Total nonsense predictions based on the supply chain. Cook has been on record multiple times saying not to predict iPhone sales based on the supply chain.
But the claims of lack of success in this thread have been about iPhone X so far, not the future.You stated in a post just before this one that Cook cannot, “sound off” well the same applies to the spokespeople of the their suppliers who have told investors that Apple has significantly reduced orders for the next 2 quarters.
Tim Cook was very careful with his wording when he described the X as the best selling so far and he made absolutely no future predictions about it which is a little odd considering it remains their flagship until September.
The X had a good first quarter and a lesser, although still better than expected, 2nd quarter.
Based upon what the supply chain are telling us about component order reductions, the 3rd and 4th quarters will see a steeper drop off than we’ve seen for prior flagships.
This doesn’t surprise me at all as I’ve always thought it’s priced too high for mass adoption.
Apple overestimated what price point they could get away with and have had to reduce their forecasts.
The suppliers have no reason to give their investors bad news.
But the claims of lack of success in this thread have been about iPhone X so far, not the future.
That’s a decent point.
I was looking at where the X appears it’s going to end up overall compared to previous flagships.
Ah, after the initial topic is shot down by reports from Apple, it now must be the second half of the product’s lifetime where it will fail.
Not sure why there would be much of an expectation of some serious market share change at this time in the industry. The X wasn't expected to be something totally revolutionary, as far as I can see, like the original iPhone was when it came out, or even like the iPad when that came out, especially not at this point in time when various competitors are really competing, iPhones and other phones are better and lasting longer with technology being somewhat more mature, and when Apple themselves put out other new models at the same time that people would also be getting.Looking at it in isolation the X did perform very well. Best selling model in apple line up etc.
In the bigger picture, imo it did not perform. X is a major review of iPhone and by right it should help boost Apple market share (or at least regain share it lost over the years) but it didn't do much of that.
X performance was mediocre to say the least compared to last major update when apple released the big screen iPhone 6. At that time apple snatched big share even with the relative very expensive price compared to other phones (similar to X pricing compared to others now)
Btw: didn't analysts predicted X to sell 40-50 mil Q1 quarter before it was released?
Not sure why there would be much of an expectation of some serious market share change at this time in the industry. The X wasn't expected to be something totally revolutionary . . .
While I'm not even sure about that, even that is really more along the lines of evolutionary at best these days.It's the first near full screen iPhone ever . . .
On one hand we can’t trust analysts and on the other we can? If those figures were to be trusted it does show that neither model really dominated though, it’s a very watered down line up where they’ve all taken their share of the iPhone market. It’s no wonder 2017 iPhones are few and far between in public.Analysts 'Strategy Analytics' stated after the report that Apple last quarter flogged 16m iPhone X's compared to 12.5m iPhone8's and 8.3m 8+'s.
I didn’t, the title of this thread isn’t ‘failed’, it’s it isn’t that ‘successful’, and you can measure success how ever you want.
I Would say the bolded in your post is more of a broad generalization. Success is usually measured by a metric of some form or another and how it was achieved. You _can’t_just say the iPhone X can be measured ‘However you want. ‘
How many phones has a phone like this though? maybe the china built phones. Nobody else has no chin in most marketsWhile I'm not even sure about that, even that is really more along the lines of evolutionary at best these days.
Phone sales decline over time? You don’t say. I can’t think of a phone that increased in sales as it got older. This is tech we are talking about.You stated in a post just before this one that Cook cannot, “sound off” well the same applies to the spokespeople of their suppliers who have told investors that Apple has significantly reduced orders for the next 2 quarters.
Tim Cook was very careful with his wording when he described the X as the best selling so far and he made absolutely no future predictions about it which is a little odd considering it remains their flagship until September.
The X had a good first quarter and a lesser, although still better than expected, 2nd quarter.
