Hopefully Google just pulls the old bait and switch at the announcement.
Haha no I know, I definitely think we are seeing the real thing. For once though it would be neat to see a company be like "oh you guys thought that was actually it? Lololol no here's the real thing" and come out with something completely new and never seen.I've noticed a lot of comments believing and/or wishing for this. I mean, I'd LOVE to be wrong, but I highly doubt this is all a ploy by Google. I could believe these are controlled leaks, but I don't think they're for the express purpose of trolling us and then surprising us with a better looking Pixel 3 XL device.
However, there were rumors of a third Pixel 3 that is of an even more premium and higher tier, so who knows...
August 22, 2018 — Stolen Pixel 3 XL handsets are apparently being sold on the Ukranian black market
https://www.androidcentral.com/google-pixel-3
BTW, here are full res samples of all the Pixel 3 XL photos: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1vfue-ZMNQG79SY1Pblrm5lO8-BS6yMb1
They look good, but so far nothing that stands out so much that it shows a major difference in upgrade from the Pixel 2. Or is it just me?
In fact, I'd argue that some of those low light scenic shots don't show a lot of details in the shadowier parts of the picture.
Anybody with a keen eye want to offer their opinions?
[doublepost=1534968723][/doublepost]Still no leaks or clues to a face-unlock feature. Those two front facing cameras can't just be for selfies... I hope.
It really is the ugliest phone I've ever seen, only due to that absurd notch. Do they even care for a nice design?I know they're just internet comments, but I hope Google is reading some of them from all the leaked Pixel 3 XL stories.
The responses are almost unanimous in how ugly the 3 XL is.
9to5Google details the black market Pixel 3 XL story. Looks pretty legit.
And more leaks are coming.
It really concerns me that there is nothing about face unlock in these leaks.
That would make the two front facing cameras solely for selfies. If true, that would be yet another baffling and poor decision from Google.
As someone else here mentioned, Google claims their software/AI processing is all you need for the one camera on the back, but the front requires two?
[doublepost=1535033661][/doublepost]Pixel 3 XL camera comparison vs P20 and Note 9: https://www.phonearena.com/news/Pixel-3-XL-vs-P20-Pro-Note-9-camera-samples-comparison-test_id108069
I suppose you could say it’s an improvement on the pixel 2 in terms of the amount of bezel but I just can’t get over that notch. It’s the worst notch. If the aren’t putting a 3D camera in the front for facial recognition then they should follow Samsung’s design.I'm starting to appreciate the back and side design of the Pixel 3 a little more. It looks smoother, more rounded off (I think the Pixel 2 feels a bit too boxy and thick), and sleek. I also like that the two-tone look is a little more subdued and subtle -- still unique but not loudly so.
It's just unfortunate what happens when you get to the front.
From the giant notch:
To the giant chin:
Others manufacturers are doing stereo speakers as well, but using a downward firing bottom speaker, which is fine. They could have at least followed suit and eliminated the chin.It comes back to Google's insistence on front facing dual speakers. That's where all of this ugly notch/chin business comes from. You can blame the front facing dual speakers.
So not worth it.
According to one source the site spoke with, the two cameras will allow for a new "Super Selfie" mode with another mention of there being an "improved Portrait Mode." A leak from earlier today revealed new Portrait settings in the camera app, so that all lines up quite nicely.
As for the second sensor specifically, another source claims that this will act as a wide-angle lens so that users can fit more people in the frame in a single shot.
It probably would have leaked by now. Especially with this recent stream of leaks. It will likely ust have Trusted Face again.Any info on the Pixel 3 XL facial recognition feature?