You can change the home and back buttons. You can re-arrange them or add buttons......very nice!
Image
Yet another reason why soft keys rule.
Dynamic.
You can change the home and back buttons. You can re-arrange them or add buttons......very nice!
Image
LOL...i have never been a fan of soft keys but being able to customize thing helps. I am really impressed with this phone.....Yet another reason why soft keys rule.
Dynamic.
Yet another reason why soft keys rule.
Dynamic.
And obtrusive
If I remember correctly, the Nexus 4 soft keys make a 4.7" screen only 4.45".
I would much prefer to keep that screen real estate all the time and have capacitive buttons where the huge bottom bezel is. Otherwise there is no need for such a large bezel.
And don't even pull the typical "pie controls" argument. Pie controls are crap and don't even constitute as a reliable alternative.
As devices become more edge-to-edge, can't we just consider the soft keys as part of the bezel, so to speak? We're okay with capacitive buttons and physical buttons taking space in bezels, why can't we just consider the dedicated soft-key area the same way? Maybe the solution is what LG did with the G2; add a little extra screen space for the soft keys, allowing the "viewable" screen to still be a healthy 5" screen otherwise, while allowing the dynamics and benefits of soft keys.
What if, in your example, the Nexus 4 was a 4.45" screen with physical and/or capacitive buttons in the bezel? What's the difference?
As devices become more edge-to-edge, can't we just consider the soft keys as part of the bezel, so to speak? We're okay with capacitive buttons and physical buttons taking space in bezels, why can't we just consider the dedicated soft-key area the same way? Maybe the solution is what LG did with the G2; add a little extra screen space for the soft keys, allowing the "viewable" screen to still be a healthy 5" screen otherwise, while allowing the dynamics and benefits of soft keys.
What if, in your example, the Nexus 4 was a 4.45" screen with physical and/or capacitive buttons in the bezel? What's the difference?
Whipped this up just for you
It should explain it better. And yes I know I have bad handwriting.
Also with this ideal setup, landscape typing would be symmetrical as opposed to the current setup where your right thumb always has to extend out further than your left.
That's great but bottom bezels are still quite large. You look at the G2 - if the screen had extended to that bottom chunk, it would match with your above thinking. However, there's still bezel where capacitive keys could go (think GS4) and usable screen salvaged. Instead, we have soft buttons well above the bottom of the phone, and taking away screen real estate.
More of that logic applies to the Z1 than any other phone I can think of.
I get what both of you are saying. I guess I just don't see it as big of a deal since I prefer soft keys. I just take the screen space for what it is, and the soft key space for what they are: dedicated space for the soft keys. I mean, that's what it means to have "on-screen software" keys. It's not wasted space at all.
I also don't find typing in landscape that thrown off by mere centimeters of top-bottom bezel imbalance.
The thing about soft buttons is that they get hidden for applications that need the entire screen, like videos. So i don't really consider them wasted space.
So you'd prefer on screen buttons cutting into the screen as opposed to cutting into the bezel?
It's basically a choice between big bezels and smaller screen or smaller bezels and bigger screen. Personally, I'll take smaller bezels and bigger screen.
Videos are the only thing they auto hide for. Other apps can take advantage of them being hidden like Web browsing, gaming, and many others based on personal preference.
Not to mention having the buttons hide has to be implemented on a per app basis. Not every video watching app has that functionality. Hardly a good argument.
Is auto-hide soft buttons really that desirable? I'm genuinely curious.
Wouldn't it be an added step to going home, or switching apps, or more importantly, the back button? The back button is used so much.
I can't imagine adding an extra step to execute it is something we want ...
I can get it if it's an option to hide (maybe from the Quick Settings menu? There's plenty of space there to put another toggle), but to auto-hide every time it's not used?
I don't know...
Videos are the only thing they auto hide for. Other apps can take advantage of them being hidden like Web browsing, gaming, and many others based on personal preference.
Not to mention having the buttons hide has to be implemented on a per app basis. Not every video watching app has that functionality. Hardly a good argument.
How can on screen buttons cut into the bezel? A second screen?
Ok, you really didn't get it. Let me explain it again.I just don't see it as a big deal. We're talking about millimeters of a difference. In exchange for the benefits of dynamic soft keys that can change, have different action-able presses and/or gestures, have different information even.
In my experience with the GNex, the soft buttons were auto hidden in all video apps and all games i tried. I never felt they were obtrusive in any way.
So you are saying the buttons auto hide in all games you've played then say you accidentally hit a button?And I have accidently hit the back button a number of times while playing games, because of the smaller bezel.
The other alternative is the Cyanogenmod style Pie controls, which are great for people who want to do away with the soft buttons.
And don't even pull the typical "pie controls" argument. Pie controls are crap and don't even constitute as a reliable alternative.
So you are saying the buttons auto hide in all games you've played then say you accidentally hit a button?
Please list a single game where soft buttons are hidden.
Since you missed it
1.Please read my post again. There is reference to a GNex and and an S4.
2. All games that need landscape mode will hide the soft buttons. I'm sure you can find those games on the Play Store.
3. You're opinion on the Pie controls doesn't make them "crap". I used to use that a lot on my GNex and liked them.
Aren't devices that are going more edge to edge doing precisely what you're asking for? Making more room for the soft keys? Isn't the g2 ding exactly that? Adding extra screen to the bottom to accommodate the soft keys?
Trying to put the issue into numbers doesn't tell the whole story. Its like getting a new keyboard for you desktop. You have been using a specific one for so long, even the slightest change can cause many more typos. And in this sense with on screen buttons, having an asymmetrical keyboard can be even worse.Regarding your obsession for a centered landscape typing I can understand wanting this. I perosnally don't find it that off putting when it's marginally off centered. That's just me. We're once again talking about millimeters of a difference.
Would it matter if I was?It doesn't sound like you're against soft keys per se
Nobody has done it yet.but rather them take more bezel to do it. I'm in agreement then. And I think that's precisely what's happening as devices become more edge to edge.
Considering a majority of it is black space and screen area you won't get back to have larger keys for typing or a larger screen for playing games, yeah, its wasted.In the mean time,as I detailed in the rest of my post you didn't quote, I don't mind what they're doing nor consider .2 inches of space (a mere 5.08 millimeters!) for soft keys wasted.
Name a single game.
Pie controls are not an alternative. I have yet to meet a single person who uses pie controls as a 100% all the time alternative to on screen buttons. There is a reason for that.
The G2 has bigger bezels on the bottom than it does on the top. This is the exact opposite of what should be happening.
Trying to put the issue into numbers doesn't tell the whole story. Its like getting a new keyboard for you desktop. You have been using a specific one for so long, even the slightest change can cause many more typos. And in this sense with on screen buttons, having an asymmetrical keyboard can be even worse.
Would it matter if I was?
Nobody has done it yet.
Considering a majority of it is black space and screen area you won't get back to have larger keys for typing or a larger screen for playing games, yeah, its wasted.
great device with just two flaws:
1) plastic body
2) on-screen buttons
other than that this is a great device.
I don't consider those to be flaws either.I dont consider either of those to be flaws.
I don't consider those to be flaws either.
LG has done an outstanding job with the UI on the G2. It is very fast and seamless with no lag at all. The battery life is very impressive!
It has been off the charger for 33 hours and still has 55% battery life left!
I am impressed!
Image