Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.
I did a clean install of Big Sur (with OCLP) then took a separate SSD, started a UEFI Windows 10 install in another computer, when it went to reboot for the first time, I shut it down, put it in my 5,1 and completed the install. This seemed to be the easiest way to get 10 installed. I have 11 on a few machines, but I still prefer 10, so don't mind not having 11 on this machine.

I've since upgraded the Big Sur install to Monterey, no issues to report on that front. Both show up properly in the OpenCore boot selector and I just switch back and forth.
I don't have another PC to plug into, looking more into it is 10 i believe on the usb. I just remember something off when I dl it from the site not matching the tutorial. Anywho bootcamp doesn't work here and I don't have another drive to spare atm. I have 5 drives plugged in including the pcie drive which I wanted to partition half of it using apfs since apfs is supposedly shares media between the two drives in bootcamp. however "This Mac does not support Boot Camp."
 
I don't have another PC to plug into, looking more into it is 10 i believe on the usb. I just remember something off when I dl it from the site not matching the tutorial. Anywho bootcamp doesn't work here and I don't have another drive to spare atm. I have 5 drives plugged in including the pcie drive which I wanted to partition half of it using apfs since apfs is supposedly shares media between the two drives in bootcamp. however "This Mac does not support Boot Camp."
The problem you'll run into if you try and install 10 (and I assume 11) directly through OpenCore is that it will fail, it can't write to the drive. I know, because I tried that first, lol. Some quick searching showed guys extracting the Windows 10 installer to an exFAT partition (which you can do on your same drive) and others were starting it in VirtualBox and then booting that install directly.

Since I had a UEFI PC sitting behind me, I just decided to try starting the install on that first, which was a much quicker process, and allowed me to use my existing Windows 10 USB stick.

For you, the VirtualBox setup should work to get you a working UEFI install of 10 or 11, provided you are booting OpenCore, but that's unclear, given that you said you are using Mojave, and that's natively supported.
 
The problem you'll run into if you try and install 10 (and I assume 11) directly through OpenCore is that it will fail, it can't write to the drive. I know, because I tried that first, lol. Some quick searching showed guys extracting the Windows 10 installer to an exFAT partition (which you can do on your same drive) and others were starting it in VirtualBox and then booting that install directly.

Since I had a UEFI PC sitting behind me, I just decided to try starting the install on that first, which was a much quicker process, and allowed me to use my existing Windows 10 USB stick.

For you, the VirtualBox setup should work to get you a working UEFI install of 10 or 11, provided you are booting OpenCore, but that's unclear, given that you said you are using Mojave, and that's natively supported.
- 0xe00002e2 error after nvrest and blessing it again. Was going to install on partition, already did a expat, and tried to option in to the usb drive i had windows installer on. black screen. nvram reset now i can't load open core. **** this unstable garbage.
 
Last edited:
  • Sad
Reactions: PeterHolbrook
I found Big Sur to be noticeably slower than Mojave (I never ran Catalina, since it wouldn't natively install so I just ran Mojave until I finally decided to use OCLP and do a fresh install of Big Sur), but I find Monterey faster than Big Sur, so...

What are you using for a video card?
I finally bit the bullet and upgraded my main 5,1 to bigsur 11.6.4. I have been testing OC.76 and bigsur in my spare for a couple of months but my main machine has been running dosdude catalina for over a year. So far no complaints, I moved the OC drive across and upgraded the OC to .77 then ran the bigsur installers over my old drive and removed any files that might be a problem manually. Seemed a little slow initially while doing its update things but its all caught up now

I will start the Monterey testing soon, but overall i'm happy with big sur. I think the cutsey iphone style graphics in the interface waste a bit of graphical computer power , if i'm not mistaken
BTW 7SAUM/6LAP here :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: OVERKILL338LM
I found Big Sur to be noticeably slower than Mojave (I never ran Catalina, since it wouldn't natively install so I just ran Mojave until I finally decided to use OCLP and do a fresh install of Big Sur), but I find Monterey faster than Big Sur, so...

