By default, macOS runs the screen at a resolution of 3840x2160 (native resolution of the monitor) which looks like 1920x1080 at Retina quality. The result is screen elements that are nice and clear but a bit too big for my liking, so I opted for the next setting which is a resolution of 5120x2880 which looks like 2560x1440. With this setting, the screen elements are the "correct" size for a 27" monitor and still retain very near Retina quality. While technically not as clear as 2x Retina quality (although I'd argue most would be hard pressed to tell a difference), it is noticeably clearer than native 2560x1440 resolution.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Mac mini M1 compatible monitor list
- Thread starter pldelisle
- WikiPost WikiPost
- Start date
-
- Tags
- m1 mac m1 mac mini mac mini monitor
- Sort by reaction score
- Status
I find 2560 x 1440 to be too small on a 27”4k; I prefer 1920 x 1080 although desktop icons might be a tad large but I shrink them to 48x48 from 64 and it is perfect. And of course integer scaling is the best but fractional ones are still pretty good. I say use different resolutions depending on what you are working on.
Two monitor config, without problem and working perfect:
Dell UP2716D -> USB C to DP -> Startech Bidirectional DP to USB-C
Dell U2717D -> HDMI (No DDC/CI)
Dell UP2716D -> USB C to DP -> Startech Bidirectional DP to USB-C
Dell U2717D -> HDMI (No DDC/CI)
I'm using a LG 27UD69 display with a Belkin UltraHD High Speed 4K HDMI cable, and it all works perfectly.
Have any of you had success using an official Apple USB-C to HDMI adapter? I have an Anker one from Amazon that works fine for my PC laptop but with the Mac Mini M1 I experience the same issues with the HDMI port or USB-C. But $70 is a tough sell for something that is ~$15 on Amazon for a 3rd party adapter.
did your monitor suffer issue like flickering, burn in, or wrong color after sleep on M1 Mini? what cable you use?
thanks.
Anyone have experience with the Dell S3221QS (assuming similar perf to the posted S3219Q)? Bought it and a Cables Matter DP-USBC cable, hoping it all works out with a new M1 Mac Mini.
Rtings says "bad! no!" but I'm hoping that has changed in 6 months, with Monterey and firmware updates. Otherwise, I'll probably just grab a Gigabyte M32U - it's going on an Ergotron arm anyway.
Rtings says "bad! no!" but I'm hoping that has changed in 6 months, with Monterey and firmware updates. Otherwise, I'll probably just grab a Gigabyte M32U - it's going on an Ergotron arm anyway.
Ian - ifarlow - I find it so disconcerting that there is so much conflicting info about which monitors work or don't work with the M1 Mac Mini - I'm trying to decide between the ASUS ProArt PA279CV 4K (£477) and the PA278QV (£319) wondering if the extra £158 is worth it for use mainly with Logic Pro X - I'm not gaming/doing video or photography - I just want more windows visible without going to huge screen) so the PA279CV 4K appeals simply because of the 4K - not because of anything to do with colour accuracy, or anything photographic. How do you actually connect the M1 - which output port on the M1 goes to which input port on the monitor? Did you use a cable that came with the monitor?
Choosing a monitor that works with the M1 Mac Mini just feels like a minefield to me - there is so much conflicting info.
Choosing a monitor that works with the M1 Mac Mini just feels like a minefield to me - there is so much conflicting info.
Asus Proart PA279CV
4K 3840x2160p 100% sRGB
HDR600 Vesa Certification.
Have been using it since July 2021 on my Mac Mini M1.
It works flawlessly once the system boots, howewer on apple silicon it sometimes have a pink flash when it's connected via USB C; after that the screen performs with no glitches
4K 3840x2160p 100% sRGB
HDR600 Vesa Certification.
Have been using it since July 2021 on my Mac Mini M1.
It works flawlessly once the system boots, howewer on apple silicon it sometimes have a pink flash when it's connected via USB C; after that the screen performs with no glitches
The PA279CV and the PA278QV are very similar monitors with very similar specs. The biggest difference that I see is:
- The PA279CV has USB-C where the PA278QV does not.
- The PA279CV has newer standards (HDMI 2 and USB 3.1) where the PA278QV has slightly older standards (HDMI 1.4 and USB 3).
- The PA279CV has a resolution of 3840x2160 with a pitch of 0.155mm where the PA278QV has a resolution of 2560x1440 with a pitch of 0.233mm.
So, my suggestion would be to spend the extra on the PA279CV. It's a better monitor and one that should last for many years.
Hi, i using Type C to Type C as i mentioned already.
and for now i not suffer from any issue. maybe it's because my mac mini configured not to sleep.
I'm thinking buy the mini m1 due my macbook pro is dead and I'm sick to dealing with batteries and other things related with laptops, so I'm thinking on one of this two 27 LG.
LG 27UN850-W or LG-27UP850-W https://www.lg.com/us/compare?bizType=B2C&modelId=MD07516743:MD08000010
forums.macrumors.com
UK = 2018 model, DisplayPort 1.2, HDR10
UL = 2019 model, DisplayPort 1.4, HDR400, USB-C
UN = 2020 model, DisplayPort 1.4, HDR400, USB-C
UP = 2021 Delivers up to 96W on USB-C while all previous only ~60W
but first I'm going to read this thread.
