Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Is the new Mac Pro a Failure for traditional Mac Creative and Professional customers


  • Total voters
    417
Status
Not open for further replies.
10 USB ports is not enough. I want 11!

Did you guys see this? (sorry if it has already been posted, it's friday I just feel lazy and don't want to read back ;))

http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/mac/...-usbc-thunderbolt3-skylake-processor-3536364/


Another clue that this is the Mac Pro is the fact that the code hints that there are 10 USB 3.0 ports. Currently there are 4 USB ports and 6 Thunderbolt 2 ports on the Mac Pro. We think that adopting Thunderbolt 3 on the Mac Pro may make more sense as it brings Thunderbolt to USB-C at 40Gbps, for the best of both worlds, more on that below...
 
Not sure if those were installed on a MP ...

Well, on a workstation designed with external connections in mind, a good number of USB ports are welcomed. But 10 seem a very high number (I was thinking about 6 as the right number).

Keep in mind, 6,1 features six thunderbolt 2 ports and four usb 3.0 ports (ten counted out). If I had to speculate, the next revision would likely feature either ten usb-c/thunderbolt 3 ports or four usb 3 and six usb-c/thunderbolt 3 ports in the respective position of the previous generation.
 
There wasn't much "response" to #79 because it's the same list of stuff that has already been pointed out hundreds of times on this forum. It always circles back to some customers (and potential customers) are upset by the nMP update, and most customers are not, and most importantly, none of this endless debating is going to change anything.

Well that's more than a touch disingenuous. Obviously most customers, if not all, of the nMP are happy with it. They bought it! That doesn't mean most pros/creatives are, and as the votes show, most dont like it. Ah right, this is the secret agenda of the he-man-nMP-haters-club-agenda'athon. You found us out.

Everyone was free to vote how they liked regardless of what you perceive my agenda to be. Perhaps you have one of your own, but you still get only one vote, as did all the others that cared to vote.

I find it amazing how easily you discount the displeasure of so many potential customers here in this thread, while complaining of your displeasure of them doing the same in 'your other' threads.
 
Well that's more than a touch disingenuous. Obviously most customers, if not all, of the nMP are happy with it. They bought it! That doesn't mean most pros/creatives are, and as the votes show, most dont like it. Ah right, this is the secret agenda of the he-man-nMP-haters-club-agenda'athon. You found us out.

Everyone was free to vote how they liked regardless of what you perceive my agenda to be. Perhaps you have one of your own, but you still get only one vote, as did all the others that cared to vote.

I find it amazing how easily you discount the displeasure of so many potential customers here in this thread, while complaining of your displeasure of them doing the same in 'your other' threads.
That you think your poll is actually meaningful only indicates that you're not a person to be taken seriously. That your take away from my post is that I "discount the displeasure" with the nMP only indicates you have a total lack of reading comprehension. I gave a sincere and thoughtful reply to ActionMango, who while we don't agree on everything, I think we'd probably agree on more things than not, and I generally respect his contributions here.

In all honesty, I anticipated that the person to reply would ignore the entire point of my post and focus in on that one word "most". What's so obvious is that you don't have a rational response to why you carry on this endless nonsense, so you focus on semantics and cherry picking arguments and "the poll". Personally, I don't care - I don't need the validation of a poll in order to feel good about the computer I use. I haven't voted and I haven't looked at the results.

But just for sake of argument, let's say that out in the real world (the "real world" being not the forum where computer geeks hang out chatting about what washers to use when upgrading their MP 4,1 CPUs), the majority of "Creative and Pros" (which is clearly undefinable) really do think the Mac Pro is a failure. What then? What's the point of "winning" that debate? What have you accomplished other than another 20 pages of debating something that ultimately doesn't matter?

I get it - sometimes it feels good to vent and share in the frustration with similar-minded folks, and that's cool for a thread like this - I appreciate it and not sure why you're bent out of shape about having it pointed out. I occasionally vent as well. And sometimes it's just a discussion for the sake of a discussion. We're just well past the point where it's acceptable to bring it up in every nMP thread.

