Did it eat too many nuts? !I’ll post a squirrel too
Wonderful contrast!
You sure his photo wasn't taken on a Nintendo DSi?a slight bend of the rules today; two photos and one of them not even mine. but a good case study of "what you see" vs "what i see" and that how gear doesn't matter until it does.
my husband sent me a photo of a fox hanging out in the empty lot this morning next to us while i was driving the kids to school. when i got home 45 minutes later, it was still there napping. although he doesn't care a lick about taking good photos on his own, he does try to scout good photo ops for me. ?
his photo taken on his iPhone 8, mine taken on my Z6ii with the Sigma 150-600 Contemporary at 600mm. his photo is great to show anyone that he saw a fox. my photo great to show what a fox looks like.
View attachment 1922471
iso 1250 | f/6.3 | 1/400
View attachment 1922472
sorry for missing the squirrel parade, but i like foxes better. ?
You sure his photo wasn't taken on a Nintendo DSi?
Your hubby's image with the washed colors and the lattice fence could have been a good art print with a little post processing.a slight bend of the rules today; two photos and one of them not even mine. but a good case study of "what you see" vs "what i see" and that how gear doesn't matter until it does.
my husband sent me a photo of a fox hanging out in the empty lot this morning next to us while i was driving the kids to school. when i got home 45 minutes later, it was still there napping. although he doesn't care a lick about taking good photos on his own, he does try to scout good photo ops for me.
his photo taken on his iPhone 8, mine taken on my Z6ii with the Sigma 150-600 Contemporary at 600mm. his photo isgreat(eta: okay, mediocre) to show anyone that he saw a fox. my photo great to show what a fox looks like.
View attachment 1922471
iso 1250 | f/6.3 | 1/400
View attachment 1922472
sorry for missing the squirrel parade, but i like foxes better.![]()
actually mine does have a push/pull zoom, which i never noticed before. but it's a lot slower than using the focusing ring. but this explains why it always zooms to 600mm if i don't lock it.Your hubby's image with the washed colors and the lattice fence could have been a good art print with a little post processing.
I saw a YouTube vid on Sigma Deutschland (German language) I believe they took the Sigma 150-600 to the Antarctica. Great pics. Though the lens they used appeared to have a push-pull zoom, may have been a different animal.
Unfortunately, we get the cheap chattery rotating collar on this lens that reminds me of the 120-300 Sports, and reminds me of how nice the 150-600 Sports’ collar is. And removing the collar requires removing the camera body which I really do not like. Why not a hinged collar? Zooming is a little less easy than with the Sports too. The zoom ring is fine but trying to use the push-pull method (which we will talk about in the upcoming Sigma 150-600mm Sport review) for quick zooming is more difficult for two reasons. There is no convenient groove in which to place your fingers and while pushing to zoom toward 600mm is easy because you are pushing against the flared lens barrel, pulling to zoom toward 150mm requires a fairly tight grip and I found my hand slipping some of the time. With gloves on it would be more difficult still. In addition, the friction is not consistent and the mechanism tightens up noticeably at the long end between 500mm and 600mm. That makes smooth zooming a bit challenging.
actually mine does have a push/pull zoom, which i never noticed before. but it's a lot slower than using the focusing ring. but this explains why it always zooms to 600mm if i don't lock it.
There are two versions of this lens, the Contemporary, which I have, and is more affordable, and the Sport which is more expensive, but somehow better. I don't use this lens often enough to justify more money on it, and I've been satisfied with the images I get from it.
From Photography Life: