In post #62 I explained how Apple has reduced value to the customer by changing from a 1 iPhone for everyone to a multiple phone with features withheld for up-sell company..
I truthfully don't think you know what force upsell even means. It's mainly taken out of context in the sense that you just don't agree with Apples strategy and they are in a position where they want consumers To have options. ,
However just to reiterate to the other readers, the following listed below is what you refuse to answer these questions, yet, you keep using wiggle room to not have to answer the questions for whatever reason. :
You didn't answer this:
Why does one iPhone have to be able to be for 'everyone'? Do you really think one iPhone because its priced at a much higher dollar that has to be for everyone? .
In post #64 you initiated a straw-man argument by stating, "Why does one iPhone have to be able to be for 'everyone'?".
And you deflected from These questions:
Apple doesn't have to be a one phone company and why should they? They have other offerings in their lineup that some consumers may or may not care about certain features, which leads me to question do consumers even utilize all the features that an iPhone has? Doubtful.
In post #65 I reaffirmed my original statement which is that Apple went from 1 iPhone to many phones with features withheld..
You didn't reaffirm anything, as indicating for a third time, you didn't answer these questions either:
Referencing the bolded in your post, hasn't that been iterated three different times now? And I think it's fairly evident Apple isn't just a 'One phone company', why should they be?
I am stopping you from committing straw-man arguments by keeping the discussion on topic. The core problem is you cannot admit I am right because that would force you to admit that you were wrong.
You seem to be conflating strawman argument versus legitimate questions actually asked of you. This is not about right or wrong, this is about discussion and what others beliefs are as well but the problem is that you fail to acknowledge anyone else's opinions.
The reality is, I'm interested in actual discussion, yet You want to push semantics and off-topic frivolous points versus discussion of actual substance. Unfortunately, the discussion really can't go any further as others have already indicated to you. If you Decide to reply, I find it be helpful if you would actually reply to the questions asked of you that I clearly highlighted in this post.
You have no intention of ever admitting that I am correct because it contradicts your viewpoint.
Actually , this doesn't make any sense. Because you're not contradicting anything by not answering any questions. You're just going off your on tangents, which is fine, but it doesn't help for the sake that your obstructing everyone else's questions asked of you.
However, back to the original point, Apple offering diversity doesn't necessarily hinder this company from having to be anything less than being a one phone company. Having an iPhone priced at $400 and all the way to $1000, it gives the consumers options in between. I don't see anything wrong with that. And, it's not expected for Apple to be the same company they were over 10 years ago.
Last edited: