... Going to exactly the three year anniversary and then saying going to take even longer than 3 years is 'face saving' how? ...
To be fair, most place the beginning of the countdown at the release of the first ASi Macs, so November of 2020...?
In June WWDC 2020 Apple said "about 2 years". The transition started then because the transition kit was announced and shipped shortly after that. However, even if extensively hand wave that clock didn't start until Nov 2020, then Sept-Nov 2023 would be 'about 3 years". it is still a year past the broad window they gave themselves.
So issue still stands... going to WWDC to ask for around 3 years of time makes Apple look good how?
Essentially the only way to miss the "took you about three years" label is to ship before WWDC 2023. I actually do think Apple intended to give themselves to the end of 2022 to finish off the transition. But they have
blown past that deadline at this point. If all they have is more 'promises' for an even further deadline extension at WWDC 2023 then just excuse peddling. WWDC is the wrong forum for excuse peddling.
In fact, not particularly any better than the 1 year late Xeon SP gen 4 / W-3400/2400 (sapphire rapids) Intel just rolled out. Intel is loosing enterprise customers being flakey. Same thing will happen for Apple.
If there is some odd-ball reason that is reasonably justifiable to say "going to ship Oct-Nov 2023" then a 6 month window before that is April-May; not June. Apple gets 'grilled' in the press for 3-6 weeks and then new info at WWDC 'washes' the headlines clean with new stuff.
Also worse if going to 'promise' Ar/VR headset for 5-6 months down the road. How much creditability going to have when in the
SAME dog-and-pony session are highlighting that one of your previous roadmap timelines was hugely
blown. "Believe us we were seriously wrong on product A but product B is going to roll out on time".
In contrast, If Apple did a April/May reveal and at June WWDC said these are the updates we have done over last 1-2 months that makes that "Mac Pro" date more believable, then they might have some chance to build creditability , rather than blow up credibility.
I wish they would, my 2.1 THX (yeah, yeah, barebones THX, more label than anything...) Logitech system can use a "regular" 3.5mm audio feed, but it also has an Optical input which I would rather use (as I am now with my ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Impact mDTX mobo...); I would like to see a return to the combined 3.5mm & Optical port...
That combined 3.5mm & digital port is relatively non standard. It is likely not coming back. Apple hasn't had digital out for more than several years. USB modules and HDMI/DP to digital out modules are plentiful. ( it isn't like stuck with USB 2.0 tech for the USB modules anymore. )