If they use a Samsung, the camera would probably be out of this world.If it is Samsung I wouldn't buy.
If they use a Samsung, the camera would probably be out of this world.If it is Samsung I wouldn't buy.
If they use a Samsung, the camera would probably be out of this world.
I don't find it that important for my needs either, but the Nexus line is constantly knocked for its camera. The current generation is the first to minimize the number of compromises. It would be awesome to see the Nexus line do something really special.That's nothing I find important, but you're probably right.
I don't find it that important for my needs either, but the Nexus line is constantly knocked for its camera. The current generation is the first to minimize the number of compromises. It would be awesome to see the Nexus line do something really special.
IMHO, the Nexus 5 is the greatest Android phone when adjusted for history. The Nexus 6P is up there, but LG really nailed the hardware on the Nexus 5 from a design standpoint.I got my Nexus 5 about 6 weeks ago now and IMHO it is special because it's the most flexible phone out there. No the battery life isn't special and no the camera isn't special there is nothing a reviewer can point to objectively and say THIS is the reason to buy a Nexus but that doesn't make it not special.
I'd rank it a tie with the 6p. Design and size of the nexus 5 was wonderful, as was the cost. Unfortunately I never could get good reception with that phone, and its declined to keep it.IMHO, the Nexus 5 is the greatest Android phone when adjusted for history. The Nexus 6P is up there, but LG really nailed the hardware on the Nexus 5 from a design standpoint.
This is my assessment as well. I would call the 6p and 5 even as the Nexus 5 was the first serious Nexus at a great price and the Nexus 6P is the first great Premium Nexus device.I'd rank it a tie with the 6p. Design and size of the nexus 5 was wonderful, as was the cost. Unfortunately I never could get good reception with that phone, and its declined to keep it.
I think, for a large screen phone, the nexus 6p is very well design. The features (fingerprint, front speakers) power, camera, screen quality, and battery life favor the 6p. The cost is reasonable, though the nexus 5 a down right bargain. I am enjoying my 60 more than any iOS or Android device before it.
All in all I think it's a tie, with the worst nexus going to either the galaxy nexus or nexus 6. I like my nexus 6, and kept it for a good while, but price alone killed it in the rankings.
I am convinced a Pixel phone would be killer.
Absolutely.This is my assessment as well. I would call the 6p and 5 even as the Nexus 5 was the first serious Nexus at a great price and the Nexus 6P is the first great Premium Nexus device.
For me, the Nexus 4 does poorly in the "adjusted for time" test. The Nexus 4 was a great device with a GIANT compromise (No LTE. At that point, even Apple had LTE). The Nexus One and Nexus S were both pretty good. Agreed on the Galaxy Nexus as the worst.
I'm just guessing here, I can't quite remember. Galaxy Nexus was ICS, which was when Holo was introduced. I would agree. When Holo was introduced, iOS was in the aging Forestall first Gen iOS look. Holo was such a breath of fresh air on ICS.Absolutely.
I bought the galaxy nexus used, and sold it two weeks later. That is when Android started to over take iOS software wise, IMO, but that phone was poor.
That is correct.I'm just guessing here, I can't quite remember. Galaxy Nexus was ICS, which was when Holo was introduced. I would agree. When Holo was introduced, iOS was in the aging Forestall first Gen iOS look. Holo was such a breath of fresh air on ICS.
Agreed on all counts. It really makes me want a Pixel phone, because the mobile OS is so advanced, I want Google to spec out a phone completely internally.That is correct.
Holo was introduced, while jelly beans refined performance with project butter, etc.
Similar to the lollipop to marshmallow. Which, IMO, Marshmallow the best mobile OS ever created up to this point.
Yeah, the tabs look nice. Waiting for a new 10" Note though, hasn't been updated in 2 years.A new nexus 7 would be great , though it's too small for my taste. I recently swapped my iPad air 2 for the galaxy tab s2 (love it, glad I made the change)...so 9.7 continues to be the sweet spot for me. The weight of the s2 makes it perfect.
Anyway, I'm sure htc could do fine, but I'm just as happy if they keep the current maker. The 6p is a great piece of hardware.
I wasn't a fan of the Nexus 7. It was a little more portable than a tablet and a little more productive than a phone, sure, but it was way less portable than a phone and way less productive than a tablet. It just wasn't a good blend at all.
I say ditch that, make a good size tablet, maybe something similar to the iPad Mini. This is a necessity, especially since most tablet manufacturers have moved to the 4:3 aspect ratio.
There are no plans to build a successor to Google's Nexus 5 or Nexus 5X phones, according to a spokesman for the Korean electronics conglomerate.
"LG needs to focus on its own brand," he said at the Mobile World Congress trade show in Barcelona on Friday.
This is my assessment as well. I would call the 6p and 5 even as the Nexus 5 was the first serious Nexus at a great price and the Nexus 6P is the first great Premium Nexus device.
For me, the Nexus 4 does poorly in the "adjusted for time" test. The Nexus 4 was a great device with a GIANT compromise (No LTE. At that point, even Apple had LTE). The Nexus One and Nexus S were both pretty good. Agreed on the Galaxy Nexus as the worst.
See this I don't understand from people that complain about TW. They say stock Android is better and consumes less resources. Yet you just said in order to get great battery life from the 6P you have to unlock the BL and flash a custom kernel/rom! Makes no senses to me. If Tw is what is holding the Galaxy line back.....what is holding the 6P and stock Android back? I mean shouldn't the 6P with stock be getting rediculous battery life on it's own? It doesn't have TW holding it back so to speak.People are getting crazy (like 7+ SOT hours) battery life supposedly with custom kernels over at XDA. So it does seem possible. Stock 6p and kernel for me though (typical 4 hrs SOT, but never ran out of battery even on travel days). I am just finding the stock experience perfect (came from 2 years of iOS) and don't really want to fool with it.
The new Galaxies are sexy as hell, but I don't think the revision of the 810 in the 6P and the 820 will be all that different. And I don't want a smaller phone with Touchwiz. I love Android too much.
Camera sounds better, but the 6P is the best I have ever had on a phone, so I am content. Now the Note 6 could tempt me . At least for that , Touchwiz add some cool functionality.
See this I don't understand from people that complain about TW. They say stock Android is better and consumes less resources. Yet you just said in order to get great battery life from the 6P you have to unlock the BL and flash a custom kernel/rom! Makes no senses to me. If Tw is what is holding the Galaxy line back.....what is holding the 6P and stock Android back? I mean shouldn't the 6P with stock be getting rediculous battery life on it's own? It doesn't have TW holding it back so to speak.
See this I don't understand from people that complain about TW. They say stock Android is better and consumes less resources. Yet you just said in order to get great battery life from the 6P you have to unlock the BL and flash a custom kernel/rom! Makes no senses to me. If Tw is what is holding the Galaxy line back.....what is holding the 6P and stock Android back? I mean shouldn't the 6P with stock be getting rediculous battery life on it's own? It doesn't have TW holding it back so to speak.