Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Therein lies the whole issue. You want the iPad and macbook to converge ala what Microsoft has done with the Surface Pro, a product which, for all the praise leaped on it by the tech blogging community, hasn't exactly caught on with the masses, because it causes as many problems as it solves.

You are taking the needs and desires of what is likely an extremely niche but vocal group of users and attempting to project them onto the entire iPad community, without also considering if that is what the rest need or want, much less if such a move might be deleterious to the overall user experience.


And they shouldn't need to. The iPad is a touchscreen tablet first and foremost. Developers should continue to optimise their apps based on the assumption that users will interact with the app via the touchscreen and only the touchscreen. Everything else is of secondary importance.


Because a mouse would change the interaction between literally every other element in the OS. The mouse pointer has a presence even when there is no active input, which is exactly the opposite of the touch model—input only exists when the user is pressing on the screen, and when they let go, that’s it. The mouse pointer has a position on the screen and continues to exist even when its not displayed or being moved. You can ‘hover’ a mouse pointer over something.

So how do you handle the mouse in the touch system? Do you treat it exactly like the finger? So your click is exactly like your touch? Launching apps is then a single-click, and drawing requires that you click and drag all around the screen? What happens when you reach the end of the screen? Fingers stop touching the screen, but the mouse pointer is now jammed up against the side. You can lift your finger and randomly access anywhere on the screen quickly, but with a mouse pointer, you’re confined to linear motion—you cannot simply go from here to there without crossing the intervening space. THEN you have the additional trouble of making the targets on the screen sufficiently accessible to a mouse.

The user interface guidelines would be a mess. Menu access would suddenly become necessary. You’d have to consider Fitts’ law all over again.

If Apple were going to do all that work, there’d be no reason to duplicate it, which is why I say that mouse support won’t happen unless they merge the OSes into one. It’s a considerable amount of overhead for very little gain on their parts. From your perspective, it seems like you should just be able to move a mouse around and click, but from theirs (and by extension, the perspective of the app developers that would be on the hook for handling this interaction model), it means re-inspecting all sorts of assumptions that they’ve left as solved.


The ASK remains an optional accessory for the iPad. People are not forced to use it like they are pretty much forced to use a keyboard and trackpad with a Macbook. You are free to detach the iPad and use it as a tablet when it would be more conducive, or dock it and type away for when a dedicated keyboard is more suitable.

It's up to you to decide which compromise you would rather make.
...what are your thoughts on the arrow keys Apple included on the Smart Keyboard? Seems to me they provide an appalling and dreadfully antithetical manner of interacting with the touchscreen without pressing on it.
 
...what are your thoughts on the arrow keys Apple included on the Smart Keyboard? Seems to me they provide an appalling and dreadfully antithetical manner of interacting with the touchscreen without pressing on it.
I have no thoughts on it, though I personally have little need for them in the rare occasions when I type using a bluetooth keyboard. I guess having it is better than not having it, since it resides on the keyboard already, rather than as some sort of external numpad accessory.
 
I have no thoughts on it, though I personally have little need for them in the rare occasions when I type using a bluetooth keyboard. I guess having it is better than not having it, since it resides on the keyboard already, rather than as some sort of external numpad accessory.
Like a trackpad on a keyboard? Or Lenovo’s red nub implementation?
 
Like a trackpad on a keyboard? Or Lenovo’s red nub implementation?

Not exactly. If you read my explanation above, I do detail why I feel implementing cursor support might require a complete rethinking of how the touch interface might work on iOS. To me, it's not so simple as simply having a floating arrow on the screen and calling it a day.

And yes, I do find working on spreadsheets a pain on my iPad, but I am willing to bite the bullet and wait for a better app solution to present itself, rather than for Apple to take what I view as a short-sighted bandaid.

But who knows. I could be wrong and Apple might find a way to make it work. I was wrong about the usefulness of split-screen multitasking and a file manager after all (though to be fair, Apple's version of files is more like Documents, which I am already using).
 
To me, it's not so simple as simply having a floating arrow on the screen and calling it a day.

So the jailbreak community was able to give us a cursor presence at all times without impact to iOS, but apple can't?

You find it easy to use touch to highlight text on an idevice and then select that text? Its a nightmare.
 
