Unfortunately in the long term, shiny keycaps can never be avoided. It's a drawback of Apple's use of ABS plastic for its keycaps. The shine the keys eventually develop happens due to friction between your fingers and keys, literally wearing away the surface of the keys. It's bugbear of mine and I wish Apple would address it some way.The Nano Texture display, being etched rather than coated, is more durable than a glossy coating.
1. It is less likely to pick up oil than a glossy display.
2. While the provided cloth makes cleaning fairly easy, it's not as effortless as using Apple's Polishing Cloth, especially when dust is present. With the provided cloth, I have to remove dust with my fingers before wiping away oil, whereas the Apple Polishing Cloth cleans everything in one swipe, highly recommended that you use Apple's Polishing Cloth.
You may consider using this:
![]()
MacBook Pro keyboard cover, screen protector and cleaner
Display screen protector, cleaner and refinisher for MacBook Pro. Custom sizes available for any laptop computerwww.radtech.com
I clean oil off my keyboard everytime I close the lid. You don't have to do that but I really hate shinny keycaps.
Exactly, why do people touch MacBook screens? dumb....but the nano texture on the new MBP is different from iPad version. Plus, I don't plan to touch the screen on a MBP like an iPad.
I suggest you use light feather duster to regularly remove dust particles. It makes maintenance very quick and easy.The Nano Texture display, being etched rather than coated, is more durable than a glossy coating.
1. It is less likely to pick up oil than a glossy display.
2. While the provided cloth makes cleaning fairly easy, it's not as effortless as using Apple's Polishing Cloth, especially when dust is present. With the provided cloth, I have to remove dust with my fingers before wiping away oil, whereas the Apple Polishing Cloth cleans everything in one swipe, highly recommended that you use Apple's Polishing Cloth.
You may consider using this:
![]()
MacBook Pro keyboard cover, screen protector and cleaner
Display screen protector, cleaner and refinisher for MacBook Pro. Custom sizes available for any laptop computerwww.radtech.com
I clean oil off my keyboard everytime I close the lid. You don't have to do that but I really hate shinny keycaps.
I use a very thin silicone keyboard cover which prevents the shine. Works well.Unfortunately in the long term, shiny keycaps can never be avoided. It's a drawback of Apple's use of ABS plastic for its keycaps. The shine the keys eventually develop happens due to friction between your fingers and keys, literally wearing away the surface of the keys. It's bugbear of mine and I wish Apple would address it some way.
I think there is no way for Apple to use PBT keycaps because the keycaps must be thin for better backlighting and color consistency. The keycaps would definitely still shine, but at a much lower rate (I did some experiments).Unfortunately in the long term, shiny keycaps can never be avoided. It's a drawback of Apple's use of ABS plastic for its keycaps. The shine the keys eventually develop happens due to friction between your fingers and keys, literally wearing away the surface of the keys. It's bugbear of mine and I wish Apple would address it some way.
I found what I thought might be kryptonite for nano displays: bold fonts in a Terminal window with Homebrew profile (green-on-black like an old-school terminal). So I went to the Apple store and put a nano and non-nano 14" MBP side-by-side and took these photos, click for full resolution pics:Answering my own quesiton here with a YouTube video of someone in the Apple Store comparing nano texture against their matte screen protector.
I still much prefer the nano-texture. While the matte screen protector appears to diffuse more light, it also happens to spread the light in a way that creates more glare and obscures the image. Another advantage of nano-texture is it seems less prone to making contact with the keyboard. You can clearly see the added thickness of the matte screen protectory shows the keyboard imprint.
This might have something to do with the angle of camera being straight on the glossy DESCRIPTION but at a angle on the nano DESCRIPTION.I found what I thought might be kryptonite for nano displays: bold fonts in a Terminal window with Homebrew profile (green-on-black like an old-school terminal). So I went to the Apple store and put a nano and non-nano 14" MBP side-by-side and took these photos, click for full resolution pics:
View attachment 2471111View attachment 2471110
It seemed to me that both were equally blurry on the bold fonts (e.g. "DESCRIPTION"). That might be partly my astigmatism. It doesn't really look the same in the photos as it did to my eyes.
The nano is on the left, glossy on the right.
Compared with other matte laptop screens I have used, I am not impressed by nano-texture. What other options do I have for the MacBook Pro 16"?
Interesting. Compared to other matte laptops I have used, I am very impressed with the nano-texture. What laptops are you using that come with such great matte screens?Compared with other matte laptop screens I have used, I am not impressed by nano-texture. What other options do I have for the MacBook Pro 16"?
are you sure one is nano? Both look glossy hereI found what I thought might be kryptonite for nano displays: bold fonts in a Terminal window with Homebrew profile (green-on-black like an old-school terminal). So I went to the Apple store and put a nano and non-nano 14" MBP side-by-side and took these photos, click for full resolution pics:
View attachment 2471111
If you compare displays in a dark room, the glossy may appear slightly brighter, but when there is a fair amount of ambient light, the nano advantages will far outweigh that. In bright to very bright settings, you will need to set the glossy to much higher brightness to overcome reflections and achieve reasonable readability, while the nano will be awesome.Will nano make a difference under 5m x 5m outdoor patio, no direct sun?
And is non nano a brighter screen?
Ok it’s light no walls on 2 sides.If you compare displays in a dark room, the glossy may appear slightly brighter, but when there is a fair amount of ambient light, the nano advantages will far outweigh that. In bright to very bright settings, you will need to set the glossy to much higher brightness to overcome reflections and achieve reasonable readability, while the nano will be awesome.
So if it's a bright patio, I would definitely choose the nano. If it's a dark patio, you can get either.
Apple appears to have done a great job at finding the right balance in dulling reflections without causing too much diffusion.The nano texture screen is amazing (at reducing glare). I'm using a Dell UP2720Q with MBP 16 with M1 Pro. The Dell screen is matte of course. But compared with the nano texture display on my new MBP 14 with M4 max, the latter is way better. It happened to be a bright sunny day. I took the picture with all nature lighting. It's obvious which is better.
View attachment 2472719
Also on 14" M3 and will go back to 16" M4 (nano).I almost went back to 16-inch size with nano, but I reread some of my old posts and reminded myself what I didn't like/need about the MBP 16.
I found what I thought might be kryptonite for nano displays: bold fonts in a Terminal window with Homebrew profile (green-on-black like an old-school terminal). So I went to the Apple store and put a nano and non-nano 14" MBP side-by-side and took these photos, click for full resolution pics:
View attachment 2471111View attachment 2471110
It seemed to me that both were equally blurry on the bold fonts (e.g. "DESCRIPTION"). That might be partly my astigmatism. It doesn't really look the same in the photos as it did to my eyes.
The nano is on the left, glossy on the right.
Will nano make a difference under 5m x 5m outdoor patio, no direct sun?
And is non nano a brighter screen?
It looks like a mat screen protector. Not trying to hurt anyone’s feelings but what a waste of money