Instead of a meaningless poll, here's a genuine idea for you folks so unhappy with the nMP: start one of those internet petitions outlining what the next Mac Pro should be. Get even a 100,000 signatures - that might actually send a message to Apple.
 
Well that's more than a touch disingenuous. Obviously most customers, if not all, of the nMP are happy with it. They bought it! That doesn't mean most pros/creatives are, and as the votes show, most dont like it. Ah right, this is the secret agenda of the he-man-nMP-haters-club-agenda'athon. You found us out.

Everyone was free to vote how they liked regardless of what you perceive my agenda to be. Perhaps you have one of your own, but you still get only one vote, as did all the others that cared to vote.

I find it amazing how easily you discount the displeasure of so many potential customers here in this thread, while complaining of your displeasure of them doing the same in 'your other' threads.

It isn't so much that we discount that some people aren't happy with the nMP, it is just that it feels as if sometimes that is ALL that we are getting in threads. As I have said previously, we get that there is a subset of Mac Pro owners that don't like the direction that Apple is going/has gone. The point has been made ( over and over and over again ), and is at the point where is in danger of overshadowing some of the vey good and valued assistance that is offered by those people. Hence why you are feeling that others are dismissive. You are now getting a "not this **** again" response, as has been done to death already.

As Apple have shown previously it is Apples Way or the Highway, if you don't like Apples products, they don't meet your needs then there are alternatives available ( which they argued successfully to a Judge in the Pystar case ). If Apple really don't make products that people want then they won't sell, and Apple will stop making for that area, or start making products that will sell. ( with the cash reserves then doubt they will go under )

240 votes in a forum, 134 failure, 96 isn't a failure ( at time of posting ) isn't really a meaningful number, compared to the number of Mac Pro boxes out there. I know it isn't a big seller but would be happy to go on the record that Apple have sold more then that number of Mac Pro's, let along how many just to Creative/Professional Users. ( I own one and don't consider myself in those categories ) No doubt the results of this poll will end up on someones website "proving" that the nMP is a failure, and people talk about Apples BS dept.

To be honest from the forum traffic voicing dissatisfaction with the nMP then was surprised that was only 58.3% saying was a failure.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JoSch
This thread got me thinking so much, that I wound up buying an ugly gaming system (because I got a very good deal on it).

So, what happens when the lack of expansion capabilities prompts a 25yr Mac user to switch? Less than two days in, with my big & goofy gaming box, and here are my likes & dislikes, so far:

