*******What Apple did in 2012 was downright highway robbery. I paid $1800 for my Macbook 4,1 in October of 2008, only to find out in early 2012, that APple had deemed a 3 and a bit year old computer obsolete. We're not talking cheap products here, I had to really really stretch to get my Macbook. Apple dropped it faster than a sac of potatoes and intended or not, it was a stunning example of apple prematurely obsoleting products. Apple is a rich rich rich company so it would not have killed them to be environmentally friendly and customer friendly to have supported these machines a bit longer. I applaud them for things like supporting the iPad 2 and 4S in iOS 9 and also for the long support given to certain 2007 and 2008 Macs, but that does not excuse them for everything.
Kudos does go to Microsoft who have barely changed the system requirements since Vista? in 2006 - you need 1 GB instead of 512MB but thats easily rectifiable, and the clock speed requirement has only risen 200MHZ. My 2008 Macbook white runs Windows 10 better than it runs OSX Lion, despite Windows 10 being current and Lion being released only 3 years after my laptop came out. Ironic when Microsoft gives better support for Macs than Apple can.
I must agree that in this case you are in part right, but I do not believe you are considering all the factors in your judgment.
Apple should have searched for a way to overcome the 32 bit boot matter, the reason why your MB (which I also have) stopped with OSX 10.7 and could not be updated over Lion.
However, although I cannot prove it, I believe that it was not to make on purpose 32 bit booting Macs obsolete in order to force the owners to buy new computers.
They did not took that matter as seriously as they should have done it.
However, as you probably know from other threads in this forum, a group of developers to be found not only in those threads in this forum, but directly in the web under OSX Hackers.net, have created 2 tools allowing so called "unsupported" Macs as your MB 4.1 to be updated to newer versions of OSX.
One is called "Extractor" which I tried but did not work for me.
The other tool (much easier to use since almost automatic working) called "MacPostFactor" (MCPF) should be (hopefully) soon released in version 2.
With the version 1.0.1 of MCPF I managed in my MB 4.1 to upgrade up to Mavericks and not further.
Maybe the second issue of that tool might allow to go even to newer OSX, who knows?
As to Windows 10, it works also in my MB 4.1, installed using BootCamp.
But I cannot say that Lion doesn't work fine as well.
The fact that Microsoft still requests on its side not much more of resources to install newer Windows versions is only half of the entire truth.
Read this true story to understand why I say so.
I bought at about the same period in which you bought your MB 4.1, a rather expensive Acer 17" Windows notebook for my son.
I could presently install newer Windows issues than the "XP" or the "Vista" with which it was sold new. Microsoft would let me do so
However...the components have no newer drivers for its most important built-in parts, for instance the web cam or the wi fi card, than those for XP ot Vista.
Therefore that Acer notebook is presently much more "obsolete" than my MacBook 4.1.
As you found out by yourself Apple delivers through BootCamp working drivers for your MB4.1 allowing to use it with present Windows, although Apple makes no benefit whatsoever for that.
Since neither Microsoft nor Acer would earn any money by making the needed drivers for older Windows computers in order to make them fit for newer Windows, those drivers will never exist!
So I am myself neither so willing to give Microsoft kudos as you are... nor to declare Apple as guilty of willing to create planned obsolence.
Ed
Last edited: