Multimedia said:Sure they will cost more. But if you need 8 cores, you might need 16. So what's the big hub-bub Bub?
Get in line Satzzz. You're behind me. I've been in the Clovertown queue since about a week after I got my G5 Quad in February. I am writing this on my PowerBook because my Quad is busy crushing video and there is still a queue for more crushing after one of the three copies of Handbrake finishes. If I start the 4th copy now, it will slow down the other three such that inefficiency of speed Vs. Core Capacity is overrun by TOO FEW CORES to run Handbrake as fast as it wants to - up to 2.5 Cores. the three that are running are using about 1.25 cores each. And that's just for yesterday's off-air recordings. NK
Trading off Time Vs. Capacity with only 4 cores is a real pain in the ass Satzzz. My money is definitely on the Dual Clovertown in January - PLUS I may grab another G5 Quad soon as they are very CHEAP for the mean time.
Mac Pro Quad? No help. And VERY Expensive RAM. The problem is a CORE SHORTAGE not a speed deficiency. G5 Quad is only about 15% "slower" than Mac pro with RAM that cost $70/GB IE perceptibly about the same speed. You do the math. Until I can get a Mac with at least 8 Cores I have a bottleneck problem that won't quit.
Keep your powder dry Satzzz. We're gonna get with 8 cores for under $4k in January. It will be worth the wait in GOLD saved now.
I ordered a Mac Pro because it kicks ass and I can boot into Windoze for gaming if I feel like it It would seem that if you believe you could benfity from multiple cores so much you could just use more than one machine with distributed computing. I also highly doubt the 4 core processors are as close as you guys think nor wil the be as cheap as everyone thinks. We'll see though I don't my life on hold for what could be, I bought my rev a G5 and never looked back. I'll do the same with the Mac Pro