Likes, so far:
  • Drive Flexibility - Whoa, this is what I've been missing! I got a really good deal (~$650 for everything) on a few SSDs (1 512 NVMe and 2x1TB SATA drives, card, adapters, etc.). I made the NVMe primary boot, and striped the SATA drives in RAID 0 as a data array. Everything is lightning fast, and I still have plenty of room for expansion. I plan on hooking up the small SATA SSD that came with the system as a cache for a spinner (Intel utility) and still have room for bulk drives.
  • GPU Power & flexibility - Easy to switch from SLI mode (if I ever do games) to using the cards disparately, which is how I'll likely use them the most.
  • Power - I know, benchmarks suck, but getting 23,000+ on the Geekbench 32 bit multicore without even pushing things is pretty darn nice. Admittedly, this system is much faster than I need, at least for now.
  • Case Flexibility - I have space for just about everything I'll need, probably for the next 5 or so years.
  • Price - I bought this system at a significant discount, but the price-performance is impressive, especially vs the Apple world.
Dislikes, so far:
  • Backup - really miss Time Machine, and am confused by the myriad of backup options, most of which cost money. I didn't have to deal with this much on my prior Windows systems, as none of them were mission-critical, but this is a bit of a hassle now that I'm looking at maintaining my primary work & home system. Really, I'm surprised that the Windows world is so far behind on this.
  • Vendor-specific drivers - Forgot how much of a pain it was to have to hunt around for drivers, at vendor sites, to optimize the system. Ran into an issue where the NVMe wasn't recognized as a boot drive, until I got a utility directly from the drive vendor. Stuff like this is a hassle.
  • Noise - Fan noise is there, though not that bad. It's louder than the nMP, and louder than my old iMac, except for when the iMac is being pushed (my iMac can certainly get louder than this system, when it's pushed). But it is quieter than my old 2009 Mac Pro, from what I remember. Also, it doesn't seem to get significantly louder when pushed hard - I tried, and barely noticed any difference. I guess I'm just getting used to the whoosh of towers again, after a long hiatus. Still, my home office has a couple noise-makers (ductless A/C and small fridge, which are louder when they're running. So, it's not that bad, but still a bit noticeable.
  • Ugly - It lives under the desk, so it's not a huge deal, but I still find this thing ugly.
  • Heterogenous UI - This isn't a huge deal, but still a bit "different". Much like searching for drivers, various config elements are vendor-specific. So, I need to muddle through different GUIs to change characteristics: Alienware GUI for fans and O/C, NVIDIA GUI for GPU tweaks, Samsung GUI for drive behavior, MS GUI for basic system, etc. This is pretty minor and it was dead-simple to organize these into one area, but the lack of standardization is still a bit of a pain. for example, the NVIDIA GUI scales badly, with 4k.
  • Mice Still Suck - I do miss trackpad gestures, and will likely see how well one of my old Apple trackpads works with Win 10.

Overall, this system is frighteningly fast. It just feels a bit awkward so far. we'll see if I get used to it?

Regarding performance, I haven't yet done much other than run a few benchmarks. Drive performance and flexibility was important to me, and I feel that's great so far. My primary NVMe drive is getting ~1,600 MBs read and ~1,500 write, which is great for me. I'm told I can get North of 2,000 by using another slot and running the migration utility again, but at this point the numbers are academic.. Also, my RAID 0 SATA stripe is North of 900 read/write, which i great for me. then there are the three other open bays I have, which I can use for media I have scattered all about. So, drive and I/O wise, I'm happy.

But I do reserve the right to sell it and switch to a Mac Pro, should Apple ever release a platform that I can easily upgrade and modify again.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Flint Ironstag
240 votes in a forum, 134 failure, 96 isn't a failure ( at time of posting ) isn't really a meaningful number, compared to the number of Mac Pro boxes out there.
That was a nice post, and I'm also surprised to hear it's actually that close - but I think it's correlated with my theory that most folks who like the nMP have given up on participating in these discussions... it's a waste of time arguing with trolls.

However let's not indirectly give undeserved credibility to the poll by suggesting sample size is the issue.

The main issue from a "polling" standpoint is that MacRumors - across the board, but particularly this subforum - is not representative of Mac users or computer users in general. Anybody that knows the first thing about polling and statistics looks at who's participating in the poll. Even the very title of the thread is like catnip to a specific subset of forum regulars.

Ultimately it just leads back to my original point though. The nMP ship has already sailed, so taking a poll on whether people like the boat or not is pointless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thefredelement
my theory that most folks who like the nMP have given up on participating in these discussions.

It really is a shame. I wish they'd break up the forums into cMP and nMP but that would drastically reduce the page views these flame wars generate. There are a lot of nMP owners who come to these forums for help and advice on how to use their systems and end up having to wade through these threads.
 
This thread got me thinking so much, that I wound up buying an ugly gaming system (because I got a very good deal on it).

