Pour one out for the icon designers who made all of the 3D System Preferences icons for the Big Sur redesign. I agree there are some drawbacks to this change, but I do think parity makes sense in this area across devices.
It still looks like a mess to me; the left panel is not in alphabetical order and you still need to "hunt and peck" for the item you want, just like you had to with the old version. Every time I go in there it takes me 10-15 seconds to find the right icon, and I don't think this new one is going to change that.System preferences is a cluttered mess and hasn't changed aside from its frame. This is far more intuitive and easier to find things.
Design wise this is a step back. For a landscape display the current control panel displays all the icons to the sub windows. This new layout is more appropriate for a portrait display like an iPad or iPhone. In a landscape display you will have to scroll to see the entire menu. It is like in finder selecting to display icons vs the detail list.
I really wish these types of updated or new layouts would be introduced as an option. Let the market decide if the new layout is preferable. I hope this goes the way of last year’s safari layout update. I find it much harder to change a particular setting on my iPhone vs Mac.
You mean the dynamic wallpapers which are above the dark/light and regular ones?And is it just me, or are they fazing out the dynamic desktop wallpapers in favor of simple dark/light options?
That very thought scares me. The good thing is I'm confident you are wrong.apple is slowly making MacOS more comfortable for touch screen don't know when but I hope one day MacOS and iPadOS becomes one
Yeah. They didn’t add one this year.You mean the dynamic wallpapers which are above the dark/light and regular ones?
It's creating consistency across devices, and makes it easier for people on iOS to go to macOS for the first time and not feel completely lost. It's a really good idea, and I'm glad they're doing it.Once again. MacOS looking more and more like IOS.
I bet any amount of money when they start using touch screen Macs that macOS and IOS will merge into one.
Because it gives you a cluttered list as opposed to a grid with separation between icons. I was mostly joking with my comment, but there’s a reason this is the design that has been on all their touch devices for years.Why would this new design be harder to use with a mouse? It appears we may now be able to now navigate with keystrokes (or a mouse), so that's a plus.
I assume the final version will be called Settings. The only reason to keep “System” would be for people who are used to typing S Y S T Enter in spotlight to quickly open system preferences.Why not just name it 'Settings' to maintain consistency across iOS and macOS? Its obvious both are converging.
Or it could be that on iOS, it's easy to "assume" that the Setting app covers system apps/settings, as well as app settings. On the Mac, if someone saw "Settings", they might assume it's for all Mac apps (including third party). Titling it to "System Settings" makes it clear that it's for, well, system settings only.I assume the final version will be called Settings. The only reason to keep “System” would be for people who are used to typing S Y S T Enter in spotlight to quickly open system preferences.
Agreed. In a sense, this was just a reskin of the same menus.It still looks like a mess to me; the left panel is not in alphabetical order and you still need to "hunt and peck" for the item you want, just like you had to with the old version. Every time I go in there it takes me 10-15 seconds to find the right icon, and I don't think this new one is going to change that.
Apparently the information that was previously in About This Mac, eg. the storage overview, is now in System Settings. Why? The amount of free space isn't a setting at all!Or it could be that on iOS, it's easy to "assume" that the Setting app covers system apps/settings, as well as app settings. On the Mac, if someone saw "Settings", they might assume it's for all Mac apps (including third party). Titling it to "System Settings" makes it clear that it's for, well, system settings only.
That was probably to make it in parity with iOS.Apparently the information that was previously in About This Mac, eg. the storage overview, is now in System Settings. Why? The amount of free space isn't a setting at all!
That's a fair point.Or it could be that on iOS, it's easy to "assume" that the Setting app covers system apps/settings, as well as app settings. On the Mac, if someone saw "Settings", they might assume it's for all Mac apps (including third party). Titling it to "System Settings" makes it clear that it's for, well, system settings only.
Well, you can see where it's all heading and what the "end goal" is. The question is, how many years will it take to get there?apple is slowly making MacOS more comfortable for touch screen don't know when but I hope one day MacOS and iPadOS becomes one