You find it easy to use touch to highlight text on an idevice and then select that text? Its a nightmare.
Regardless of mouse support the implementation of that feauture sucks. It's incredible that is was left unchanged (just became more buggy) since iOS3
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raist3001
Someone posted this on Reddit:
https://insideinnovation.co/gorilla-arms-will-make-you-stop-using-the-ipad-pro-92922c2c4e5c

So that brings me back to my initial statement that all the people here who are so much against mouse / trackpad support have probably never used the iPad Pro 12.9 for more than an hour and for anything that is not related to art / surfing the web and replying to an email while the iPad is docked. They have probably never used the iPad for anything that requires lots of interactions with the screen for longer periods of time.
Our bodies are not made to lift our arms 200+ times per hour to reach and touch the screen for every little action we would like to preform on a computer device. It's just never physically going to work without some side effects. Apple WILL need to create a solution for that if they want to see any additional iPad Pros selling well and replacing our daily traditional computers. While Apple is trying to innovative, they can't reinvent the wheel and change how the human body is built.
This is exactly why they never created a touch screen Mac...but oddly they did create a huge 12.9'' touch screen iPad.

People will not continue to purchase the iPad Pro and spend so much money after they realize that this device doesn't really do anything much better than a regular iPad or tablet (unless you are an artist). Sure, it has a great screen and great mobile apps but if my arm hurts using it...what's the point? Of working on it does not simplify anything for me, what's the point? For real work during prolonged times the iPad MUST get a pointing device that does not require the user to lift his/her arm.

I'm also pretty sure that most of the people who are willing to spend so much on an iPad Pro are buying it for work purposes. They are not spending so much to watch Netflix on the device or reply to simple emails. Until there is mouse / trackpad / pointing device the iPad Pro will fail to deliver to the main audience it attracts and these customers will look elsewhere for a mobile device that they can actually do work on without the arm fatigue side effect.

Some posters here say we are a very small minority. I say that the more people actually use the device like they do their laptops, we will become the majority.
 
That's precisely what I am suggesting. Use the best tool for the job. If you need mouse support to work on a spreadsheet, either use a PC, or learn to put up with the idiosyncrasies of working with one on a tablet.
What are you espousing here? Tablet purity? That went out the window with the smart cover. Does the smart cover--with its keyboard shortcuts--impinge on the "tabletness" of the ipad pro? No. Apple liked the idea so much they started pushing the "laptop replacement" meme. But you are drawing the line at the keyboard; the mouse or trackpad would be a step too far! The addition of a pointing capability is : "toasters and refrigerators" madness.

This is an insane distinction. You are welcome to the "idiosyncrasies" of the current workflow, but many here want the flexibility of a true hybrid device. And if Apple gave it to them. it would affect your ipad use not a wit.
[doublepost=1501443976][/doublepost]
As for your Excel comment. Most people actually don't use Excel. And those that do know that the version on the iPad has far more problems than the lack of mouse support. If am using Excel for significant data entry or calculation, I am using it on macOS or Windows, and mouse support is the least of my reasons why.
Many excel users do not need to do heavy entry of calculation on their mobile devices: they just need to review and/or update files.
 
Many excel users do not need to do heavy entry of calculation on their mobile devices: they just need to review and/or update files.

So why would you need a mouse for that? I guess my point was that if I was editing a spreadsheet enough to really want to use a mouse, I would probably just use a laptop. If I am editing a cell or two, then I can suffer for that 30 seconds. And if I am reviewing it as you say, then by definition I wouldn't really be interacting in order to want a mouse. Excel is a great example of when a mouse would be very useful, probably necessary. Unfortunately it is also a great example of an app I don't use the mobile version of because of its limitations, no mouse being one of many.
 
I'd like mouse support, but its not the end of the world. Doesn't make any sense why they wouldn't just allow the option if people care to use it.

I asked one of the guys at the Apple Store about it and he basically said hardly anyone has asked Apple for it. In the 4 years he has worked there only 2 other people have mentioned mouse support on an iPad. Be interesting to see where they get their data from with those sorts of requests.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SDColorado
So the jailbreak community was able to give us a cursor presence at all times without impact to iOS, but apple can't?

You find it easy to use touch to highlight text on an idevice and then select that text? Its a nightmare.

This is really a big problem for me everytime also.
 
Seems the iPad sells very well without mouse support :). Perhaps people uses the iPad in different ways compared to a laptop and that is the whole idea with the iPad. New methods to interact with iPad type of devices will evolve and will eventually replace the now ancient keyboard and mouse user input. This debate is the same as the prompt vs GUI in the 80th and early 90th and look what happened.
 
Seems the iPad sells very well without mouse support :). Perhaps people uses the iPad in different ways compared to a laptop and that is the whole idea with the iPad. New methods to interact with iPad type of devices will evolve and will eventually replace the now ancient keyboard and mouse user input. This debate is the same as the prompt vs GUI in the 80th and early 90th and look what happened.