So, what happens when the lack of expansion capabilities prompts a 25yr Mac user to switch? Less than two days in, with my big & goofy gaming box, and here are my likes & dislikes, so far:

Likes, so far:
  • Drive Flexibility - Whoa, this is what I've been missing! I got a really good deal (~$650 for everything) on a few SSDs (1 512 NVMe and 2x1TB SATA drives, card, adapters, etc.). I made the NVMe primary boot, and striped the SATA drives in RAID 0 as a data array. Everything is lightning fast, and I still have plenty of room for expansion. I plan on hooking up the small SATA SSD that came with the system as a cache for a spinner (Intel utility) and still have room for bulk drives.
  • GPU Power & flexibility - Easy to switch from SLI mode (if I ever do games) to using the cards disparately, which is how I'll likely use them the most.
  • Power - I know, benchmarks suck, but getting 23,000+ on the Geekbench 32 bit multicore without even pushing things is pretty darn nice. Admittedly, this system is much faster than I need, at least for now.
  • Case Flexibility - I have space for just about everything I'll need, probably for the next 5 or so years.
  • Price - I bought this system at a significant discount, but the price-performance is impressive, especially vs the Apple world.
Dislikes, so far:
  • Backup - really miss Time Machine, and am confused by the myriad of backup options, most of which cost money. I didn't have to deal with this much on my prior Windows systems, as none of them were mission-critical, but this is a bit of a hassle now that I'm looking at maintaining my primary work & home system. Really, I'm surprised that the Windows world is so far behind on this.
  • Vendor-specific drivers - Forgot how much of a pain it was to have to hunt around for drivers, at vendor sites, to optimize the system. Ran into an issue where the NVMe wasn't recognized as a boot drive, until I got a utility directly from the drive vendor. Stuff like this is a hassle.
  • Noise - Fan noise is there, though not that bad. It's louder than the nMP, and louder than my old iMac, except for when the iMac is being pushed (my iMac can certainly get louder than this system, when it's pushed). But it is quieter than my old 2009 Mac Pro, from what I remember. Also, it doesn't seem to get significantly louder when pushed hard - I tried, and barely noticed any difference. I guess I'm just getting used to the whoosh of towers again, after a long hiatus. Still, my home office has a couple noise-makers (ductless A/C and small fridge, which are louder when they're running. So, it's not that bad, but still a bit noticeable.
  • Ugly - It lives under the desk, so it's not a huge deal, but I still find this thing ugly.
  • Heterogenous UI - This isn't a huge deal, but still a bit "different". Much like searching for drivers, various config elements are vendor-specific. So, I need to muddle through different GUIs to change characteristics: Alienware GUI for fans and O/C, NVIDIA GUI for GPU tweaks, Samsung GUI for drive behavior, MS GUI for basic system, etc. This is pretty minor and it was dead-simple to organize these into one area, but the lack of standardization is still a bit of a pain. for example, the NVIDIA GUI scales badly, with 4k.
  • Mice Still Suck - I do miss trackpad gestures, and will likely see how well one of my old Apple trackpads works with Win 10.

Overall, this system is frighteningly fast. It just feels a bit awkward so far. we'll see if I get used to it?

Regarding performance, I haven't yet done much other than run a few benchmarks. Drive performance and flexibility was important to me, and I feel that's great so far. My primary NVMe drive is getting ~1,600 MBs read and ~1,500 write, which is great for me. I'm told I can get North of 2,000 by using another slot and running the migration utility again, but at this point the numbers are academic.. Also, my RAID 0 SATA stripe is North of 900 read/write, which i great for me. then there are the three other open bays I have, which I can use for media I have scattered all about. So, drive and I/O wise, I'm happy.

But I do reserve the right to sell it and switch to a Mac Pro, should Apple ever release a platform that I can easily upgrade and modify again.
thank you for the first impression, well written and summarized.
Nothing really new, but I'm happy about the performance level you reached.
Most of the "cons" you listed here are deal breakers for me.
Ugly, drivers, backup and incoherent UI are some of the points that make me love Apple so much. Even at the cost of performance.
 