What are you using for a video card?
Hi overkill338LM, thanks for replying. I'm still on High Sierra and have tested a Sapphire Radeon Nitro+ RX 5700XT. Which I have finally flashed with EFI MAC. I decided to flash because of an issue I've already raised in OC threads, (I used Martin's OC exactly as explained), but I didn't get a completely clear answer. My question is focused on saying what operating system to install, so as not to have to suffer the damn Warning "incompatible Disk" This Disk uses fractures that are not supported on this version of macOS. You tell me that Catalina will not run natively. Do you know what this is due to? You mean that Big Sur and Monterey will run natively. I am very grateful for your attention.
Greetings.
Jose Antonio.
 
Update on my upgrade to Monterey the other day from Big Sur.

I'm feeling the same sluggishness with graphical tasks as I did with Big Sur (GTX680). It was blazing fast under Mojave, I didn't run Catalina, so don't know how that compares.

I realize that this NVidia card is now old and not officially supported on Monterey, but it was on Big Sur and this seems to be the same issue. I could play Borderlands 2 flawlessly on Mojave for example, but it's extremely laggy on Big Sur, I haven't tried it on Monterey, but I suspect the same performance, based on how the system is performing. Everything flies in Windows.

Does anybody know where the graphics driver being used for the NVidia cards is coming from that is being used in OCLP for Monterey? Is it the same one from Big Sur? The only thing that causes me to take pause on that assumption is that both my displays worked right out of the box once the OCLP patcher was run, whereas I didn't have both displays without a funky workaround (boot with HDMI unplugged, plug it back in after login) under Big Sur. It of course worked perfectly in Mojave, so wondering if it might be the Catalina one?

Now is not a great time to be buying a graphics card, so I'd like to continue to use this one for the time being until sanity is returned to that market.
I've been upgrading using OC through all OS and I am on Monterey 12.2.1. I haven't noticed graphics sluggishness. I use the 5,1 for work and personal activities but don't using it for gaming and such. Using apps like GIMP and some work-related programs that may be graphics light dependent have no problems. The only issues I have is slow boot since BS (from threads due to Samsung NVME 970 EVO SSD) but can live with that as apparent fix is to reformat and clean install, also I have noticed of late that disk access activities like saving a file from within an app are sluggish to display finder window. Not sure yet but may be mostly related to MS Office apps. I have been assuming this is also related to SSD but again not that problematic.

My set up is in my signature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OVERKILL338LM
Hi overkill338LM, thanks for replying. I'm still on High Sierra and have tested a Sapphire Radeon Nitro+ RX 5700XT. Which I have finally flashed with EFI MAC. I decided to flash because of an issue I've already raised in OC threads, (I used Martin's OC exactly as explained), but I didn't get a completely clear answer. My question is focused on saying what operating system to install, so as not to have to suffer the damn Warning "incompatible Disk" This Disk uses fractures that are not supported on this version of macOS. You tell me that Catalina will not run natively. Do you know what this is due to? You mean that Big Sur and Monterey will run natively. I am very grateful for your attention.
Greetings.
Jose Antonio.
The last version of MacOS that will run natively (no OpenCore or similar) is Mojave. Catalina, Big Sur and Monterey all require a UEFI intermediary to make the installer/OS think it is being installed on supported hardware. This is what OpenCore achieves, providing that interface. It also protects the Mac UEFI by preventing Windows from talking to it/modifying it, which can mess things up.

Not sure what is going on with your disk error, this only cropped up once you moved back from using OpenCore? If so, it's likely an artifact of that and it's possible that going back to a newer OS will eliminate the error.

As I said, I found Big Sur slower than Monterey. Navigating folders was slower, I also had a strange issue with Chrome that required the purge command, as everything would stop working. Both of those things are not happening in Monterey, which runs smoothly, though I still find the graphics performance to be a downgrade from Mojave, which I assume is due to whatever Apple did when they decided they were going to phase-out Nvidia support.
 
I've been upgrading using OC through all OS and I am on Monterey 12.2.1. I haven't noticed graphics sluggishness. I use the 5,1 for work and personal activities but don't using it for gaming and such. Using apps like GIMP and some work-related programs that may be graphics light dependent have no problems. The only issues I have is slow boot since BS (from threads due to Samsung NVME 970 EVO SSD) but can live with that as apparent fix is to reformat and clean install, also I have noticed of late that disk access activities like saving a file from within an app are sluggish to display finder window. Not sure yet but may be mostly related to MS Office apps. I have been assuming this is also related to SSD but again not that problematic.

My set up is in my signature.
You are using a Radeon card. My suspicion is that the NVidia driver included in Big Sur doesn't perform as well as the one used for Mojave, but I have no proof of that. Something clearly changed though, because I had issues with dual displays, as have other people, which didn't happen on Mojave. This was also resolved with Monterey, so whatever driver the OCLP folks used to re-enable support must be different than the Big Sur one.
 
I finally bit the bullet and upgraded my main 5,1 to bigsur 11.6.4. I have been testing OC.76 and bigsur in my spare for a couple of months but my main machine has been running dosdude catalina for over a year. So far no complaints, I moved the OC drive across and upgraded the OC to .77 then ran the bigsur installers over my old drive and removed any files that might be a problem manually. Seemed a little slow initially while doing its update things but its all caught up now

I will start the Monterey testing soon, but overall i'm happy with big sur. I think the cutsey iphone style graphics in the interface waste a bit of graphical computer power , if i'm not mistaken
BTW 7SAUM/6LAP here :)
I found disk access in Big Sur to take a hit over Mojave, but that seems to have disappeared with Monterey, which seems to be in general, faster. Like 6DecadesLater, you are using a Radeon card, so I suspect my issue is NVidia driver related.

I should probably clarify that it's not awful, but there are the odd visual lags. The big thing for me was performance in games dropped massively when I installed Big Sur. The settings that worked flawlessly for Borderlands 2 under Mojave caused massive lag under Big Sur, which seemed to come and go in waves.
 
- 0xe00002e2 error after nvrest and blessing it again. Was going to install on partition, already did a expat, and tried to option in to the usb drive i had windows installer on. black screen. nvram reset now i can't load open core. **** this unstable garbage.
Ugh, that sucks. Were you trying to run the Windows installer through OpenCore? If so, that won't work. I think the easiest way for you is to use the VirtualBox method, which yields a bootable installation that has already gone through the first phase of the setup (basically the same as what I did with a spare PC) that you then boot directly using OpenCore.
 
Hi overkill338LM, thanks for replying. I'm still on High Sierra and have tested a Sapphire Radeon Nitro+ RX 5700XT. Which I have finally flashed with EFI MAC. I decided to flash because of an issue I've already raised in OC threads, (I used Martin's OC exactly as explained), but I didn't get a completely clear answer. My question is focused on saying what operating system to install, so as not to have to suffer the damn Warning "incompatible Disk" This Disk uses fractures that are not supported on this version of macOS. You tell me that Catalina will not run natively. Do you know what this is due to? You mean that Big Sur and Monterey will run natively. I am very grateful for your attention.
Greetings.
Jose Antonio.
How did you get an RX5700XT to run on High Sierra when drivers for it didn't come out until Catalina 10.15.1?
 
How did you get an RX5700XT to run on High Sierra when drivers for it didn't come out until Catalina 10.15.1?
For flashed cards that the macOS release you are booting do not yet have the GPU drivers, the display works via the fall-back EFI drivers.

It's completely un-accelerated, with extremely limited functionality. Good for diagnostics and maybe light non 3D/non video work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: prefuse07
How did you get an RX5700XT to run on High Sierra when drivers for it didn't come out until Catalina 10.15.1?
Hello prefuso07, from what I can see, my translator is sometimes not very fine. What I meant is that I went back to High Sierra, obviously I had to disassemble the Sapphire Nitro+ graphics card and mount the Nvidia one that I have already flashed, that is, change one for another.
 
For flashed cards that the macOS release you are booting do not yet have the GPU drivers, the display works via the fall-back EFI drivers.

