Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.
xx.png

After updating to the latest Officialdrivers, I suppose that the Macmini mid 2010 (Macmini4,1) chipset is Nvidia, not Intel, so I cannot apply the APFS ROM patch to it. Is there an NVIDIA version?
 
Last edited:
After updating to the latest Officialdrivers, I suppose that the Macmini mid 2010 (Macmini4,1) chipset is Nvidia, not Intel, so I cannot apply the APFS ROM patch to it. Is there an NVIDIA version?

Any Mac produced from 2010 (and probably "late 2009" too) don't need the APFS ROM patch, since they are natively supported till 10.13.x and so embed the APFS bootloader firmware.
[doublepost=1562575947][/doublepost]
I have one of those. Full metal GPU.

Ok, but you have that AMD 7950 GPU on a 2010 machine, since many reported that MP3,1 2008 cpu lacks the SSE4.2 then a MTLDriver patch is required I guess.
 
When I have macbook upgraded with newer wireless card will new catalina patcher that install patches automatically recognize different HW than base model has and install needed patches?
I have both MBP 4,1 and MBA 3,2 upgraded with never generation cards.
Thanks
 
  • Like
Reactions: TimothyR734
It´s a B-E-T-A

I would imagine that is why jasoncarle put “for now”.

I’m holding off updating for several different reasons, but it’s interesting to keep up with the achievements being made to get Catalina usable for all us “unsupported” and I can understand why so many want to try it out, even if they do ultimately revert back to Mojave.
 
Catalina on mbp 5,5...runs on new ssd but from usb..so little slow.
second boot today runs smooth and lil faster
constant 70-75 c !!
everything works fine except
photos,siri pops up and goes.
Auto appearance..no
maps, stocks,face time, messages,safari,app store,icloud work very well.
I will post more later.
DOSDUDE1!!! Greatefull!!!!Screenshot 2019-07-08 at 14.45.27.pngScreenshot 2019-07-08 at 14.45.27.pngScreenshot 2019-07-08 at 14.38.35.png
 
yes the icons can ow be changed, but i want it recognised by my mac as internal
its an OCD thing, don't know why its classed as external
All my PCIe drives (Mercury Accelsior, SSUBX, SSUAX, Hyper X) in several machines and macOS (10.13 and 10.14) are shown as external drives. They’re SATA and AHCI and not NVME but I think they’re all recognized as external because of the PCIe adaption.
 
i have 2 drives for catalina, both seem the same? any reason for this?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-07-08 at 8.47.42 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2019-07-08 at 8.47.42 AM.png
    38.4 KB · Views: 166
  • Like
Reactions: TimothyR734
All my PCIe drives (Mercury Accelsior, SSUBX, SSUAX, Hyper X) in several machines and macOS (10.13 and 10.14) are shown as external drives. They’re SATA and AHCI and not NVME but I think they’re all recognized as external because of the PCIe adaption.
It ridiculous they are inside the Mac ergo internal
 
  • Like
Reactions: TimothyR734
It ridiculous they are inside the Mac ergo internal
I see what you mean but I think, and I’m just guessing here, originally PCIe extension was supposed to provide connectivity for external peripherals.
When flash drives became more popular and therefore smaller, people just decided to mount them directly onto the cards. It’s still the same architecture. Apple never released a cMP with an internal flash drive outside the drive bays.

Edit: forgot about the raid card option, but I guess that was supposed to be used with spinners.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TimothyR734
i have 2 drives for catalina, both seem the same? any reason for this?
Data stores your home folder and installed apps.
The one labelled just Catalina is your system.
It's new.
[doublepost=1562606656][/doublepost]
It ridiculous they are inside the Mac ergo internal
My drives when connected to a SATA III PCIe card, always show external. It doesn't bother me.
 
Last edited:
I installed macOS Catalina on a separate partition on my MacBook Pro 8,1, and most things seem to work fine for my day to day use, but there is one pretty annoying issue.

For some reason applications don't seem to open up to the correct size, and the vertical resizing of windows doesn't work properly so I can't manually fix the issue aside from entering fullscreen mode.

As a result, the main menu of system preferences is broken, and I have to use the search bar, and error dialogues have cut off text.

The screenshot I included shows what the windows tend to look like as they open. It seems like some display scaling issue, but I'm not too well versed in what might be causing it.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-07-07 at 12.42.36 pm.png
    Screen Shot 2019-07-07 at 12.42.36 pm.png
    1.6 MB · Views: 187
nice setup. fully loaded here too but never got around to swapping my original superdrive out. runs like a champ, but those old XEONs are really power hungry and showing their age. sad to say but my largest compiles are easily 3x to 4x faster on a 2018 mbp, hands down - no contest. so relegated to being an external server or testing new unsupported os releases (have metal support with the 680)
I’m still happy with mine. for liOS dev. I consider normal speeds. My 27 iMac is gonna be my macVM box. It is on High Sierra and it can use Catalina in a Vm, It’s gonna l several different OS’ for testing CloneTool. Beefing its RAM from 4 to 32go.

I am going with 64GB RAM on my 3,1. I hope to get it to run QEMU on Mac VMs since Anka Bulld can’t run a VM on it yet.

Any anyone tried putting in a newer CPU inside a Mac Pro 3,1 that is not based on the Core2Duo Processor. Something newer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TimothyR734
Catalina on mbp 5,5...runs on new ssd but from usb..so little slow.
second boot today runs smooth and lil faster
constant 70-75 c !!
everything works fine except
photos,siri pops up and goes.
Auto appearance..no
maps, stocks,face time, messages,safari,app store,icloud work very well.
I will post more later.
DOSDUDE1!!! Greatefull!!!!View attachment 847224View attachment 847224View attachment 847225

Did you previously ran APFS ROM Patch on your model? Reason I asked is that I have the same model, albeit the 15" model (MBP5,3) and I did not attempt to run the APFS ROM Patch due to warnings it might brick my device. I'm waiting for @dosdude1's APFS Patch to include on the next version of his macOS Catalina Patcher app.

So I'm just curious of you did do so. Appreciate a response.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TimothyR734
It ridiculous they are inside the Mac ergo internal
This behaviour has a reason. Mac Pro firmware have to separate what is internal and external based on two things:

  • Anything where hot-swap and hot plug is a possibility, like anything connected via PCIe slots,
  • SATA drives connected on the ICH10, the south bridge, native SATA ports where hot-plug and hot-swap is not possible.
PCIe drives, including SATA/SAS drives connected to additional SATA/SAS controllers, AHCI PCIe drives, SAS PCIe drives and NVMe drives are all external to the firmware because Mac Pro can eject them when not the boot drive. That's why they're external even if it's installed internally to the case. This is immutable from the firmware perspective, but you can hack the system and fool macOS with apps like Innie.
 
I’m still happy with mine. for liOS dev. I consider normal speeds. My 27 iMac is gonna be my macVM box. It is on High Sierra and it can use Catalina in a Vm, It’s gonna l several different OS’ for testing CloneTool. Beefing its RAM from 4 to 32go.

I am going with 64GB RAM on my 3,1. I hope to get it to run QEMU on Mac VMs since Anka Bulld can’t run a VM on it yet.

Any anyone tried putting in a newer CPU inside a Mac Pro 3,1 that is not based on the Core2Duo Processor. Something newer?

The motherboard limits you as to the CPU upgrade options.

https://blog.greggant.com/posts/2018/05/07/definitive-mac-pro-upgrade-guide.html#cpuupgrades
 
I found an interesting Article that allows VT-X to be enabled on Mac Pro 3,1 2008s. It appears to only turn it on in Ubuntu Linux and it needs to be run each time. This enables KVM on Linux for this box.

https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Enable_VT-X_on_Mac_Pro_(Early_2008)

I might have to toy with Ubuntu sometime. I am interested QEMU and haven't had much luck with it on the Mac side with the 3,1. Ubuntu can also run Swift / server side.

Wonder if there is a way to turn VT-X permanently or turn it on via the Mac, which would enable KVM on Mac.
 
I found an interesting Article that allows VT-X to be enabled on Mac Pro 3,1 2008s. It appears to only turn it on in Ubuntu Linux and it needs to be run each time. This enables KVM on Linux for this box.

https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Enable_VT-X_on_Mac_Pro_(Early_2008)

I might have to toy with Ubuntu sometime. I am interested QEMU and haven't had much luck with it on the Mac side with the 3,1. Ubuntu can also run Swift / server side.

Wonder if there is a way to turn VT-X permanently or turn it on via the Mac, which would enable KVM on Mac.
VT-x is enabled by default on any Mac with a CPU that supports it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.