I was speaking more to the dual camera, for the record.