Some great shots!
I have seen numerous “reviews” now talking about the image stabilization, wish someone would throw up some comparisons between OIS and sensor-shift already. I’m no photographer but I’d love to understand what I’m missing.
Some great shots!
I have seen numerous “reviews” now talking about the image stabilization, wish someone would throw up some comparisons between OIS and sensor-shift already. I’m no photographer but I’d love to understand what I’m missing.
Low light only?Basically you just have to try a little harder to keep the phone steadier when taking lower light photos. It’s more sensitive to slight movements.
Low to medium. The more light you have the less you have to worry about it.Low light only?
Thank you 😊 just amateur photography and a hobby I love.These photos are looking awesome. Are you a photographer or something![]()
Thank you 😊 just amateur photography and a hobby I love.
They are straight from the camera! I saw no reason to edit the photos. The camera is great on the 16e, it’s just lacking the lenses and features of the more expensive iPhones.Have you edited those photos at all in a programme on your computer or iPhone? Or are they straight from the camera? They are VERY impressive shots.
I am curious if 16e really has that good of a battery life. 60hz and 4000mAh and 6.1" should be a great combo. Interestingly enough, online the opinions vary. I kinda want to buy a 1TB 15 Pro, but boy you really cannot ignore the 3200 mAh only battery. The small pros always have ****** battery (especially after the 1 year mark). My 13PM (with 86% health) still has very strong battery life. And I really do not want poor battery life
On the other hand, the 16e is so tempting because it is as light as my regular S24.. Think I am going to wait and see if the 17 Pro gets at least a 3800 mAh, but also the $1500 price sucks.
Decisions decisions...
They are straight from the camera! I saw no reason to edit the photos. The camera is great on the 16e, it’s just lacking the lenses and features of the more expensive iPhones.
Thanks for the reply. Really impressive. Pro features don't matter as much for me but yes the lenses may be missed, especially the telephoto but that's only on the Pro models now I think? Anyway it's promising for the iPhone Air if it's real with its rumoured one camera being just as good.
No worries! Like the 16e the iPhone 16 has the same 2x zoom/crop into the centre of the 48mp camera. Obviously the 16 has the ultra wide lens.
I take a lot of photos and have added many in here to show how well the 16e camera performs in different scenarios.
I imagine the rumoured single camera on the iPhone 17 Air will have better specs than the 16e’s set up, and no doubt perform very well.
Your photos are very good. I am deciding between 16 and 16e and I am balancing loss of macro vs longer battery life and zoomI agree with the zoom, 2x is fine but after that quality falls off fast! I did post a 10x moon shot yesterday further back in here, not great as I expected. Also a night mode shot which wasn’t bad of the stars and better than I was expecting.
The zoom on the 16e must be better than you had on the mini?
Are these 16 or 16e photos ?View attachment 2492763Camera seems to work just fine - shot HEIF then edited in Cobalt for film look and Snapseed for frame. Light, simple, fast. So far I'm not missing the 16 Pro...
Your photos are very good. I am deciding between 16 and 16e and I am balancing loss of macro vs longer battery life and zoom
So far 16e is winning it keep posting please
Your photos are very good. I am deciding between 16 and 16e and I am balancing loss of macro vs longer battery life and zoom
So far 16e is winning it keep posting please