Based upon what the supply chain are telling us about component order reductions, the 3rd and 4th quarters will see a steeper drop off than we’ve seen for prior flagships.
This doesn’t surprise me at all as I’ve always thought it’s priced too high for mass adoption.
Apple overestimated what price point they could get away with and have had to reduce their forecasts.
The suppliers have no reason to give their investors bad news.
The iPhone X is the best selling iPhone of all time in units sold by this point in its life. So what are you even talking about?Indeed and Apple has never made clear what there intentions were with the X. It’s sold better than expected for its niche market I’d say and Apple are continuing to make huge sums of money due to the popularity of their products and heavy markups.
I don’t think the X was ever intended to capture the mainstream market and indeed hasn’t, but it obviously has appeal to part of the market. I just think Apple need to remember most of their customers are buying the 6S, 7 and 8 variants combined so there is scope there to give these consumers something to be excited about this year as well as being proud of their flagship. Minimal revisions of old designs is getting a bit long in the tooth in 2018.
So, the fact it outsold every other iPhone last quarter apparently means nothing to you. What it have to do to appease you, outsell ALL the other phones combined? Sheesh....
Since when you become this uber successful investor with this much wisdom?
You not even knowing who Warren Buffet is, pretty much limits your option to the 'sure bud' realm.
Nowhere in the macrumors article does it specifically says Apple has cut orders. This article is from January and the author assumes that is what the affected manufacturers are claiming. Pretty weak evidence I would say.
Analysts 'Strategy Analytics' stated after the report that Apple last quarter flogged 16m iPhone X's compared to 12.5m iPhone8's and 8.3m 8+'s.
Indeed and Apple has never made clear what there intentions were with the X. It’s sold better than expected for its niche market I’d say and Apple are continuing to make huge sums of money due to the popularity of their products and heavy markups.
I don’t think the X was ever intended to capture the mainstream market and indeed hasn’t, but it obviously has appeal to part of the market. I just think Apple need to remember most of their customers are buying the 6S, 7 and 8 variants combined so there is scope there to give these consumers something to be excited about this year as well as being proud of their flagship. Minimal revisions of old designs is getting a bit long in the tooth in 2018.
That’s a hell of a claim, have you got proof of that? The iPhone 5 and 6 has huge popularity when realised and I don’t believe the X can possibly compete at double the price. It may have made the most profit for Apple but it’s one of 8 devices currently in their line up and total sales are down on even a year ago and that’s with more models available.The iPhone X is the best selling iPhone of all time in units sold by this point in its life. So what are you even talking about?
Yeah I’m not quite sure about it being the best selling iPhone of all time. I think it’s only the best selling from nov until the end of March.That’s a hell of a claim, have you got proof of that? The iPhone 5 and 6 has huge popularity when realised and I don’t believe the X can possibly compete at double the price. It may have made the most profit for Apple but it’s one of 8 devices currently in their line up and total sales are down on even a year ago and that’s with more models available.
The iPhone X would need to have sold around 90m units by this point to be the single best selling model in their history. Analysts are suggesting 16m for this last quarter. I think you’re way off.
I think the 6 plus was the best selling phone of all time? given the change in size...unless i was mistaken
Really? Where? News to me...?
Yeah I’m not quite sure about it being the best selling iPhone of all time. I think it’s only the best selling from nov until the end of March.
You’re out of touch. Go back a few years, walk into an Apple store and the choice was this years model or last year’s model at a lowered price. Walk in now and you have 2015’s iPhone still on sale nearly three years later. The pace of development has slowed and mass market consumers are not seeing enough differentiation between the flagship and the budget older model to part with the extra cash. Sales of all iPhone models will increase over time as their price point falls into the range that most people consider reasonable.Phone sales decline over time? You don’t say. I can’t think of a phone that increased in sales as it got older. This is tech we are talking about
Phone sales decline over time? You don’t say. I can’t think of a phone that increased in sales as it got older. This is tech we are talking about.