Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Is the new Mac Pro a Failure for traditional Mac Creative and Professional customers


  • Total voters
    417
Status
Not open for further replies.
Someone who buys one to support their work/business, gets a tax write-off, and doesn't spend 20hrs a week stalking the MP boards to post the same, tired, comments on every single thread?
And those who no longer buy one because it no longer meets their needs? Are the no longer real Mac Pro users?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sawtooth811
And then there's the flip-side of the argument, where Apple is supposed to be the solution that "just works", which is why we pay a premium for it. the speakers should have just worked, without the poster having to do much of anything about it, and apparently they didn't. The Apple Software should have just run faster on Apple hardware, without the user having to do much about it, and apparently it did not. for the most part, we don't buy macs because we want to fiddle with stuff, we buy them because we want them to just work. And with the nMP hasn't Apple made trade-offs (eg. a lack of extensibility) to take that model to the extreme?

It reminds me of a usability session 25 or so years ago, when we hired a few test users to try to install our Mac Software. There were a dozen or so of us behind one-way glass, as users came into the test room to try to install our software. We had three users lined up, which was supposed to take about two hours. An hour and a half into trying, the first user just up and quit the program, saying she didn't need or want the fee, without having gotten anywhere with our software.

And those of us on the other side of the glass quickly went from muttering "stupid user" to "stupid us". Again, we pay a premium for Macs to just work, especially if the whole stack if Apple hardware and software. If, for example, the internal speaker didn't work, I don;t see that as a user error, but Apple's.
It sounds like the OPs issues are specific to that machine as others have posted it operates fine under the described circumstances. It also seems unreasonable to assume there's a platform problem as the OPs issues don't appear to be wide spread.
 
What is a "real MP" user?
Someone that isn't just a tech geek looking for a gaming/DIY machine pretending to be a pro ....

But Apple has been down this road before...

apple_mac_g4_cube.jpg


While some absolutely loved this path, the majority of the market didn't bite.

But yes, there were some die-hards for whom the death of that little cube crushed.
It was a jewel of engineering ... It was just poorly priced, but if you call it a failure, well, you aren't an Apple user.

Someone who buys one to support their work/business, gets a tax write-off, and doesn't spend 20hrs a week stalking the MP boards to post the same, tired, comments on every single thread?
You should put that in your signature :p

Is it user error that the nMP doesn't have slots?
it is designed to be that way. Most of the pro I know NEVER used any slot after have bought the computer.

Is it user error the nMP doesn't have internal storage?
Last time I checked , the MP 6,1 HAS internal storage, BTO up to 1 Tb SSD.

Is it user error the nMP is limited to a single CPU?
It is designed to have a single CPU with 12 cores.
Frankly I don't know anyone who actually need more...
Yes, it could exist, but I just think it's not in the target market of the Mac Pro.


And those who no longer buy one because it no longer meets their needs? Are the no longer real Mac Pro users?
exactly.
The Mac Pro 6,1 has a different philosophy behind ... if you need a box where put whatever you want, that's not the machine for you. Deal with it and move on.
 
Bingo! I so wish that Apple still made a machine for me.

It's not about whether the nMP is the machine for you. It's about the fact Apple no longer offers a machine "for you". This seems to be a concept that escapes you.
 
It's not about whether the nMP is the machine for you. It's about the fact Apple no longer offers a machine "for you". This seems to be a concept that escapes you.
Apple can't please everybody.
There are people happier with a MP 6,1 than with a bulky box like the MP 5,1 (I know personally).
You are not one of them, fine.

If they are targeting the wrong user base, they will redesign the Mac Pro in the next iteration, otherwise they are happy about the sales numbers achieved.
 
Apple can't please everybody.
There are people happier with a MP 6,1 than with a bulky box like the MP 5,1 (I know personally).
You are not one of them, fine.

If they are targeting the wrong user base, they will redesign the Mac Pro in the next iteration, otherwise they are happy about the sales numbers achieved.
No, they can't. But they ended up pleasing even fewer people with the nMP. As for the people who are happier I have a difficult time believing that...at least those who are pros. Maybe those who want a piece of fashion but the cMP offered almost everything the nMP offers save for size.
 
