Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
MLB 2023
- Thread starter maflynn
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I just woke up and saw the results of the first game of the divisional round, I have to say I was surprised. Arizona going 1-0 up against the Dodgers? Texas going 1-0 up against the Orioles? I guess now’s when we find out what these teams are made of, seems a lot of new contenders are making themselves felt.
Love seeing Kershaw getting rocked! LOVE IT! Classic... Come on DBack's!!!
Pretty close games last night. Looks like the Dodgers may not make the NLCS, let alone the World Series. Given the relatively strong showing of the wild card teams, who would say that the extra rest the seeded teams get is really an advantage?
If the Dodgers get swept, I want a Twins/D-backs WS.
Lesson to be learned: winning 100 games don't mean crap. Its also ridiculous that thety use 3 and 5 game series. Baseball is too fluke-y to have such short series. The World Series used to be best of 9.
Oh I think it adds charm to use the short series. If you win 100 games but don’t get your timing right with regards to form or aren’t clutch when it matters, you go out. That’s fine by me, it means that a plucky lesser team who do have a big game mentality can put together a deep post-season run.
Anyway that is what makes a great manager, that ability to inspire a team to a really big game. That is why rivalries are so important, I think winning Red Sox teams of the last 20 years have been quite good examples of clutch-ness, but would they have been as great without the regular Yankees games to sharpen them up?
Also there is the whole thing of “how many teams participate vs the number of games to be played vs how late in the year do you continue” balance.
Anyway that is what makes a great manager, that ability to inspire a team to a really big game. That is why rivalries are so important, I think winning Red Sox teams of the last 20 years have been quite good examples of clutch-ness, but would they have been as great without the regular Yankees games to sharpen them up?
Also there is the whole thing of “how many teams participate vs the number of games to be played vs how late in the year do you continue” balance.
Last edited:
That's my other pet peeve - too many playoff teams. Division winners, plus one wildcard was perfect.
So the Orioles, many people’s pick to be in the World Series, get swept…
Yeah, that was a bummer. I was hoping to see them play in the Series. But they're good, young, and now have some experience. They'll be tough again next year.
If they repeat this year's success next year, they'll go even further. Wouldn't surprise me if they sign a few big names this off season to help them get over that last hump. But in their defense, the Rangers are like a wrecking ball so there's that too.
They and the Astros... just wow!
It's down to the Rangers, Twins(very little hope for them), and Phillies for me.
Rangers got hot again at the right time, first sweeping the Rays and now the Orioles. I'd be fairly pleased to see Bruce Bochy win another ring. He's going to need to wring as much magic as he can out of that pitching staff and bullpen, who are nowhere near as good as the Giants' late inning specialists at their peak. Or else their offense had better keep bludgeoning the opposition.
It’s the one after. We were one strike away from winning the WS. Twice.
And we lost.
One strike away…
in 1977 or 78 Toby Harrah singed his baseball card and then swatted my expo hat I was wearing in Yankee stadium.
go rangers!
I was really pulling for the Twins but at least they got the post-season win out of the way.Phillies up 2 -1
Twins out!
bodgers OUT!!
As for the Dodgers...I got nothin. They did what the Dodgers do and it's the same story as always. Amazing regular season. Dumpster fire in the post season.
Yeah, the schadenfreude is in overdrive right now with the Dodgers bowing out meekly. They simply ran out of starting pitching this season.
[EDIT: and Mookie Betts and Freddie Freeman had only one hit between them? Yikes.]
[EDIT: and Mookie Betts and Freddie Freeman had only one hit between them? Yikes.]
Last edited: