Gull @ Kawhia Beach, New Zealand
Fujifilm X20: ISO 100, f 8 @ 1/600 sec
Fujifilm X20: ISO 100, f 8 @ 1/600 sec
Call me crazy, but I can’t tell the difference on them. Your native Flickr shot does have more detail. I’ve heard that some forums will still reprocess externally hosted photos too.The one that didn't make the cut for the Shadow Contest, at the old abattoirs I am documenting that is getting repurposed.
Just for example, I am posting the same image twice, to illustrate the crushing of blacks happening on this forum. I'll post externally from now on with my images, so they appear as I intended them to be! No insult meant to the forum gods in any way, I truly love your work, this is a special safe corner of the Interwebz for me to visit and enjoy.
Image uploaded to the forum.
View attachment 939405
Image hosted externally.
_DSC2984 by Alex Mausolf, on Flickr
Sony a7III, Sony 16-35mm, Daylight WB, -2 EV
ISO 400, 16mm, f/4, 1/30
That is the penalty of viewing on a phone, I guess. I can clearly see the difference on my 27" calibrated monitor and the iPad Pro, but not on my iPhone 11 Pro Max! This screen is supposed to be the bees knees of colour dynamics! 😱Call me crazy, but I can’t tell the difference on them. Your native Flickr shot does have more detail. I’ve heard that some forums will still reprocess externally hosted photos too.
Yeah, I‘m viewing from my own iPad Pro (2020 model), and they look the same. Maybe it’s how the site host mobile browsers? Like it’s reducing quality for the sake of saving RAM and mobile data? Very odd. Anyway, I don’t know if this will work, but here is the screenshot of the 2 from my iPad. I’m not sure if it will look different to you, or if both will look the same like they do for me:That is the penalty of viewing on a phone, I guess. I can clearly see the difference on my 27" calibrated monitor and the iPad Pro, but not on my iPhone 11 Pro Max! This screen is supposed to be the bees knees of colour dynamics! 😱
That appears different on my 2018 iPad Pro 12.9"! There's a lot more shadow detail in the off site hosted image. I wonder if it's a browser thing? I am viewing on Firefox on the iPad and my iPhone. I could see there possibly being a lighter bandwidth/lower IQ version broadcast for the phone. Are you viewing on Safari on your iPad Pro?Yeah, I‘m viewing from my own iPad Pro (2020 model), and they look the same. Maybe it’s how the site host mobile browsers? Like it’s reducing quality for the sake of saving RAM and mobile data? Very odd. Anyway, I don’t know if this will work, but here is the screenshot of the 2 from my iPad. I’m not sure if it will look different to you, or if both will look the same like they do for me:
View attachment 939642
The top one seems duller to me, viewed on my 8+. The blacks are the same but the purple seems almost matte.Yeah, I‘m viewing from my own iPad Pro (2020 model), and they look the same. Maybe it’s how the site host mobile browsers? Like it’s reducing quality for the sake of saving RAM and mobile data? Very odd. Anyway, I don’t know if this will work, but here is the screenshot of the 2 from my iPad. I’m not sure if it will look different to you, or if both will look the same like they do for me:
View attachment 939642
Yes, I noticed a compression or simplification of colour tones too in the images hosted on the forum on every device. I am bemused as to the 11 Pro Max not showing any difference, when I view the image on my photos app it is blatantly different! It seems to be a web and device based issue! Considering the vast majority of people use their mobile phones to view things that changes what I can share if I want people to be able to enjoy the editing I have gone with, especially for shadow and colour detail that has subtlety to it. Damn it! Why don't people have 27" calibrated phones?The top one seems duller to me, viewed on my 8+. The blacks are the same but the purple seems almost matte.
To be fair my son is color blind and there is a theory that mothers of color blind children see more colors than the average person.Maybe it’s Darmok’s male 8-bit color eyeballs that are the problem.![]()
I’ve heard the color blind gene is passed down by the mother (my dad is color blind, but I am not), but I hadn’t heard the part about the mother seeing even more colors before. That’s pretty wild if that‘s the case!To be fair my son is color blind and there is a theory that mothers of color blind children see more colors than the average person.
While I worked in theatres, the best lighting operators were always women! They had far greater ability than men to discern subtleties of colour differences thrown through the coloured gels by the lighting equipment!To be fair my son is color blind and there is a theory that mothers of color blind children see more colors than the average person.
I’ve heard the color blind gene is passed down by the mother (my dad is color blind, but I am not), but I hadn’t heard the part about the mother seeing even more colors before. That’s pretty wild if that‘s the case!
While I worked in theatres, the best lighting operators were always women! They had far greater ability than men to discern subtleties of colour differences thrown through the coloured gels by the lighting equipment!
Okay, so I wasn't fast, but I somehow managed to ace it? I'm curious how Mrs Darmok would do.![]()
Tetrachromacy - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
My brother is colorblind which means my mother is a carrier. Her father was also colorblind as well as my male cousins on her side. My mother used to quilt before arthritis had her stop and people always commented on her color choices as being extremely good. I suspect she and I are both tetrochromats even though it isn’t proven in humans. My daughter does not see color as well as I do which I hope means her potential sons will not be colorblind.
X-rite has a test to determine your color ability and I usually score around 97%.
![]()
Free Online Color Challenge and Hue Test; X-Rite
X-Rite's online color challenge and hue test is a free tetrachromatic test that allows you to test your color accuracy and color vision.www.xrite.com
How old is the monitor? You need to calibrate them every three weeks or so.I took the test mentioned above.
Three different times at differing light levels.
Can't seem to do better than a 6. Monitor is calibrated from the factory, sRGB.
View attachment 939743
How old is the monitor? You need to calibrate them every three weeks or so.
That's a 6! It's still pretty dang good! Did you see the worst score for us men! 8484 😱 Must have been viewing it on an old B&W Rank Arena TV from the early 60's. 🤣I took the test mentioned above.
Three different times at differing light levels.
Can't seem to do better than a 6. Monitor is calibrated from the factory, sRGB.
View attachment 939743
Could well be. Mine aren’t getting better with age! Probably should book an eye test at some point. It’s been a good few years.It's a new monitor.
I suspect it's my eyes
So, now the sun is up higher....
Better light.
Scored well.
View attachment 939748