A interesting comment that I found online on the UP over others:
This one has DCI-P3 color space. Older ones only had sRGB. DCI-P3 color space is better for content creation, of images that will be seen on other monitors and devices. Working on an sRGB monitor will produce images that look over-saturated on other screens. Working in an Adobe RGB monitor will produce images that look under-saturated on other screens. But working on a DCI-P3 monitor will produce images that look balanced and correct on all other monitors and devices. So your work as a content creator is not wasted. as example: sRGB monitor makes skin tones look like a lobster on other screens. Adobe RGB display makes them look dead on other screens. DCI-P3 monitor produces the best color possible on other screens. This applies to all colors and scenes. The price seems very low. I hope it's not bad quality. Monitors are not created equal. I guess the only way to know is to try it. The 27UN850 is absolutely beautiful. But it is limited by sRGB. As a digital painter, I wish companies would create more native DCI-P3 monitors, of very high quality. They're rare to find. All the ones I've tested have serious problems - like polluted colors - not pure colors, wrong grayscale, wrong exaggerated gamma.. I have yet to find a professional quality, balanced, 4k DCI-P3 monitor. This would fit a great market. But few monitors exist.. most are poor quality.
LG 27UN850-W or LG-27UP850-W https://www.lg.com/us/compare?bizType=B2C&modelId=MD07516743:MD08000010
LG Monitor 27UK850-W vs 27UL850-W vs 27UN850-W differences?
what are the differences between this 3 models, looks the same: LG Monitor 27UK850-W vs 27UL850-W vs 27UN850-W the order is based on date
forums.macrumors.com
UK = 2018 model, DisplayPort 1.2, HDR10
UL = 2019 model, DisplayPort 1.4, HDR400, USB-C
UN = 2020 model, DisplayPort 1.4, HDR400, USB-C
UP = 2021 Delivers up to 96W on USB-C while all previous only ~60W
but first I'm going to read this thread.
A interesting comment that I found online on the UP over others:
This one has DCI-P3 color space. Older ones only had sRGB. DCI-P3 color space is better for content creation, of images that will be seen on other monitors and devices. Working on an sRGB monitor will produce images that look over-saturated on other screens. Working in an Adobe RGB monitor will produce images that look under-saturated on other screens. But working on a DCI-P3 monitor will produce images that look balanced and correct on all other monitors and devices. So your work as a content creator is not wasted. as example: sRGB monitor makes skin tones look like a lobster on other screens. Adobe RGB display makes them look dead on other screens. DCI-P3 monitor produces the best color possible on other screens. This applies to all colors and scenes. The price seems very low. I hope it's not bad quality. Monitors are not created equal. I guess the only way to know is to try it. The 27UN850 is absolutely beautiful. But it is limited by sRGB. As a digital painter, I wish companies would create more native DCI-P3 monitors, of very high quality. They're rare to find. All the ones I've tested have serious problems - like polluted colors - not pure colors, wrong grayscale, wrong exaggerated gamma.. I have yet to find a professional quality, balanced, 4k DCI-P3 monitor. This would fit a great market. But few monitors exist.. most are poor quality.
Last edited:
"I have a cheap Dell monitor , will it work with Mac mini?
It has both HDMI and VGA ports.
Either one should be usable with the correct cable.
You didn't tell us WHICH Mini you have. Always mention this in your posts, because which Mini you have can determine which connection ports are available.
I would try HDMI first.
If you already have an HDMI cable, try that.
If that cable gives you problems, then I'd suggest a "High Speed HDMI 2.0" cable.
If THAT doesn't work, I'd suggest a USBc (Mini end) to HDMI cable/adapter.
And if even that doesn't work, try USBc (Mini) to the VGA port (display).
Dell SE2219H Full HD"
It has both HDMI and VGA ports.
Either one should be usable with the correct cable.
You didn't tell us WHICH Mini you have. Always mention this in your posts, because which Mini you have can determine which connection ports are available.
I would try HDMI first.
If you already have an HDMI cable, try that.
If that cable gives you problems, then I'd suggest a "High Speed HDMI 2.0" cable.
If THAT doesn't work, I'd suggest a USBc (Mini end) to HDMI cable/adapter.
And if even that doesn't work, try USBc (Mini) to the VGA port (display).
I'm eyeing the 2020 one... I have now a MacBook Pro 2017 which I connect to my Dell monitor with no issues with HDMI cable
Apple Mac mini M1 with Samsung SyncMaster S24B300
24" monitor, HDMI to HDMI Kabel
S24B300:
Resolutie:1920 x 1080 (1080p FHD - Full High Definition)
Ziet eruit als:1920 x 1080 @ 60.00Hz
Hoofdbeeldscherm: Ja
Synchrone weergave: Uit
Online: Ja
Rotatie: Ondersteund
Pas helderheid automatisch aan: Ja
24" monitor, HDMI to HDMI Kabel
S24B300:
Resolutie:1920 x 1080 (1080p FHD - Full High Definition)
Ziet eruit als:1920 x 1080 @ 60.00Hz
Hoofdbeeldscherm: Ja
Synchrone weergave: Uit
Online: Ja
Rotatie: Ondersteund
Pas helderheid automatisch aan: Ja