Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Wide opeN

macrumors 68000
Aug 27, 2010
1,763
1,035
Georgia
Anybody ever notice Samsung simply copies Apple's old designs!?

iPhone 6 moves away from chamfered edges, guess who picks them up!? Samsung... Also, they're trying to bight with curved edges.

How any uses Samsungs MINDLESS designs is beyond me #!? All they do is bite Apple.
 

mib1800

Suspended
Sep 16, 2012
2,859
1,250
Anybody ever notice Samsung simply copies Apple's old designs!?

iPhone 6 moves away from chamfered edges, guess who picks them up!? Samsung... Also, they're trying to bight with curved edges.

How any uses Samsungs MINDLESS designs is beyond me #!? All they do is bite Apple.

And Iphone 6 copied the design of Note 2 with its rounded rim.

And 4/4s copied from this Nokia

nokia-n78-pictures10.jpg
 

iososx

macrumors 6502a
Aug 23, 2014
859
6
USA
I've put my iPhone 6 Plus side by side with my Note 4. They're both excellent, just different and yet not by a wide margin. It's truly a matter of personal preference. Bias exists everywhere and the "experts" that claim one is so much better is a person who is biased to that brand.

Or extremely biased to a certain type of display. I'm very picky about the phones I buy, that's why I decide what phones interest me and buy them so I can decide based on first hand experience with the phone in my environment performing the tasks I use my smartphones for.

Then because I like change and variety I keep the four I like the best. Since Apple's limited to just one phone in two sizes I'll always have an iPhone and one or more Android phones. That's what I enjoy.
 

jamezr

macrumors P6
Aug 7, 2011
16,079
19,078
US
And the world copied the original iphone...so what.
Really do you have proof to back that up? How did that play out in court? Not so good huh?

Here is what Samsung phones looked like before and after the iphone. So no copying was going on.......

ishyyVhl.png


zdbInFdl.jpg
 

The-Real-Deal82

macrumors P6
Jan 17, 2013
17,318
25,470
Wales, United Kingdom
I don't know why people get wound up about them copying each other? It happens in every industry and there is no doubt the original iPhone was the game changer. The Original Samsung Galaxy was deemed to have taken heavy influence from the iPhone 3GS, but a few court settlements later and we have a decent level of competition. I don't think a bit of copying did anybody any harm.

Looking at the picture above of the Nokia and the suggestion the iPhone 4 drew influence from it. That may well be so, but I would imagine Nokia would rather than wasn't advertised too loudly as the comparison between the two devices is gulf's apart. Copying existed long before Apple or Samsung started making touchscreen phones, so what? :)
 

I7guy

macrumors Nehalem
Nov 30, 2013
35,162
25,281
Gotta be in it to win it
still does not play to your copying claims now does it? Apple sells more phones than anyone else. So what is your point again because it is not very clear.

Mr real deal somehow understood. Companies do copy designs, motifs, methods and its up to the courts to decide who infringes on what when meritorious suits are lodged in the court system.
 

Wiesenlooser

macrumors 6502a
Jul 9, 2010
987
1,551
Really do you have proof to back that up? How did that play out in court? Not so good huh?

Here is what Samsung phones looked like before and after the iphone. So no copying was going on.......

Image

Image

That is wrong, wrong and wrong again. The q-bowl line was not shown before the iPhone introduction. It was announced (again - not shown) on February 2007 and released on fall of 2007. So technically they had enough time to scrap it together
 

Michael Goff

Suspended
Jul 5, 2012
13,329
7,422
That is wrong, wrong and wrong again. The q-bowl line was not shown before the iPhone introduction. It was announced (again - not shown) on February 2007 and released on fall of 2007. So technically they had enough time to scrap it together

Do you honestly believe what you're pushing?
 

jamezr

macrumors P6
Aug 7, 2011
16,079
19,078
US
That is wrong, wrong and wrong again. The q-bowl line was not shown before the iPhone introduction. It was announced (again - not shown) on February 2007 and released on fall of 2007. So technically they had enough time to scrap it together

Did you read the picture? It said it was in development in 2006. Before the iPhone was released. This was all proven in court. Apple did not invent the a bar like phone with rounded corners. It existed before the iphone. All of this is factual.
The patents were filed in 2006 prior to the release on the original iphone

The phone has a 3.2" color display and incorporates a touch screen/touch pad interaction system and a slide-out QWERTY key pad. The phone contains a 3 megapixel camera. Furthermore, the handset is HSDPA and Bluetooth 2.0 compatible and possesses USB and microSD memory slots.[2] A Korean design patent for this black, rectangular, round-cornered phone was filed by Samsung in December 2006 prior to the release of the image of the iPhone[3] but after the release of the HTC TyTn which it resembles with its rectangular design and slide out keyboard.

The touchscreen allows to control the entire handset. The "Croix UI" was awarded the iF Communication Design Award for 2007.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_SGH-F700
 

jrswizzle

macrumors 603
Aug 23, 2012
6,107
129
McKinney, TX
Is this argument really happening?

How many times do you guys have to argue the same things back and forth before you just decide to.....

mf-140214-246487030411076960.jpg
 

Daiphoneboss

macrumors member
Jan 5, 2015
56
0
The iPhone 6+ is literally just a bigger iPhone, its Apple copying Android oem's because they couldn't ignore the demand for bigger phones anymore.

For years Apple kept repeating '3.5" is the ideal size' which then changed to 'oh no we really meant 4 is the perfect size'.

Apple copies Android - just like notifications, control center, copy paste, Siri, custom keyboards, notification widgets, typing prediction, and tons more.

It's pretty well known any new innovation takes a few years or more to show up in Apple products, but its usually polished, and its always proprietary. This is what they do.

Samsung, LG big phones all contain features designed to make your life easier. But these companies don't have Apple's marketing or rabid fans, so they are made fun of.

e.g. Samsung's gesture to reduce screen size is MUCH more useful than Apple's - I'd rather have the entire phone UI rather than shrinking it to half size. Yet most reviews tell users Apple has a great feature.

Other than landscape mode in a few apps, Apple did nothing to utilize the big screen. Of course this is part of their strategy - why add 2 features when you can stretch them out over multiple releases.

And android stole features from iOS, whats your point?
 

mi7chy

macrumors G4
Oct 24, 2014
10,628
11,299
Waste of breath to argue about chamfer edge that's been around for centuries on sculptures, furniture, watches, etc.
 

mclld

macrumors 68030
Nov 6, 2012
2,658
2,127
First World Problems thread
\
people should be down right embarrassed and ashamed to get bumthurt over this stuff
 

I7guy

macrumors Nehalem
Nov 30, 2013
35,162
25,281
Gotta be in it to win it
Did you read the picture? It said it was in development in 2006. Before the iPhone was released. This was all proven in court. Apple did not invent the a bar like phone with rounded corners. It existed before the iphone. All of this is factual.
The patents were filed in 2006 prior to the release on the original iphone



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_SGH-F700

Apple has patents on the design of the iphone, which means they didn't copy anything. And yes the court cases started and dragged on for years. But here in the US Samsung could lose billions while Apple could lose millions.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.