Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

malofx

macrumors 6502
Mar 22, 2012
293
2,133
Los Angeles
Great story. Great colors and scenery. However I don't like the square format. Is this because it was made for instagram? And it could be sharper, look at the rocks in the foreground. Is this also the result of instagram?

Anyhow, just my opinion. But since you wanted it...

The size was meant for Instagram, the processing is all me. Thank you for the tips, I am still learning. Feedback is always welcome and necessary.
[doublepost=1493764704][/doublepost]
Thats gorgeous. Maybe lift the shadows a tad on the mountains? to get some of that beautiful detail?


Thank you for the feedback, I had no idea lifting the shadows would actually give it a better sharp feel. Thanks again for the feedback. Should I post a new version? or leave it for next month, I'm not too sure what the rules are for double post?
 

floling

macrumors regular
Dec 5, 2011
104
100
bilbao_7124.jpg
Bilbao, San Mamés - 2017
 

oblomow

macrumors 601
Apr 14, 2005
4,509
18,903
Netherlands
The size was meant for Instagram, the processing is all me. Thank you for the tips, I am still learning. Feedback is always welcome and necessary.
[doublepost=1493764704][/doublepost]


Thank you for the feedback, I had no idea lifting the shadows would actually give it a better sharp feel. Thanks again for the feedback. Should I post a new version? or leave it for next month, I'm not too sure what the rules are for double post?

It's the 'photo-of-the-day thread'. So you can post a new image every day. I don't think people would mind if you posted a new version on the same day. Just to keep the discussion going.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kenoh

kenoh

macrumors 604
Jul 18, 2008
6,507
10,850
Glasgow, UK
The size was meant for Instagram, the processing is all me. Thank you for the tips, I am still learning. Feedback is always welcome and necessary.
[doublepost=1493764704][/doublepost]


Thank you for the feedback, I had no idea lifting the shadows would actually give it a better sharp feel. Thanks again for the feedback. Should I post a new version? or leave it for next month, I'm not too sure what the rules are for double post?

Stick it back up. I wouldn't mind seeing it again - helps me know I am not giving you a bum steer too. :)
 
Last edited:

kenoh

macrumors 604
Jul 18, 2008
6,507
10,850
Glasgow, UK
Comments always appreciated. Difficult to get a good angle on these falls - that's about a 60-foot drop. Lack of water doesn't help either!


Corra Linn lower
by another scotsman, on Flickr

Think you need to get your Speedos on and get in there... :)

Really liking the colour palette of Scotland right now. Shame the angle is so acute as that looks like a lovely gentle falls to capture.
 

anotherscotsman

macrumors 68020
Aug 2, 2014
2,369
16,735
UK
Think you need to get your Speedos on and get in there... :)

Really liking the colour palette of Scotland right now. Shame the angle is so acute as that looks like a lovely gentle falls to capture.
Not so much a Speedos problem Ken- getting down the gorge is pretty challenging anywhere near this point. This is a beautiful spot in autumn and the surrounding woodland is filled with spring flowers at the moment. The smell of wild garlic is overpowering in some places though!
 
  • Like
Reactions: kenoh

oblomow

macrumors 601
Apr 14, 2005
4,509
18,903
Netherlands
Think you need to get your Speedos on and get in there... :)

Really liking the colour palette of Scotland right now. Shame the angle is so acute as that looks like a lovely gentle falls to capture.

Keep the colours, please. We'll be visiting scotland (again) this summer. So please leave something for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kenoh

Doylem

macrumors 68040
Dec 30, 2006
3,858
3,642
Wherever I hang my hat...
Hey Hugh, it looks like you may have brushed an adjustment into the sky to darken it. If you did, go gentle with that type of adjustment or feather a bit more...there appears to be a distinct line above the trees. If you didn't, then disregard and right this comment off to my imagination.

~ Peter

I agree. HDR processing of an already well-lit scene seems to create all kinds of unwanted artifacts. I just think "HDR"... and hardly notice the landscape...