I don't think Apple is going to do anything over the opinion of 233, sorry, 135, voters (as of this posting) in an online forum. It's just not a big enough number. You mention media reports and issues that effect millions of users, this poll is not that.

If over the last couple of years they've had repeated feedback from their business departments then maybe that will maybe prompt a change.

That last statement makes me think a few thoughts, either the people who use the Mac Pro don't really post here, they don't want to take part in this poll, or people who have negative opinions are (ever so slightly) more active than those who have positive opinions.

233 is not an anything in the scope of the Mac Pro. Not in units sold, opinions, owners, feedback, feature request, etc.

That's great that YOU don't think so. And I agree. But if a news outlet picks up on this thread. And then more news outlets pick up on it. and It grows to something more, it might. Nothing will happen if you don't try. Your nay saying.

The last thing you say is sheer unsubstantiated opinion on your part that they don't post here. Clearly some portion does. That you seem to have an agenda in saying they are all so busy is your biased view only, with no decent theory, much less scientifically valid evidence to back it up.
 
how many of this 233 users actually own a MP ? I bet less than 50 .... maybe less than 20.

Do you bet? Really? Wow. We should really weigh that for what it's worth. Less than nothing. It's just your baseless unscientific opinion. One that is insulting to the users here. You 'just know' sage that you are.
 
That's great that YOU don't think so. And I agree. But if a news outlet picks up on this thread. And then more news outlets pick up on it. and It grows to something more, it might. Nothing will happen if you don't try. Your nay saying.

The last thing you say is sheer unsubstantiated opinion on your part that they don't post here. Clearly some portion does. That you seem to have an agenda in saying they are all so busy is your biased view only, with no decent theory, much less scientifically valid evidence to back it up.

You make me LOL.

You're right, your but ifs are so scientific, as is your agenda.

P.S. Unless you think Apple only sold 200 and something Mac Pros then they don't post here.
 
That's great that YOU don't think so. And I agree. But if a news outlet picks up on this thread. And then more news outlets pick up on it. and It grows to something more, it might. Nothing will happen if you don't try. Your nay saying.

The last thing you say is sheer unsubstantiated opinion on your part that they don't post here. Clearly some portion does. That you seem to have an agenda in saying they are all so busy is your biased view only, with no decent theory, much less scientifically valid evidence to back it up.

So you made a thread, as a poll but hope that some news outlet is going to pick up on it?

Pick up on what, exactly? Please enlighten me.
 
And this reply was so incredibly substantial?

Just get a Dell. (there's some substance for you).
Believe it or not it has more substance than your troll response. IMO the troll claim is the most idiotic of posts. If you feel someone is trolling then stop responding to them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sawtooth811
No, they can't. But they ended up pleasing even fewer people with the nMP. As for the people who are happier I have a difficult time believing that...at least those who are pros. Maybe those who want a piece of fashion but the cMP offered almost everything the nMP offers save for size.
DO you actually know the MP 6,1 sales are lower than MP 5,1 ?
Or are you judging the MP market using a little poll on a geek's forum ?
I don't know MP 6,1 numbers, and you neither ....
You think it's only "fashion", others may think differently.

Do you bet? Really? Wow. We should really weigh that for what it's worth. Less than nothing. It's just your baseless unscientific opinion. One that is insulting to the users here. You 'just know' sage that you are.
I'm quite sure you aren't one ...
I'm not insulting anyone, and I can see a very few MP users here.
 
Believe it or not it has more substance than your troll response. IMO the troll claim is the most idiotic of posts. If you feel someone is trolling then stop responding to them.

Yet you responded directly to it, what is that then, troll inception?

It looks like a lot of people are really sad that Apple changed a computer design two years ago.

If you're all this upset after two years I think it's time to figure out how you will move on.

Unless of course CNN sees this thread and maybe Taylor Swift writes a letter about it, then maybe, just maybe it'll change.
 
DO you actually know the MP 6,1 sales are lower than MP 5,1 ?
Or are you judging the MP market using a little poll on a geek's forum ?
I don't know MP 6,1 numbers, and you neither ....
You think it's only "fashion", others may think differently.
I don't recall an outcry about the cMP...are you aware of any? The concerns I hear raised about the nMP are legitimate. There was zero reason for Apple to reduce the size of the MP at the expense of functionality. I think my argument is much more plausible than yours.
 