Yep, it was a bit of a hiccup, but I guess it makes sense. In fairness, I guess some of that is the price you pay for openness and extensibility. Most of my recent MS experience has either ben with MS hardware (eg. SP3) or unchanged OEM systems (eg Dell XPS laptop). With MS hardware, configs changes and updates are pretty easy, as MS controls the whole stack (much like Apple). With OEM systems (eg. Dell), one needs to use the vendor's config solution which will analyze your config and suggest changes. This worked well on my new system, until I started bolting on 3rd party stuffs. But once I started adding components will-nilly, I did have to poke around vendor sites a bit. I guess that is one downside of extensibility.

But the lack of an integrated backup is somewhat perplexing, given how long Apple has had Time Machine. The Dell system does have a very basic backup, but not full-featured enough to suit my needs. There's a more full-featured one, but they want ~$30 for it, which seems like nickel and diming to me. really, I'm not sure why MS doesn't just take a page from Apple on this?

And the ugly part, well you just can't six that. But I can sure enough hide it under my desktop, which is whee it will spend its life. I will say that, butt-ugluy as this system is, it's an absolute pleasure to work on. The case is very roomy, and the design facilitates an incredible amount of airflow with minimal mechanics assistance (pyramid-shaped). I'll play with the fan controls later, but pretty sure I can all but turn fans off, while still maintaining good temps at normal load. and the little touches are nice, like interior lights that come up to facilitate working on the system, when it's unplugged and the case is opened.

Still, the migration is scary. And I wouldn't have embarked upon it, if the mac Pro was current and a bit more extensible. Time will tell how it works out?

My next step is to migrate my Apple ecosystem over to the PC. That's pretty much the most daunting part, for me.


thank you for the first impression, well written and summarized.
Nothing really new, but I'm happy about the performance level you reached.
Most of the "cons" you listed here are deal breakers for me.
Ugly, drivers, backup and incoherent UI are some of the points that make me love Apple so much. Even at the cost of performance.
 
Last edited:
But the lack of an integrated backup is somewhat perplexing, given how long Apple has had Time Machine. The Dell system does have a very basic backup, but not full-featured enough to suit my needs. There's a more full-featured one, but they want ~$30 for it, which seems like nickel and diming to me. really, I'm not sure why MS doesn't just take a page from Apple on this.

http://www.tomshardware.com/faq/id-2569587/back-windows.html

At least a full system backup is included....
 
It does what I want it to do, far better than the Mac I was using previously. I like the idea of adding all the peripherals that I need without having to mess around in the interior. I have a flatbed scanner, a video deck, two Thunderbolt RAID arrays, a film/slide scanner, a 4K display, a WACOM tablet, two DVD drives and a multiformat media reader/writer attached. I do a lot of video conversions using handbrake, FCP 10.1, and Compressor. I also use Dreamweaver and Illustrator CS6. Some video processing that used to take hours is finished in minutes.

I guess I say that it's a success.
 
Ah right, this is the secret agenda of the he-man-nMP-haters-club-agenda'athon. You found us out.

What "he-man-nMP-haters-club-agenda'athon?"
He-Man.png
 
I find it amazing how easily you discount the displeasure of so many potential customers here in this thread, while complaining of your displeasure of them doing the same in 'your other' threads.
I find it amazing how easily you discount the pleasure of so many potential customers here in this thread, while complaining of your displeasure of them doing the same in 'your other' threads.
 
That you think your poll is actually meaningful only indicates that you're not a person to be taken seriously. That your take away from my post is that I "discount the displeasure" with the nMP only indicates you have a total lack of reading comprehension. I gave a sincere and thoughtful reply to ActionMango, who while we don't agree on everything, I think we'd probably agree on more things than not, and I generally respect his contributions here.

The feeling is more than mutual.

In all honesty, I anticipated that the person to reply would ignore the entire point of my post and focus in on that one word "most". What's so obvious is that you don't have a rational response to why you carry on this endless nonsense, so you focus on semantics and cherry picking arguments and "the poll". Personally, I don't care - I don't need the validation of a poll in order to feel good about the computer I use. I haven't voted and I haven't looked at the results.

In all honesty you are acting in a manner consistent with your professed disgust of the 'types' in this thread. You seem to me the last person that should be speaking about rationality, as if your displayed hypocrisy is consistent with that notion.