It's completely un-accelerated, with extremely limited functionality. Good for diagnostics and maybe light non 3D/non video work.
For flashed cards that the macOS release you are booting do not yet have the GPU drivers, the display works via the fall-back EFI drivers.

It's completely un-accelerated, with extremely limited functionality. Good for diagnostics and maybe light non 3D/non video work.
Hello tsialex, from what I see, my translator is sometimes not very fine. What I meant is that I went back to High Sierra, obviously I had to disassemble the Sapphire Nitro+ graphics card and mount the Nvidia one that I already flashed, that is, change one for another.
 
I imagine wired and not wireless right ?
I don’t want to speak too soon for anyone else, but I use only wired. I’m reinstalling Mojave after some ****up open core did, glad I never used the same drive. Anywho yeah, now every time I get past the install it asks me to turn on my mouse. Note the line that runs to the bt on the logic board is snapped. Never thought I needed latency on a mouse or replace bats again. Pretty cool stuff.

Again, awesome!

edit: i chose z for boogie woogie ?
 

Attachments

  • A5B1D23A-DBDE-4988-A271-E6C38B0569BA.jpeg
    A5B1D23A-DBDE-4988-A271-E6C38B0569BA.jpeg
    354 KB · Views: 99
Last edited:
What video card would you recommend... being the price is super inflated now. Is the RX580 the goto or is there another one about that price range I should look at?
I have a GTX 680 and a AMD Radeon HD 7950 , about 150 euros, in Monterey. They work real good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TimothyR734
How do you make Kepler gtx 680 work in Monterey?
One way is OCLP post install option. You won't get macOS updates after that. You have to download a full macOS installer to do an update. If updating the current installation results in a boot loop, you can install to a new location and use migration assistant to get your files from the old location.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VaZ and TimothyR734
One way is OCLP post install option. You won't get macOS updates after that. You have to download a full macOS installer to do an update. If updating the current installation results in a boot loop, you can install to a new location and use migration assistant to get your files from the old location.
Yes, that's what I used, the OCLP patcher, was stupidly easy.
 
Is anyone using FileVault in Monterey? Any risks / downsides? Can it just be turned on, or are there any other considerations?
 
Hello everyone!
I was running Mojave 10.14.16 (installed on an m.2 ssd) on my mac pro 4.1/5.1 2x 3.46 GHz CPU, 18 GB RAM, SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX590 with opencore 0.7.7 installed in an HDD in the slot 1.
When I first ran the last release from Martin I had no HDMI audio, so I started checking out some posts from several users with the same bug, I didn't find much info so I started checking the config file and decided to disable GOP rendering (set it to false) and I got my HDMI audio, yay! Everything was running awesome so I deciced to try out Catalina 10.15.6 so I installed it and I still had HDMI audio, so now I wanted to get a Win 10 UEFI install. On the README file, Martin says its best to put opencore on a windows drive if you have one, so I followed the procedure on the opencore on the mac pro 5.1 thread to install WIN 10 in a SATA SSD in slot 2 and got it running succesfully, my windows 10 uefi install is running great, installed some games and they ran just fine (and I do have HDMI audio).
I kinda tried to perform Martin's instructions to move OC to the windows EFI folder but tbh I didn't understand how to do it correctly, I just did what the README file stated and I assumed I had to erase the oc and boot folders from the EFI of the HDD that had opencore on my mac but it didnt really work because opencore didnt boot and it went straight into my mac partition, so I just turned it off, removed the opencore hdd on slot one, power on, blessed the EFI WIN ssd with the file inculded in Martin's release, and after a reboot I had opencore back so I turned it off again, put back my hdd in slot 1, and my mac is still booting opencore.
I don't really know if what I did was the right way to do it.
Today I decided to install big sur 11.6.1 and suddenly I no longer had my HDMI audio output. So Im trying to figure out which parts of the config I should be checking for to enable my HDMI audio once more and hope anyone can also help me out confirming if moving OC to the WIN 10 SSD like I did was ok, maybe that's what broke my HDMI audio in the first place.
Thank you all in advance, this bootloader is awesome and my mac pro feels superb.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.