Yet you responded directly to it, what is that then, troll inception?

It looks like a lot of people are really sad that Apple changed a computer design two years ago.

If you're all this upset after two years I think it's time to figure out how you will move on.

Unless of course CNN sees this thread and maybe Taylor Swift writes a letter about it, then maybe, just maybe it'll change.
I don't recall saying you were trolling...perhaps I missed it...would you be so kind as to point it out?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sawtooth811
I don't recall an outcry about the cMP...are you aware of any? The concerns I hear raised about the nMP are legitimate. There was zero reason for Apple to reduce the size of the MP at the expense of functionality. I think my argument is much more plausible than yours.
I actually recall people outcry about EVERYTHING Apple made. Literally.
Apple employs very talented engineers and market analysts , so they surely had reasons to redesign the Mac Pro.
I don't know if they were wrong or right.
On a commercial point of view, only sales numbers could answer the question.
 
I actually recall people outcry about EVERYTHING Apple made. Literally.
Apple employs very talented engineers and market analysts , so they surely had reasons to redesign the Mac Pro.
I don't know if they were wrong or right.
On a commercial point of view, only sales numbers could answer the question.
I suspect the sales numbers are lower for the nMP than the cMP...at least with those who want to get work done and not have a pretty computer sitting on their desk. As for those outcry about anything Apple we call them PC users.

The reality is the cMP appealed to a larger number of people due to it's ability to do more. The cMP, had it been updated with the same level of technology as the nMP, could have done everything the nMP could do. The same cannot be said about the nMP.
 
how many of this 233 users actually own a MP ? I bet less than 50 .... maybe less than 20.
More pertinently. How many of the 233 users have ever actually bought a new MP? I qualify as I bought two 2008 Mac Pro 3,1s from Apple when my wife & I started doing professional video & photography. They have been upgraded with SSDs, 32GB 667MHz RAM (just upgraded one to 56GB) & GTX570s. We no longer do video professionally but they paid for themselves many times over & they are still going strong for what we want to do with them now so sadly I am not in the market for a new Mac Pro. If I would want to buy a new one with warranty from Apple rather than an upgraded used one with no warranty from a stranger on eBay.
 
Last edited:
I suspect the sales numbers are lower for the nMP than the cMP...at least with those who want to get work done and not have a pretty computer sitting on their desk. As for those outcry about anything Apple we call them PC users.

The reality is the cMP appealed to a larger number of people due to it's ability to do more. The cMP, had it been updated with the same level of technology as the nMP, could have done everything the nMP could do. The same cannot be said about the nMP.
your suspects are baseless, since the ONLY official statement about the MP 6,1 was from december 2013 when Apple said "the demands exceed expectations".
We don't know how many they sold since then.

More pertinently. How many of the 233 users have ever actually bought a new MP? I qualify as I bought two 2008 Mac Pro 3,1s from Apple when my wife & I started doing professional video & photography. They have been upgraded with SSDs, 32GB 667MHz RAM (just upgraded one to 56GB) & GTX570s. We no longer do video professionally but they paid for themselves many times over & they are still going strong for what we want to do with them now so sadly I am not in the market for a new Mac Pro. If I would want to buy a new one with warranty from Apple rather than an upgraded used one with no warranty form a stranger on eBay.
Agree. If you are looking for a professional machine you want a proper warranty (and AppleCare is a must).
 
  • Like
Reactions: thefredelement
In poking around a while back, I stumbled upon these guys...

http://www.macs4u.com/mac-pro-2-93-ghz-12-core-westmere-desktop-w-amd-radeon-hd5870/

I had no idea they were out there. Kind of strange to buy 6+ yr old systems with config options and warranties? But I did find it odd that they had no GPU options.

And yet it's outrageous to spend that much for a somewhat outdated systems that's several years old. But the option is there, apparently with a warranty.

If I would want to buy a new one with warranty from Apple rather than an upgraded used one with no warranty from a stranger on eBay.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.