But just for sake of argument, let's say that out in the real world (the "real world" being not the forum where computer geeks hang out chatting about what washers to use when upgrading their MP 4,1 CPUs), the majority of "Creative and Pros" (which is clearly undefinable) really do think the Mac Pro is a failure. What then? What's the point of "winning" that debate? What have you accomplished other than another 20 pages of debating something that ultimately doesn't matter?

It's not a debate, and frankly has never been much of one. You don't win. You don't get a cookie. You accomplish in raising voices. In getting the press to pick up on the issue. And perhaps put some pressure on apple to do more/better in the future. With the FCPX brohahaa, it has Apple focusing more on building that up. Perhaps they always were going to anyway, but it certainly lit a fire under that issue. With any of the 'gate issues, it got those resolved faster or in the next iteration of the problem. With focus on DVD burning/DVideo instead of rip/burn/mix, it got the company back on focus.

If you think you can never influence a company and/or apple, that's your right of opinion, but others disagree. The hope is to put enough of a spotlight on the issue to get some traction. Although a fee articles sprouted up over this, probably not near enough to get it to that high a profile to get apple to feel the burn. But hey, at least I tried. I didn't just sit in forum being a critical 'nothing will change things' troll. And if it doesnt matter, and you're so above it. Why are you still here. You profess you dont like when the 'type' of poster hate just has an agenda to hate the nMP (because apparently there is never a legit reason to do so) infiltrates every other thread, yet here you are, doing the same thing to that 'type' when they finally did what you said, and found a thread of their own. Seems to me you protest too much.

I get it - sometimes it feels good to vent and share in the frustration with similar-minded folks, and that's cool for a thread like this - I appreciate it and not sure why you're bent out of shape about having it pointed out. I occasionally vent as well. And sometimes it's just a discussion for the sake of a discussion. We're just well past the point where it's acceptable to bring it up in every nMP thread.

No you dont get it. Sometimes voicing things, if enough people do so, can change things.

Instead of a meaningless poll, here's a genuine idea for you folks so unhappy with the nMP: start one of those internet petitions outlining what the next Mac Pro should be. Get even a 100,000 signatures - that might actually send a message to Apple.

You are such a relentlessly belittling and insulting sort aren't you. It's not meaningless. It may be scientifically inaccurate, but it does mean something when most the folks in a mac pro forum think the product is a failure. You find your meaning, and others will find theirs. Your opinion only counts more to you.

It isn't so much that we discount that some people aren't happy with the nMP, it is just that it feels as if sometimes that is ALL that we are getting in threads. As I have said previously, we get that there is a subset of Mac Pro owners that don't like the direction that Apple is going/has gone. The point has been made ( over and over and over again ), and is at the point where is in danger of overshadowing some of the vey good and valued assistance that is offered by those people. Hence why you are feeling that others are dismissive. You are now getting a "not this **** again" response, as has been done to death already.

If that's all people are saying in a Mac pro forum, that may be a sign. And fair enough, it's a free country. You put an opinion out there, not surprising you get other opinions in return, including, 'I'm sick of hearing this.' But what is fascinating to me is that people that claim 'im tired of this topic' would make a bee line for this topic, read everything in the thread, and continue to bemoan how it goes on. if you don't like it, get out of the thread. Because YOURE sick of it, doesnt mean everyone that is not sick of it should shut up. You dont like it, you're free to leave. Because you've seen and read about this topic doesnt mean everyone else has. The world does not revolve around those that are tired. You're tired, fine, go rest somewhere as others are not tired of this topic, clearly.

