No chance. Parallels isn't an emulator. Nor is VMware Fusion, for that matter. Apple has also pretty much stated that they're only supporting hypervisor functionality (which is what VMware Fusion and Parallels Desktop are going to be doing on Apple Silicon) and not emulating another architecture like was done on Virtual PC in the PowerPC days.Can't wait to learn about its performance and abilities, also if there is any chance to run win10 for (from) intel.
Thank you and waiting for your impressions.
So, ARM64 OSes are what you have to work with here.
There's an ARM64 version of Ubuntu Desktop?! I thought there was only the version of it for Ubuntu Server...?So I have now tried:
None of which are accepted by the installer.
- Ubuntu 20.10 Desktop
- Ubuntu 20.04 Desktop
- Ubuntu 20.04 Server (with ARM support)
- Debian - ARM64 ISO
Nope. Likely not happening. Certainly not from Parallels or VMware.I was hoping for a kind of emulation...
With the M1's extra speed I was hoping that it would be fine...
They're not going to do x86 emulation. That's an uphill climb and it's looking like Windows 10 for ARM64 will suffice for the vast majority of Mac uses once Microsoft finally starts playing ball here.It may well come, as the post said on Parallels, this is their first release, it's early, it's buggy and it's anything but feature complete. I'm paraphrasing of course, because I can't be bothered copy & pasting
There is an ARM64 native version of the Office apps for Windows. You shouldn't need to install the x86 nor the x64 versions. Though Teams might still be an exception to this.Interestingly The current Build of Windows won't let me install Office 64 bit. Says I can't run 64 bit apps. I thought that they said that this build was the first one to have support for 64 bit. But it does not seem like it.
Are you on Build 21277? 64bit emulation does not present until build 21277.
By the way, isn't there a arm64 native office on Windows?
There is ARM64 native Office. One should not have to install either the x86 nor x64 versions of Office for Windows. Again, I think it might still be lacking in an ARM64 native version of Teams, but I know that's definitely in development.
Here is the funny fact: these apps are 32bit arm apps.
I don't believe that's accurate. Though, I welcome proof to the contrary.
Another fact: Apple M1 is an arm64 exclusive processor(no 32-bit compatibility mode)
This is definitely accurate. Though, I believe that 32-bit x86 Windows application execution is translated to ARM64 directly, making it work okay on Windows 10 for ARM64 on ARM systems (such as Apple Silicon Macs) that lack 32-bit ARM instruction sets. (After all, even ARM is removing ARM32 instruction sets from their designs in the next couple of years, so 32-bit ARM is nearing a dead-end imminently.)
The result: the apps you mentioned cannot run without something like Rosetta.
Rosetta doesn't translate from 32-bit to 64-bit. If it did, Catalina's dropping of 32-bit Intel binary support wouldn't have been so devastating. Just one architecture to another (e.g. PowerPC to Intel; Intel to Apple Silicon)
If they detect a bunch of people running Windows on Parallels Arm, someone in Redmond might take the hint that there would be demand for it.
Even before Parallels put out this preview, I would imagine that talks between Apple and Microsoft were on-going about this. I've said it a ton of times before and I'll keep saying it: Windows 10 for ARM64 running on Apple Silicon has massive benefits for both Apple and Microsoft. Apple gets to keep saying that Windows runs just fine on the Mac for those that need it and Microsoft finally gets a slew of ARM64 users to help build popularity of Windows 10 for ARM64.
Do I think Microsoft will work out a deal to make it so that Windows 10 for ARM64 can run on a Mac (either via Virtualization or direct booting)? Absolutely. They stand way too much to gain by doing it to not do it, considering they want Windows 10 for ARM64 to eventually succeed and the current state of affairs (weak Qualcomm-based SoCs and a very small selection of devices and form factors) otherwise doesn't allow for that. Having Apple Silicon Macs, let alone VMs on them, is such a huge shot in the ARM (yes, pun intended) for them, that it's hard to ignore.Parallels took the time to develop drivers for Windows 10 on ARM for Parallels Desktop, despite the only way to acquire Windows 10 on ARM is through the Insider Program.
Does anyone think Microsoft will work out a deal for buying a virtualized copy linked to a VMware and Parallels account, or does Parallels see Windows 10 on ARM as just for developers using a Mac?
Is Skyrim x86 or x64? That's awesome that emulated performance in Microsoft's Rosetta 2 like emulator enables games like that to be playable. Gives hope that this might not be as subpar (compared to the experience of virtualizing and/or native booting Windows on an Intel Mac) as I initially feared it would be.I am not having to uninstall/reinstall tools or anything. Skyrim runs at playable frame rates too.
View attachment 1696792