I decided that Catalina Beta was a bug too far for me right now and went back to Mojave. It's been fun gentlemen.
After updating to the latest Officialdrivers, I suppose that the Macmini mid 2010 (Macmini4,1) chipset is Nvidia, not Intel, so I cannot apply the APFS ROM patch to it. Is there an NVIDIA version?
I have one of those. Full metal GPU.
I hear you. lol - you can buy a small car for the price of a basic MP2019...not exactly the response enthusiasts were waiting for. If anything it will push many more to the hackintosh realm.
![]()
After updating to the latest Officialdrivers, I suppose that the Macmini mid 2010 (Macmini4,1) chipset is Nvidia, not Intel, so I cannot apply the APFS ROM patch to it. Is there an NVIDIA version?
It´s a B-E-T-AI decided that Catalina Beta was a bug too far for me right now and went back to Mojave. It's been fun gentlemen.
That´s right. And even better from an USB.You should install High Sierra instead which will get you the official Apple APFS support via their firmware updates.
It´s a B-E-T-A
yes the icons can ow be changed, but i want it recognised by my mac as internalIf you're just looking for the optics, changing the HD icon now works again in beta 3.
All my PCIe drives (Mercury Accelsior, SSUBX, SSUAX, Hyper X) in several machines and macOS (10.13 and 10.14) are shown as external drives. They’re SATA and AHCI and not NVME but I think they’re all recognized as external because of the PCIe adaption.yes the icons can ow be changed, but i want it recognised by my mac as internal
its an OCD thing, don't know why its classed as external
It´s a B-E-T-A
It ridiculous they are inside the Mac ergo internalAll my PCIe drives (Mercury Accelsior, SSUBX, SSUAX, Hyper X) in several machines and macOS (10.13 and 10.14) are shown as external drives. They’re SATA and AHCI and not NVME but I think they’re all recognized as external because of the PCIe adaption.
Part of the new APFS in Cati have 2 drives for catalina, both seem the same? any reason for this?
I see what you mean but I think, and I’m just guessing here, originally PCIe extension was supposed to provide connectivity for external peripherals.It ridiculous they are inside the Mac ergo internal
Data stores your home folder and installed apps.i have 2 drives for catalina, both seem the same? any reason for this?
My drives when connected to a SATA III PCIe card, always show external. It doesn't bother me.It ridiculous they are inside the Mac ergo internal
I’m still happy with mine. for liOS dev. I consider normal speeds. My 27 iMac is gonna be my macVM box. It is on High Sierra and it can use Catalina in a Vm, It’s gonna l several different OS’ for testing CloneTool. Beefing its RAM from 4 to 32go.nice setup. fully loaded here too but never got around to swapping my original superdrive out. runs like a champ, but those old XEONs are really power hungry and showing their age. sad to say but my largest compiles are easily 3x to 4x faster on a 2018 mbp, hands down - no contest. so relegated to being an external server or testing new unsupported os releases (have metal support with the 680)
Catalina on mbp 5,5...runs on new ssd but from usb..so little slow.
second boot today runs smooth and lil faster
constant 70-75 c !!
everything works fine except
photos,siri pops up and goes.
Auto appearance..no
maps, stocks,face time, messages,safari,app store,icloud work very well.
I will post more later.
DOSDUDE1!!! Greatefull!!!!View attachment 847224View attachment 847224View attachment 847225
This behaviour has a reason. Mac Pro firmware have to separate what is internal and external based on two things:It ridiculous they are inside the Mac ergo internal
I’m still happy with mine. for liOS dev. I consider normal speeds. My 27 iMac is gonna be my macVM box. It is on High Sierra and it can use Catalina in a Vm, It’s gonna l several different OS’ for testing CloneTool. Beefing its RAM from 4 to 32go.
I am going with 64GB RAM on my 3,1. I hope to get it to run QEMU on Mac VMs since Anka Bulld can’t run a VM on it yet.
Any anyone tried putting in a newer CPU inside a Mac Pro 3,1 that is not based on the Core2Duo Processor. Something newer?
I gotcha. Thanks.The motherboard limits you as to the CPU upgrade options.
https://blog.greggant.com/posts/2018/05/07/definitive-mac-pro-upgrade-guide.html#cpuupgrades
VT-x is enabled by default on any Mac with a CPU that supports it.I found an interesting Article that allows VT-X to be enabled on Mac Pro 3,1 2008s. It appears to only turn it on in Ubuntu Linux and it needs to be run each time. This enables KVM on Linux for this box.
https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Enable_VT-X_on_Mac_Pro_(Early_2008)
I might have to toy with Ubuntu sometime. I am interested QEMU and haven't had much luck with it on the Mac side with the 3,1. Ubuntu can also run Swift / server side.
Wonder if there is a way to turn VT-X permanently or turn it on via the Mac, which would enable KVM on Mac.