I was mostly referring to the changes in the update mechanism in Ventura - that installation will finish quicker once the machine reboots, unlike waiting 20+ minutes as it is now.IDK, maybe I'm a Mac traditionalist, but what was wrong with the full installer? I can't imagine the full installer causing more problems than a "delta" installer, especially if it's a whole OS upgrade. If anything, a delta installer might cause more issues than a full installer, especially if the preexisting OS had odd bugs or missing system files, or whatnot. I personally feel more comforted by having a full installer so the whole installation/upgrade feels "fresh" and finished, if that makes sense. My two cents, but maybe I'm missing something?
I also prefer to have full installer and I am sure that this option will still be there via the App Store, so whoever wants can benefit from it. However, the delta should be more than enough for a the typical user, furthermore, seeing a smaller update size and it acting more like a minor rather than a major update, it might be incentive for more people to update without the fear or complexity that might come with the full installer.