As Apple have shown previously it is Apples Way or the Highway, if you don't like Apples products, they don't meet your needs then there are alternatives available ( which they argued successfully to a Judge in the Pystar case ). If Apple really don't make products that people want then they won't sell, and Apple will stop making for that area, or start making products that will sell. ( with the cash reserves then doubt they will go under )

Well that is a fascinating opinion of how apple works. But apple has reacted to many uproars from it's users. Any of the 'gate issues. The feedback for losing focus on DVD/Video instead of rip/mix/burn. Small iphone screens need to get bigger. There are lots of times where they have reacted to feedback, so it's not just their way or the high way IMO. You can make a difference, people can make a difference, if they get their voices loud enough.

240 votes in a forum, 134 failure, 96 isn't a failure ( at time of posting ) isn't really a meaningful number, compared to the number of Mac Pro boxes out there. I know it isn't a big seller but would be happy to go on the record that Apple have sold more then that number of Mac Pro's, let along how many just to Creative/Professional Users. ( I own one and don't consider myself in those categories ) No doubt the results of this poll will end up on someones website "proving" that the nMP is a failure, and people talk about Apples BS dept.

To be honest from the forum traffic voicing dissatisfaction with the nMP then was surprised that was only 58.3% saying was a failure.

Well then consider yourself educated on the forum breakdown. And the poll is meaningful. It means something that a Mac Pro forum is mostly against the latest product. What that means is not something scientifically gaugeable, but so what, few polls are. Just as market research isnt scientifically accurate, yet companies frequently use it to gauge product direction. And although apple doesnt go by market research, they have reacted to negative feedback about their products in the past, with fixes/improvements from that feedback.

That was a nice post, and I'm also surprised to hear it's actually that close - but I think it's correlated with my theory that most folks who like the nMP have given up on participating in these discussions... it's a waste of time arguing with trolls.

However let's not indirectly give undeserved credibility to the poll by suggesting sample size is the issue.

The main issue from a "polling" standpoint is that MacRumors - across the board, but particularly this subforum - is not representative of Mac users or computer users in general. Anybody that knows the first thing about polling and statistics looks at who's participating in the poll. Even the very title of the thread is like catnip to a specific subset of forum regulars.

Ultimately it just leads back to my original point though. The nMP ship has already sailed, so taking a poll on whether people like the boat or not is pointless.

As opposed to your scientific OPINION theorizing that people dont respond and dont participate. What a joke.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The feeling is more than mutual.

Well then consider yourself educated on the forum breakdown. And the poll is meaningful. It means something that a Mac Pro forum is mostly against the latest product. What that means is not something scientifically gaugeable, but so what, few polls are. Just as market research isnt scientifically accurate, yet companies frequently use it to gauge product direction. And although apple doesnt go by market research, they have reacted to negative feedback about their products in the past, with fixes/improvements from that feedback.

As opposed to your scientific OPINION theorizing that people dont respond and dont participate. What a joke.

I don't think Apple is going to do anything over the opinion of 233, sorry, 135, voters (as of this posting) in an online forum. It's just not a big enough number. You mention media reports and issues that effect millions of users, this poll is not that.

If over the last couple of years they've had repeated feedback from their business departments then maybe that will maybe prompt a change.

That last statement makes me think a few thoughts, either the people who use the Mac Pro don't really post here, they don't want to take part in this poll, or people who have negative opinions are (ever so slightly) more active than those who have positive opinions.

233 is not an anything in the scope of the Mac Pro. Not in units sold, opinions, owners, feedback, feature request, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: edanuff
I don't think Apple is going to do anything over the opinion of 233, sorry, 135, voters (as of this posting) in an online forum. It's just not a big enough number. You mention media reports and issues that effect millions of users, this poll is not that.

If over the last couple of years they've had repeated feedback from their business departments then maybe that will maybe prompt a change.

That last statement makes me think a few thoughts, either the people who use the Mac Pro don't really post here, they don't want to take part in this poll, or people who have negative opinions are (ever so slightly) more active than those who have positive opinions.

233 is not an anything in the scope of the Mac Pro. Not in units sold, opinions, owners, feedback, feature request, etc.
how many of this 233 users actually own a MP ? I bet less than 50 .... maybe less than 20.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thefredelement
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.