Antennagate 1.0:
Cocky then, cocky now. In a way, admitting there is an issue ONLY because it blew up in the media... but they also, in between the lines, trash talked other smartphones within that time. According to Apple, other popular smartphones had antenna issues just as bad as the iPhone 4 did. They even claimed the 4 had a decrease in dropped call rates than the 3GS. Even IF Apple ever decides to make an official statement like this, I have a feeling I’ll be awhile and they’ll make it seem like other popular smartphones are suffering just as bad as the XS and XSM. It drives me nuts, in that keynote, Steve talks about signal bars instead of the actual quality of the connection. Bars don’t mean anything. All they will want to do is adjust how many bars will display for whatever quality of connection and it’ll make everyone think it’s fixed.
“A very small percentage of users” seems to be a very popular phrase with Apple.
Steve was cocky but it made him, and Apple who it was (and is)... that that has positives and negatives.
Ask yourself if Tim Cook would get on stage and do this today.
.. for a ‘numbers’ person the metrics used were a tad early on the ‘event’ scale IMO. I think they could have looked different weeks later. Maybe same.. maybe worse.
Looking back on this, with the perspective of time, I think Apple did the best thing they could do. They were right that the same behavior was exhibited by other smartphones. How many other CEOs got on stage to adddress theirs?
I had the 4 and 4S. I remember them being some of the best iPhones ever made. If you run a poll, and they have been run here, the iPhone 4 is up at the top of most popular iPhones ever made.
I think with all of that said...that would be all the more reason to not repeat the ‘event’/issue. We will see what happens.
[doublepost=1538489660][/doublepost]
Apple has been very aggressive about it: deleting negative posts, etc. I take all these official sites now with a huge pile of salt. I don't think they want to be in Apple's crosshairs, hence no real critique there. Like that PCMag test: it's just too good to be true, seems too polished and candy coated to me compared to what people are saying here. Also, how very conveniently they could't find a Qualcomm X on iOS12. I call it BS.
I can tell you with 100% certainty that MANY ‘Apple’ sites/media orgs will be VERY cautious about what they report regarding Apple issues.
I have shared blatant and repeatable evidence on several issues to several respected Apple sites and my information was ignored.