Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

666sheep

macrumors 68040
Dec 7, 2009
3,686
292
Poland
Lot's of reports of recent SYBA/IO-Crest cards not working. I'd get the money back and try to get a SSD7101A-1.

I got one of recent ones and it's working perfectly with 970 EVO (boot drive) and HP EX950 (data). Solid 2400/2900 W/R from HP, didn't bother with measuring 970, but I could if someone's interested.
 

trifero

macrumors 68030
May 21, 2009
2,958
2,796
I got one of recent ones and it's working perfectly with 970 EVO (boot drive) and HP EX950 (data). Solid 2400/2900 W/R from HP, didn't bother with measuring 970, but I could if someone's interested.
Maybe they have fixed the change they made? First ones worked like a charm. Then, something was changed, lots of reports that were not working.
 

Gr1f

macrumors regular
Oct 1, 2009
160
29
Just for fun as I wait for a decent price for a Highpoint (still ~€540 here ) card I striped 2 x Sabrent Rocket 1T NVMs just using the 2 cheap Sabrent PCIe adapters.

Pretty impressive
Screenshot 2021-01-15 at 16.00.03.png


As I'm using this for primarily scratch disk for After Effects and Photoshop I set the Chuck Size to 128k....think that's what I should have done? Default was 32k and I don't do lots of DB work.., so.
 

Lance Nanek

macrumors member
Jun 23, 2020
31
5
Finally exceeded the speed on the internal slot today with my cheap used parts RAID today! Blackmagic benchmarks:

MacPro 6,1 -> ST-NGFF2013-C NGFF M.2 PCIe SSD Card -> Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus = 1216.9 MB/s / 1300.9 MB/s
MacPro 6,1 -> OWC Mercury Helios TB2 -> HLT NGFF M.2 Adapter -> LITEON EP1-KB480 AHCI SSD = 746.3 MB/s / 492.0 MB/s
MacPro 6,1 -same bus-> 2 x OWC Mercury Helios TB2 -> 2 x HLT NGFF M.2 Adapter -> 2 x LITEON EP1-KB480 AHCI SSD = 1050.3 MB/s / 731.2 MB/s
MacPro 6,1 -different buses-> 2 x OWC Mercury Helios TB2 -> 2 x HLT NGFF M.2 Adapter -> 2 x LITEON EP1-KB480 AHCI SSD = 1350.5 MB/s / 933.2 MB/s
MacPro 6,1 -different buses-> 3 x OWC Mercury Helios TB2 -> 3 x HLT NGFF M.2 Adapter -> 3 x LITEON EP1-KB480 AHCI SSD = 1816.2 MB/s / 1339.2 MB/s

On a side note, I stupidly bought some Samsung PM981 SSDs and they are useless. Lock up doing pretty much anything. Unfortunately, they don't seem to get Samsung's various firmware updates that Samsung makes available for their consumer line like the 2B2QEXM7 firmware update for the SSD 970 EVO Plus that fixed a lot of Mac issues. I was reading up on Apple OEM drives and saw they were often by Samsung, so thought any Samsung would work, but Samsung has apparently used 4 or 5 different controllers for various SSD products and an OEM part made for Lenovo/HP/Dell will likely never get a firmware update needed for a Mac.
 

Attachments

  • benchmark_bus_1_2_3_liteon_raid_blackmagic.png
    benchmark_bus_1_2_3_liteon_raid_blackmagic.png
    246.7 KB · Views: 142
  • rocket_benchmark.png
    rocket_benchmark.png
    301.8 KB · Views: 141

dmMacRumors

macrumors newbie
Jan 23, 2021
4
0
Finally exceeded the speed on the internal slot today with my cheap used parts RAID today! Blackmagic benchmarks:

MacPro 6,1 -> ST-NGFF2013-C NGFF M.2 PCIe SSD Card -> Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus = 1216.9 MB/s / 1300.9 MB/s
MacPro 6,1 -> OWC Mercury Helios TB2 -> HLT NGFF M.2 Adapter -> LITEON EP1-KB480 AHCI SSD = 746.3 MB/s / 492.0 MB/s
MacPro 6,1 -same bus-> 2 x OWC Mercury Helios TB2 -> 2 x HLT NGFF M.2 Adapter -> 2 x LITEON EP1-KB480 AHCI SSD = 1050.3 MB/s / 731.2 MB/s
MacPro 6,1 -different buses-> 2 x OWC Mercury Helios TB2 -> 2 x HLT NGFF M.2 Adapter -> 2 x LITEON EP1-KB480 AHCI SSD = 1350.5 MB/s / 933.2 MB/s
MacPro 6,1 -different buses-> 3 x OWC Mercury Helios TB2 -> 3 x HLT NGFF M.2 Adapter -> 3 x LITEON EP1-KB480 AHCI SSD = 1816.2 MB/s / 1339.2 MB/s

On a side note, I stupidly bought some Samsung PM981 SSDs and they are useless. Lock up doing pretty much anything. Unfortunately, they don't seem to get Samsung's various firmware updates that Samsung makes available for their consumer line like the 2B2QEXM7 firmware update for the SSD 970 EVO Plus that fixed a lot of Mac issues. I was reading up on Apple OEM drives and saw they were often by Samsung, so thought any Samsung would work, but Samsung has apparently used 4 or 5 different controllers for various SSD products and an OEM part made for Lenovo/HP/Dell will likely never get a firmware update needed for a Mac.
Did you finally get your Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus, to boot on your MBP?
I've been considering buying that for a MBP 2015 with PCI3.0 which is a little upgrade from your PCI2.0
 

paulcons

macrumors 6502
Apr 3, 2017
250
147
New York City
Back in the beginning of this thread, the Riptide adapter <https://www.riitop.com/products/pci...m-key-2230-2242-2260-2280mm-ssd-with-heatsink> was listed as compatible. VERY cost conscious card! From everything I have read, with a decent blade (like a 970 EVO Samsung) it should get into the 1500 range for i/o in a 4 lane PCI slot in a 2010 cMP (5,1, 140.0.0 bootrom).

HOWEVER, one thing the manufacturer says gave me pause. "Mac Pro 2009, 2010 and 2012 models support PCIe-AHCI SSD only." Is not AHCI and older, slower interface than MVMe? One that was designed for spinners? Most of the "blades" everyone is talking about are NVMe ones. AND this particular card is called a NVMe adapter. AND another tidbit from the manufacturer "DO NOT support PCI-e M Key AHCI SSD." Seems it is saying this card does NOT work with my cMP UNLESS I get a "M.2 AHCI blade..." which the card does not support??

What am I missing here?
 

Macschrauber

macrumors 68030
Dec 27, 2015
2,981
1,487
Germany
They talk about ahci blades as not every mac pro has a compatible OS nor a compatible firmware.

as all low cost adapters are passive I wouldn’t mind what they write.
 

marzer

macrumors 65816
Nov 14, 2009
1,404
135
Colorado
Back in the beginning of this thread, the Riptide adapter <https://www.riitop.com/products/pci...m-key-2230-2242-2260-2280mm-ssd-with-heatsink> was listed as compatible. VERY cost conscious card! From everything I have read, with a decent blade (like a 970 EVO Samsung) it should get into the 1500 range for i/o in a 4 lane PCI slot in a 2010 cMP (5,1, 140.0.0 bootrom).

HOWEVER, one thing the manufacturer says gave me pause. "Mac Pro 2009, 2010 and 2012 models support PCIe-AHCI SSD only." Is not AHCI and older, slower interface than MVMe? One that was designed for spinners? Most of the "blades" everyone is talking about are NVMe ones. AND this particular card is called a NVMe adapter. AND another tidbit from the manufacturer "DO NOT support PCI-e M Key AHCI SSD." Seems it is saying this card does NOT work with my cMP UNLESS I get a "M.2 AHCI blade..." which the card does not support??