They are selling okay. The question I ask is could they be selling better if there were a few more features, such as better file support (kind of coming in iOS11) and mouse support? New ways of interacting don't necessarily mean better ways. A touch OS is great when not using an ASK. But when you are, it slows a user down and is an ergonomic mess.
 
They are selling okay. The question I ask is could they be selling better if there were a few more features, such as better file support (kind of coming in iOS11) and mouse support? New ways of interacting don't necessarily mean better ways. A touch OS is great when not using an ASK. But when you are, it slows a user down and is an ergonomic mess.
IPad outsell mac 2 to 1 - I would say that is quite OK. I agree that touch and ASK is a bad combination, but then again why buy a iPad if you use a ASK centric workflow? New ways are not necessarily worse either. Now there is at least an alterative to keyboard and mouse setup which is great.

I think keeping mouse support out of the iPad will benefit the iPad in the long run as software developers will be forced to think outside the keyboard and mouse paradigm. If you need better precision, buy a pencil. We also have to factor in the iPhone which often uses simpler interface of the same software as the corresponding iPad. So in that respect, the iPad may benefit more by leaning towards the iPhone(touch) than the Mac(keyboard and mouse).

The only time I use ASK is when I need to write long manuscripts. The reason I use it is not because I do not like touch keyboards but I need the larger screen real estate. Writing manuscripts provides little need for touch as the two finger cursor is mostly sufficiant. Software arrows, page up and down, would however be helpful for navigating text.
 
  • Like
Reactions: subjonas
What about having a mouse cursor visable when using a mouse and not visible when using touch?

That is how it works on Windows so why not the iPad?

That is exactly how it would work on an iPad as well. Anyone who has used the Xcode iOS virtual machines can tell it works just fine.
 
It's really a silly argument. There is no reason at all that Apple couldn't introduce mouse support when using certain productivity or editing apps. This is where they make sense. It simply comes down to money. No UI changes would be needed, people wouldn't be confused, fingers would still work, all would be fine.
 
IPad outsell mac 2 to 1 - I would say that is quite OK. I agree that touch and ASK is a bad combination, but then again why buy a iPad if you use a ASK centric workflow? New ways are not necessarily worse either. Now there is at least an alterative to keyboard and mouse setup which is great.

I didn't buy the iPad because I have an ASK centric workflow. As has been discussed at great length in this thread though, mouse support would make my iPad far more useful and would allow me to leave my MBP home at times instead of having to bring both devices.
 
What's the logic behind no mouse/trackpad support in iOS?
Steve's history appears to be reflected still in at least some of the decisions/non-decisions made at Apple.
 
I'd settle for an in-built trackpad that functions exactly like the Apple Remote for the Apple TV.

Since tvOS is essentially a version of iOS designed for a larger, non-touch sensitive screen, I don't see why Apple can't implement the same input method for iOS. If Apple can improve on the user interface, I think this can be a very elegant approach.
 
I think mouse support IS coming. If I had a mouse, I could truly use my iPad for work. I could RDP to my PC at work and with a mouse and keyboard it would be like I'm there. Perfect. Mouse support is already possible via Citrix on the iPad.

I'm always baffled by those against it. It's literally a matter of turning on the ability to pair a mouse natively. Doesn't harm anyone or anything.

So you want to use an iPad to replace a PC by using the iPad to remotely connect to a PC?

Just cut the iPad in the middle.
 
I didn't buy the iPad because I have an ASK centric workflow. As has been discussed at great length in this thread though, mouse support would make my iPad far more useful and would allow me to leave my MBP home at times instead of having to bring both devices.
The only reason I see for a mouse is if you have an ASK centric workflow, ie emulating laptop mode. The reason I oppose mouse support is becuase it gives developers an excuse not to develop proper touch or pencil interactions. Developers have a tendency to take the easiest route, partly because consumers don't want to pay the price for development. Do I lack trackpad sometimes on iPad? Yes, but the reason is often poor a touch interface implementations which is a software issue. Take the two finger "trackpad" function. Why not navigate with two fingers, add a third finger for selection and fourth finger for moving the selected part. Perfectly doable.

I think the mouse was a proxy for touch and pencil 30 years ago and its existance has been challanged since the introduction of the multitouch trackpad.

Will iPad be more usable with mouse/trackpad support - yes, for the moment and in my opinion only for those with ASK centered workflows using softwares poorly designed for touch/pencil.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.