The English at play...

morris5_maldon2.jpg
 
Last edited:

Mark0

macrumors 6502a
Sep 11, 2014
516
3,399
SW Scotland
Yes... so... as a Sony A7Rii user I can say that it is quick at AF, but not quick enough for BIF. I missed far too many shots because the camera had lost lock on the bird. On more than one occasion I considered putting the camera away and sitting in a huff but after persevering I was rewarded with some nice shots but i earned them!

I must have fired off around 300 shots and had about 6 that I thought were good enough. Truth be told, it was Red Kites and they swoop down so quick that the 60D and 70-200 f4L couldn't really cope. Maybe in better light I'd have been able to use a faster shutter and tone down the ISO a bit. Obviously a faster, longer zoom would've made a difference. Overall though, photographing birds in flight just didn't do anything for me. I didn't get much out of it intrinsically.

Macro's a good bit easier than BIF imo.
Just trying it free hand is a bit more tricky. Always best with a tripod if you can.

The way I feel about macro is the same about BIF - I just don't get much from it. I have had some good shots, but can't be bothered with all the faffing about haha!

Maybe I'm just too used to landscapes and others probably feel the same about it. I know a few folk into photography who give me some looks when I say I've waited for hours on a hill once just to grab a single shot. It's obviously not their cup of tea!
 
  • Like
Reactions: kenoh

kenoh

macrumors 604
Jul 18, 2008
6,507
10,850
Glasgow, UK
I must have fired off around 300 shots and had about 6 that I thought were good enough. Truth be told, it was Red Kites and they swoop down so quick that the 60D and 70-200 f4L couldn't really cope. Maybe in better light I'd have been able to use a faster shutter and tone down the ISO a bit. Obviously a faster, longer zoom would've made a difference. Overall though, photographing birds in flight just didn't do anything for me. I didn't get much out of it intrinsically.



The way I feel about macro is the same about BIF - I just don't get much from it. I have had some good shots, but can't be bothered with all the faffing about haha!

Maybe I'm just too used to landscapes and others probably feel the same about it. I know a few folk into photography who give me some looks when I say I've waited for hours on a hill once just to grab a single shot. It's obviously not their cup of tea!


I am definitely of the wait on a hillside for a landscape persuasion.

Yes, thank you, I would love another reason to lust after he 70-200 f2.8!!! :)

BTW @Mark0 Colin Prior is as you would hope, a very nice guy.

I think BIF is OK but not my gig. I would be more satisfied with a nice panoramic landscape shot like you do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark0

Mark0

macrumors 6502a
Sep 11, 2014
516
3,399
SW Scotland
I am definitely of the wait on a hillside for a landscape persuasion.

Yes, thank you, I would love another reason to lust after he 70-200 f2.8!!! :)

BTW @Mark0 Colin Prior is as you would hope, a very nice guy.

I think BIF is OK but not my gig. I would be more satisfied with a nice panoramic landscape shot like you do.

I love panoramics and Colin Prior was the driving force behind that for me back in the 1990's. Speaking of panoramics, my last batch of panoramic film wasn't great! I was a stop or three out which is deadly on Velvia 50. This was because I was using the X-T2 for metering. The ISO values are different to the Canon I'd used before. I'll need to compensate a lot more than I thought and adjust my bracketing next time round. I get 4 shots per roll, so normally bracket the 4 shots for each scene.

I got two good frames from 1 of the 5 rolls I shot. It was only good because I'd forgotten to reset the manual aperture after using the ground glass to compose, so shot the photo at f5.6 rather than f16 by accident! I think there might be enough sharpness at infinity hyperfocally but will need to see on the lightbox with my loupe to be sure. The slide looks sharp to my eye, but the proof will come from seeing it with my 10x loupe. If it's good, I'll post it here.

I'm so annoyed because it wasn't even the roll featuring the best light! Oh well!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.