What am I missing here?
Most manufacturers will not claim support for newer unsupported configurations like Catalina or Big Sur, many don't even acknowledge the Mojave capability on a cMP. I use the RIITOP adapter under Big Sur, it works fine on my 2012 cMP with an NVMe SSD. I like it for the cost and size, wasn't interested in spending the $$ on a x8 or 16 interface since my machine is only for home use. It fits nicely in the number 2 slot above my RX 580 without blocking the fans (I used a small strip of foam tape on the adapter's underside to maintain a comfortable spacing between the two devices). And it runs the expected x4 speed of 1500-1600MB/s, which is why I bought a cheap 1TB NVMe rated at those speeds, saving even more money.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndStreet

joevt

macrumors 604
Jun 21, 2012
6,967
4,262
HOWEVER, one thing the manufacturer says gave me pause. "Mac Pro 2009, 2010 and 2012 models support PCIe-AHCI SSD only." Is not AHCI and older, slower interface than MVMe? One that was designed for spinners? Most of the "blades" everyone is talking about are NVMe ones. AND this particular card is called a NVMe adapter. AND another tidbit from the manufacturer "DO NOT support PCI-e M Key AHCI SSD." Seems it is saying this card does NOT work with my cMP UNLESS I get a "M.2 AHCI blade..." which the card does not support??
cMP didn't have the firmware to boot NVMe natively, but the NVMe efi driver can be added to the firmware or to the Driver#### list or it can be loaded by a boot loader before the boot loader boots macOS.
The latest firmware for 2009, 2010, 2012 Mac Pros does boot NVMe - so maybe they wrote that before the new firmware existed.

Where does it say "DO NOT support PCI-e M Key AHCI SSD."? It's PCIe so it should work. The product page says "Support Key-M M.2 NVME or AHCI SSD".
 

Lance Nanek

macrumors member
Jun 23, 2020
31
5
Did you finally get your Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus, to boot on your MBP?
I've been considering buying that for a MBP 2015 with PCI3.0 which is a little upgrade from your PCI2.0
Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus runs fine on the internal slot in Mac Pro 6,1 with the Sintech-C adapter and Catalina OS. Showing x4 5.0 GT/s which is as fast as it gets on this machine (PCIe 2.0).

Returned the Sabrent Rocket 4 I was trying to get running in an OWC Mercury Helios Thunderbolt 2 enclosure. Never got it to run more than x4 2.5 GT/s there (PCIe 1.0). Ran fine at x4 8.0 GT/s in a Glortrends Thunderbolt 3 enclosure. So I imagine you would get that speed with PCIe 3.0.
 

Lance Nanek

macrumors member
Jun 23, 2020
31
5
Interesting arrival from China today:

Mac Pro 6,1 -> Apple Thunderbolt 2 to 3 Adapter -> JEYI ThunderDock -> Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus 1TB = 1217.8MB/s | 1287.7 MB/s
Mac Pro 6,1 -> Apple Thunderbolt 2 to 3 Adapter -> JEYI ThunderDock -> XPG SX8200 Pro 256GB = 382.6 MB/s | 1259.1 MB/s

Much cheaper and more compact than my previous Kensington SD5000T + Glortrends Thunderbolt 3 Enclosure approach with nearly the same speed. The adapter can't power a bus powered enclosure, so normally needs an extra dock, but the JEYI has a PD input.
 

Attachments

  • JEYI-Rocket_4_Plus_benchmark.png
    JEYI-Rocket_4_Plus_benchmark.png
    220.8 KB · Views: 142
  • JEYI_ADATA_SX8200_benchmark.png
    JEYI_ADATA_SX8200_benchmark.png
    223.6 KB · Views: 125

cosmichobo

macrumors 6502a
May 4, 2006
986
604
Has anyone tried this card from China? "Debroglie" brand?


Will I be getting what I pay for? ie sub US$50... No mention of speeds in the description. AliExpress has the same card, with feedback saying it "just works", bootable... (of course, we can all trust reviews online)

Any improvement over it being in the normal drive bays? Worse?
 

joevt

macrumors 604
Jun 21, 2012
6,967
4,262

Will I be getting what I pay for? ie sub US$50... No mention of speeds in the description. AliExpress has the same card, with feedback saying it "just works", bootable... (of course, we can all trust reviews online)

Any improvement over it being in the normal drive bays? Worse?
MacPro5,1 drive bays are SATA II (3 Gb/s).
If this is SATA III (6 Gbps) then it will be faster for SSDs (up to 450 MB/s? since this is only a PCIe x1 card) but not faster for HDs.
It doesn't say what chip it uses.
It won't be useful for RAID since the card is only x1.
it can't give max performance to an SSD since the card is only x1.
 

dmMacRumors

macrumors newbie
Jan 23, 2021
4
0
Interesting arrival from China today:

Mac Pro 6,1 -> Apple Thunderbolt 2 to 3 Adapter -> JEYI ThunderDock -> Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus 1TB = 1217.8MB/s | 1287.7 MB/s
Mac Pro 6,1 -> Apple Thunderbolt 2 to 3 Adapter -> JEYI ThunderDock -> XPG SX8200 Pro 256GB = 382.6 MB/s | 1259.1 MB/s

Much cheaper and more compact than my previous Kensington SD5000T + Glortrends Thunderbolt 3 Enclosure approach with nearly the same speed. The adapter can't power a bus powered enclosure, so normally needs an extra dock, but the JEYI has a PD input.
Looks like a 10Gbps connection at TB1 speeds, but TBH I'm not experienced with thunderbolt and only just starting to look at that. It would be real nice if you could pull 20Gbps speeds.

Did you update the Apple adaptors firmware? On my searching, I found this tidbit buried in one manufactures description:
  1. If you have access to a Thunderbolt 3 Mac, the next time you update the OS, make sure the TB3 to TB2 adapter is connected to your computer, so that the firmware of the adapter can be updated simultaneously.
I have a question about the device as their description sucks, but does that usb 3.1 port work seamlessly bidirectional where you can plug in a USB 3.1 drive and access it just like the internal nvme drive, via TB3, or does the USB 3.1 port just provide another access to the internal nvme via the USB 3.1? If it were a universal bidirectional hub, that would be cool.

Edit: just found a good article by Anandtech on the chipset in that dock ... https://www.anandtech.com/show/12228/intel-titan-ridge-thunderbolt-3
 
Last edited:

joevt

macrumors 604
Jun 21, 2012
6,967
4,262
Looks like a 10Gbps connection at TB1 speeds, but TBH I'm not experienced with thunderbolt and only just starting to look at that. It would be real nice if you could pull 20Gbps speeds.
400 MB/s is near the top end of USB 3.0.
500 MB/s is beyond top end of USB 3.0.
750 MB/s is near the top end of Thunderbolt 1 speed.
1000 MB/s is near the top end of USB 3.1 gen 2.
1200 MB/s means at least Thunderbolt 2 speed (up to ≈1600 MB/s).
Thunderbolt 3 speed is expected to start at 2000 MB/s.
The in-between speeds cannot be used to make a definitive conclusion on the connection type.
20 Gbps is definitely beyond Thunderbolt 2 speed.


Did you update the Apple adaptors firmware? On my searching, I found this tidbit buried in one manufactures description:
  1. If you have access to a Thunderbolt 3 Mac, the next time you update the OS, make sure the TB3 to TB2 adapter is connected to your computer, so that the firmware of the adapter can be updated simultaneously.
Haven't heard about the adapter having a firmware to be updated. Is there a link to more info about that? Does the adapter info even appear anywhere in macOS or ioreg?

I have a question about the device as their description sucks, but does that usb 3.1 port work seamlessly bidirectional where you can plug in a USB 3.1 drive and access it just like the internal nvme drive, via TB3, or does the USB 3.1 port just provide another access to the internal nvme via the USB 3.1? If it were a universal bidirectional hub, that would be cool.

Edit: just found a good article by Anandtech on the chipset in that dock ... https://www.anandtech.com/show/12228/intel-titan-ridge-thunderbolt-3
The USB 3.1 gen 2 port is a separate USB port connected to the USB 3.1 gen 2 controller of the Titan Ridge chip in the JEYI. That USB controller is not connected to the NVMe. That USB controller will appear as a separate USB 3.1 Bus in the USB section of System Information.app. It can connect USB 3.x and USB 2.0 (and earlier) devices. The JEYI does not have a USB to NVMe chip to support non-Thunderbolt hosts (the ACASIS has a JMS583 for when its Thunderbolt controller cannot be used).
 

Lance Nanek

macrumors member
Jun 23, 2020
31
5
joevt is right. You should think of this JEYI as a Thunderbolt dock that happens to have a NVME slot. The only connection back to the computer is Thunderbolt 3. That's the only access to the NVME. In system diagnostics it looks like:
Code:
Thunderbolt Bus 0:

  Vendor Name:    Apple Inc.
  Device Name:    Mac Pro
  UID:    0x0001000E01AD9E30
  Route String:    0
  Firmware Version:    19.2
  Domain UUID:    40645F84-4600-1250-88CB-7B3D297E2DCF
  Port:
  Status:    Device connected
  Link Status:    0x2
  Speed:    Up to 20 Gb/s x1
  Current Link Width:    0x2
  Receptacle:    6
  Cable Firmware Version:    1.0.16
  Cable Serial Number:    C4M032504FLF798AT
  Link Controller Firmware Version:    0.13.0
  Port:
  Status:    No device connected
  Link Status:    0x7
  Speed:    Up to 20 Gb/s x1
  Current Link Width:    0x1
  Receptacle:    5
  Link Controller Firmware Version:    0.13.0

Thunderbolt3 SSD Dock:

  Vendor Name:    Guangzhou JEYI Information Technology CO., LTD
  Device Name:    Thunderbolt3 SSD Dock
  Vendor ID:    0x265
  Device ID:    0x1
  Device Revision:    0x1
  UID:    0x02654DFC28085300
  Route String:    1
  Firmware Version:    59.1
  Port (Upstream):
  Status:    Device connected
  Link Status:    0x2
  Speed:    Up to 20 Gb/s x1
  Current Link Width:    0x2
  Cable Firmware Version:    1.0.16
  Cable Serial Number:    C4M032504FLF798AT
  Link Controller Firmware Version:    1.42.0
  Port:
  Status:    No device connected
  Link Status:    0x7
  Speed:    Up to 40 Gb/s x1
  Current Link Width:    0x1
  Link Controller Firmware Version:    1.42.0

If you plug a USB drive into it, you can use both the NVME drive and the USB drives at the same time, though. E.g. here's a 2GB USB key stuck in it:

Code:
pci8086,15f0:

  Type:    USB eXtensible Host Controller
  Driver Installed:    Yes
  Tunnel Compatible:    Yes
  Pause Compatible:    No
  MSI:    Yes
  Bus:    PCI
  Slot:    Thunderbolt@236,0,0
  Vendor ID:    0x8086
  Device ID:    0x15f0
  Revision ID:    0x0006
  Link Width:    x4
  Link Speed:    2.5 GT/s

USB 3.1 Bus:

  Host Controller Driver:    AppleUSBXHCITR
  PCI Device ID:    0x15f0 
  PCI Revision ID:    0x0006 
  PCI Vendor ID:    0x8086 

Mass Storage:

  Product ID:    0x6387
  Vendor ID:    0x058f  (Alcor Micro, Corp.)
  Version:    1.12
  Serial Number:    8C652D54
  Speed:    Up to 480 Mb/s
  Manufacturer:    Generic
  Location ID:    0x02100000 / 1
  Current Available (mA):    500
  Current Required (mA):    200
  Extra Operating Current (mA):    0
  Media:
Flash Disk:
  Capacity:    1.99 GB (1,993,342,976 bytes)
  Removable Media:    Yes
  BSD Name:    disk9
  Logical Unit:    0
  Partition Map Type:    MBR (Master Boot Record)
  S.M.A.R.T. status:    Verified
  USB Interface:    0
  Volumes:
USB_KEY:
  Capacity:    1.99 GB (1,989,558,272 bytes)
  Free:    1.95 GB (1,950,240,768 bytes)
  Writable:    Yes
  File System:    MS-DOS FAT32
  BSD Name:    disk9s1
  Mount Point:    /Volumes/USB_KEY
  Content:    DOS_FAT_32
  Volume UUID:    21398E5F-BEE2-3AE2-B206-39E7AF6BA1BB

Whereas the NVME drive looks like:

Code:
pci1987,5018:

  Type:    NVM Express Controller
  Driver Installed:    Yes
  Tunnel Compatible:    Yes
  Pause Compatible:    Yes
  MSI:    Yes
  Bus:    PCI
  Slot:    Thunderbolt@237,0,0
  Vendor ID:    0x1987
  Device ID:    0x5018
  Subsystem Vendor ID:    0x1987
  Subsystem ID:    0x5018
  Revision ID:    0x0001
  Serial Number:    6D12070B14A292137352
  Link Width:    x4
  Link Speed:    8.0 GT/s

Sabrent Rocket 4.0 Plus:

  Capacity:    1 TB (1,000,204,886,016 bytes)
  TRIM Support:    Yes
  Model:    Sabrent Rocket 4.0 Plus
  Revision:    RKT4P1.1
  Serial Number:    6D12070B14A292137352
  Link Width:    x4
  Link Speed:    8.0 GT/s
  Detachable Drive:    No
  BSD Name:    disk4
  Partition Map Type:    GPT (GUID Partition Table)
  Removable Media:    No
  S.M.A.R.T. status:    Verified
  Volumes:
EFI:
  Capacity:    209.7 MB (209,715,200 bytes)
  File System:    MS-DOS FAT32
  BSD Name:    disk4s1
  Content:    EFI
  Volume UUID:    0E239BC6-F960-3107-89CF-1C97F78BB46B
disk4s2:
  Capacity:    999.86 GB (999,860,912,128 bytes)
  BSD Name:    disk4s2
  Content:    Apple_RAID
Boot OS X:
  Capacity:    134.2 MB (134,217,728 bytes)
  File System:    Journaled HFS+
  BSD Name:    disk4s3
  Content:    Apple_Boot
  Volume UUID:    00F42A10-7C1D-3C9B-926F-31FE3C0853E8

Latest benchmark for my RAID array (APFS encrypted):
Mac Pro 6,1 ->
3 x Helios -> 3 x LITEON EP1-KB480
1 X JEYI -> Rocket 4 Plus 1TB
1 x SD5000T -> Glortrends -> SX8200 Pro 256GB
= 2,314.8 MB/s / 2,163.9 MB/s
 

Attachments

  • 20210130_081913.jpg
    20210130_081913.jpg
    308.6 KB · Views: 130
  • 20210130_081927.jpg
    20210130_081927.jpg
    318.8 KB · Views: 132
  • 20210130_081940.jpg
    20210130_081940.jpg
    269.5 KB · Views: 107
  • 20210130_081952.jpg
    20210130_081952.jpg
    313.6 KB · Views: 130
  • 20210130_082005.jpg
    20210130_082005.jpg
    225.4 KB · Views: 125
  • DiskSpeedTest.png
    DiskSpeedTest.png
    224.9 KB · Views: 127

beerstine

macrumors member
Jul 18, 2002
42
5
I'm attempting to install an Adata SX8200 with a Sintech adapter into my 2013 Mac Pro. My Boot ROM is 426.0.0.0 but the drive is not recognized for formatting by Disk Utility. Have ensured the blade and the adapter are properly seated but it is still not recognized. NVMExpress reports the computer doesn't have any NVMExpress devices.

Have tried booting from Catalina, a USB install drive with the Big Sur installer and Recovery mode. and it is not recognized by any of them.

Is this setup completely incompatible with the trashcan?
 
Last edited:

Lance Nanek

macrumors member
Jun 23, 2020
31
5
I'm attempting to install an Adata SX8200 with a Sintech adapter into my 2013 Mac Pro. My Boot ROM is 426.0.0.0 but the drive is not recognized for formatting by Disk Utility. Have ensured the blade and the adapter are properly seated but it is still not recognized. NVMExpress reports the computer doesn't have any NVMExpress devices.

Have tried booting from Catalina, a USB install drive with the Big Sur installer and Recovery mode. and it is not recognized by any of them.

Is this setup completely incompatible with the trashcan?
You mean the Sintech-c adapter, right? The one with the long carrier board? I tried the short one first myself with no luck either. Same boot rom here, Mac Pro Late 2013, so that's not your issue. Although I use a Sabrent Rocket 4, so can't speak for the boot-ability of an internal SX8200.
 

beerstine

macrumors member
Jul 18, 2002
42
5
You mean the Sintech-c adapter, right? The one with the long carrier board? I tried the short one first myself with no luck either. Same boot rom here, Mac Pro Late 2013, so that's not your issue. Although I use a Sabrent Rocket 4, so can't speak for the boot-ability of an internal SX8200.
It's the long board. NGFF M.2 nVME SSD adapter for 2013-2015 Macs. Bought off Amazon where it claims to support the SX8200. Could be a bad board but it sounds like you have a similar issue.
 

Lance Nanek

macrumors member
Jun 23, 2020
31
5
It's the long board. NGFF M.2 nVME SSD adapter for 2013-2015 Macs. Bought off Amazon where it claims to support the SX8200. Could be a bad board but it sounds like you have a similar issue.
Ah, long board works fine for me. You might want to try a drive from page 1 someone has tested already. I had to return 2-3 SSDs to amazon myself. The SX8200 Pro is listed, for example, but not non-pro.
 

beerstine

macrumors member
Jul 18, 2002
42
5
Disk Utility also fails to show the drive when I set it to show all devices.

My SSD is the SX8200 Pro which was reported compatible on Page 1 of the thread.
 

tsialex

Contributor
Jun 13, 2016
13,455
13,601
Disk Utility also fails to show the drive when I set it to show all devices.

My SSD is the SX8200 Pro which was reported compatible on Page 1 of the thread.
MP5,1/MP7,1 compatible, not MP6,1. Some blades simply don't work with adapters or when installed in a MP6,1. Always use the search to see if someone got it working with a MP6,1.
 

Lance Nanek

macrumors member
Jun 23, 2020
31
5
What a terrible model.
Yeah, I definitely regret trying to do anything with the internal slot on the MP6,1. The most I ever got out of it was 1216.9MB/s / 1300.9 MB/s blackmagic benchmark with a Sabrent Rocket 4.

Meanwhile my thunderbolt array is pulling 2314.8MB/s / 2163.9 MB/s. Anandtech's system charts do seem indicate the internal slot has much less bandwidth than the PCIe switch in front of the Thunderbolt buses. I suppose I could toss the internal slot into the array next. Or try putting an array on the internal slot via an Angelshark.

Other regret is going with NVME cards and blades in my OWC Helios enclosures. It's easy to get a dual blade SATA card for cheap, and cheap SATA blades. I could have just had twice as many SATA blades instead of half as many NVME blades, and probably been far more compatible. E.g.:
 

Attachments

  • MPsystemarch_north.png
    MPsystemarch_north.png
    53.4 KB · Views: 103
  • MPsystemarch_south.png
    MPsystemarch_south.png
    42.3 KB · Views: 120
  • Like
Reactions: trifero
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.